Gynoecium and fruit histology and development in Eugeissona (Calamoideae: Arecaceae)

Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 168, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 377-394

  Bobrov, Alexey V F Ch ^a   Dransfield, John ^b   Romanov, Mikhail S ^c   Romanova, Ekaterina S ^a  

^a MOSCOW STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^b ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS   (United Kingdom)

^c RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Borasseae; Carpel wall structure; Nypa; Pericarp anatomy; Pyrene; Scales; Vasculature

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY; FRUIT; HISTOLOGY; MONOCOTYLEDON; POLLINATION; TOPOGRAPHY;

ARECACEAE; BORASSEAE; CALAMOIDEAE; EUGEISSONA; NYPA;

EID: 84857967630     PISSN: 00244074     EISSN: 10958339     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2012.01213.x     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Askgaard A, Stauffer FW, Hodel DR, Barfod AS. 2008. Floral structure in the neotropical palm genus Chamaedorea (Arecaceae, Areceae). Annales del Jardín Botánico de Madrid 65: 197-210.
2. Asmussen CB, Dransfield J, Deickmann V, Barfod AS, Pintaud J-C, Baker WJ. 2006. A new subfamily classification of the palm family (Arecaceae): evidence from plastid DNA phylogeny. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 151: 15-38.
3. Baker WJ, Dransfield J, Hedderson TA. 2000. Phylogeny, character evolution, and a new classification of the calamoid palms. Systematic Botany 25: 297-322.
4. Baker WJ, Savolainen V, Asmussen-Lange CB, Chase MW, Dransfield J, Forest F, Harley MM, Uhl NW, Wilkinson M. 2009. Complete generic-level phylogenetic analyses of palms (Arecaceae) with comparisons of supertree and supermatrix approaches. Systematic Biology 58: 240-256.
5. Beccari O. 1913. Le palme del genere Eugeissona sono delle Lepidocaryeae o piuttosto delle Cocoinae. Webbia 4: 190-202.
6. Bessey CE. 1915. The phylogenetic taxonomy of flowering plants. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 2: 109-164.
7. Biradar NV, Mahabale TS. 1969. Studies on palms: fruits, seeds and seed germination in the genus Phoenix L. Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences. Sect. B 70: 55-65.
8. Bobrov AV, Džalilova KK, Melikian AP. 2007a. Fruit structure in Palmae. I. Trachycarpus fortunei (Hook.) H. Wendl. In: Smirnov YS, ed. Biological diversity. Plant introduction. St Petersburg: Komarov Botanical Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, 429-431 [in Russian].
9. Bobrov AV, Melikian AP, Romanov MS. 2009. Morphogeny of fruits in Magnoliophyta. Moscow. [in Russian].
10. Bobrov AV, Romanov MS. 2007. Fruit structure in Palmae. II. Chamaerops humilis L. In: Smirnov YS, ed. Biological diversity. Plant introduction. St Petersburg: Komarov Botanical Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, 505-507 [in Russian].
11. Bobrov AV, Romanov MS, Džalilova KK. 2007b. Fruit structure in Palmae. III. Pseudophoenix H. Wendl. ex Sarg. In: Zibzeev EG, Selutina IY, eds. Perspectives and problems of modern botany: proceedings of the Russian scientific and practical conference of young scientists in Novosibirsk. Novosibirsk: SB RAS Publishing, 262-265 [in Russian].
12. Bobrov AV, Romanov MS, Melikian AP. 2008a. Fruit structure in Rhapis L. fil. (Arecaceae-Coryphoideae). In: Batigina TB, Zhinkina NA, Ivanova AN, Miroslavov EA, Muravnik LE, Pautov AA, Sysoeva MI, Torshilova AA, Shamrov II, Jakovleva OV, eds. Fundamental and applied problems of botany in the beginning of the XXI century: materials of Russian conference. Part. 1. Petrozavodsk: Karelian Scientific Center, 10-13 [in Russian].
13. Bobrov AV, Romanov MS, Melikian AP. 2011. Trial of reconstruction of fruit morphogenesis in palm family (Arecaceae) Bulletin MOIP 116: 40-47. [in Russian].
14. Bobrov AV, Romanov MS, Romanova ES. 2008b. Morphogenetic types of fruits in archaic palms (Arecaceae-Coryphoideae s. str.). In: Oparina SN, ed. Modern problems of morphology and reproductive biology of seed plants. Uljanovsk: UlSPU, 50-56 [in Russian].
15. Bondartzev AS. 1954. Schkala tzvetov dlya biologicheskih issledovany [Scale of colours for biological investigations]. Moscow: Vysschaya Schkola [in Russian].
16. Cave MC. 1869. Structure et développement du fruit. Annales des sciences naturelles Ser. 5. Botanique 10: 123-190.
17. Chapin MH, Essig FB, Pintaud J-C. 2001. The morphology and histology of the fruits of Pelagodoxa (Arecaceae): taxonomic and biogeographical implications. Systematic Botany 26: 779-785.
18. Chen J-M, Chen D, Gituru WR, Wang Q-F. 2004. Evolution of apocarpy in Alismatidae using phylogenetic evidence from chloroplast rbcL gene sequence data. Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica 45: 33-40.
19. Corner EJH. 1966. The natural history of palms. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
20. Cronquist A. 1981. An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. New York: Columbia University.
21. Dahlgren RMT, Clifford HT, Yeo PF. 1985. The families of the monocotyledons. Berlin, etc.: Springer.
22. De Mendonca MS, De Oliveira AB, De Araújo MGP, Araújo LM. 2008. Morpho-anatomia do fruto e semente de Oenocarpus minor Mart. (Arecaceae). Revista Brasileira de Sementes 30: 90-95.
23. Doyle JA, Endress PK. 2000. Morphological phylogenetic analysis of basal angiosperms: comparison and combination with molecular data. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161 (Suppl): S121-S153.
24. Dransfield J. 1970. Studies in the Malayan palms Eugeissona and Johannesteijsmannia. Unpublished D. Phil. Thesis, University of Cambridge.
25. Dransfield J, Uhl NW. 1998. Palmae. In: Kubitzki K, ed. The families and genera of vascular plants. Vol. 4. Berlin, etc: Springer, 306-389.
26. Dransfield J, Uhl NW, Asmussen CB, Baker WJ, Harley MM, Lewis CE. 2008. Genera palmarum. The evolution and classification of palms, 2nd edn. London: Kew Publishing.
27. Drude O. 1887. Palmae. In: Engler A, Prantl K, eds. Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. T. 2. 3. Abt. Leipzig: W. Engelmann, 1-93.
28. Eames AJ. 1961. Morphology of the angiosperms. New York, etc.: Mc Graw-Hill.
29. Endress PK. 1994. Diversity and evolutionary biology of tropical flowers. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
30. Endress PK, Igersheim A. 2000. Gynoecium structure and evolution of basal angiosperms. International Journal of Plant Sciences 161 (Suppl): S211-S223.
31. Essig FB. 1977. A systematic histological study of palm fruits. I. The Ptychosperma alliance. Systematic Botany 2: 151-168.
32. Essig FB. 1999. Trends of specialization in the palm pericarp. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 83: 73-78.
33. Essig FB. 2002. A systematic histological study of palm fruits. VI. Subtribe Linospadicinae (Arecaceae). Brittonia 54: 196-201.
34. Essig FB, Bussard L, Hernandez N. 2001. A systematic histological study of palm fruits. IV. Subtribe Oncospermatinae (Arecaceae). Brittonia 53: 466-471.
35. Essig FB, Hernandez N. 2001. A systematic histological study of palm fruits. V. Subtribe Archontophoenicinae (Arecaceae). Brittonia 54: 65-71.
36. Essig FB, Litten L. 2004. A systematic histological analysis of palm fruits. VII. The Cyrtostachydinae (Arecaceae). Brittonia 56: 375-379.
37. Essig FB, Manka TJ, Bussard L. 1999. A systematic histological study of palm fruits. III. Subtribe Iguanurinae (Arecaceae). Brittonia 51: 307-325.
38. Essig FB, Young BE. 1979. A systematic histological study of palm fruits. II. The Areca alliance. Systematic Botany 4: 16-28.
39. Fisher JB, Goh ChJ, Rao AN. 2008. Non-axillary branching in the palms Eugeissona and Oncosperma (Arecaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 99: 347-363.
40. Garcin AG. 1890. Recherches sur l'histogenésèse des péricarpes charnus. Annales des sciences naturelles Ser. 7. Botanique 12: 175-401.
41. Giddey A, Spichiger RE, Stauffer FW. 2009. Comparative floral structure and systematics in the Asian palm genus Rhapis (Arecaceae, Coryphoideae). Flora 204: 347-357.
42. Hartl D, Severin I. 1981. Verwachsungen im Umfeld des Griffels bei Allium, Cyanastrum und Heliconia und den Monokotylen allgemein. Beiträge zur Biologie der Pflanzen 55: 235-260.
43. Hutchinson J. 1973. The families of flowering plants, 3rd edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
44. Igersheim A, Buzgo M, Endress PK. 2001. Gynoecium diversity and systematics in basal monocots. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 136: 1-65.
45. Imkhanitzkaya NN. 1985. Palms. Leningrad: Nauka [in Russian].
46. Joshi AC. 1947. Floral histogenesis and carpel morphology. Journal of the Indian Botanical Society 26: 63-74.
47. Juliano JB. 1926. Origin, development, and nature of the stony layer of the coconut. Philippine Journal of Science 30: 187-200.
48. Landsberg GS. 1981. Anatomical and morphological structure of pericarp of Phoenix (Arecaceae). Botanicheskij Žhurnal (Moscow & Leningrad) 66: 388-391 [in Russian].
49. Moore HE Jr. 1973. The major groups of palms and their distribution. Gentes Herbarium 11: 27-141.
50. Murray SG. 1973. The formation of endocarp of palm fruits. Principes 17: 91-102.
51. O'Brien TP, McCully ME. 1981. The study of plant structure: principles and selected methods. Melbourne: Termacarphi Pty.
52. Prozina MN. 1960. Botanicheskaja mikrotekhnika [Botanical microtechniques]. Moscow: Vysschaya Schkola [in Russian].
53. Puri V. 1952. Placentation in angiosperms. Botanical Review 18: 603-651.
54. Romanov MS, Bobrov AVFCh, Wijesundara DSA, Romanova ES. 2011. Pericarp development and fruit structure in borassoid palms (Arecaceae-Coryphoideae-Borasseae). Annals of Botany 108: 1489-1502.
55. Roth I. 1977. Fruits of angiosperms. Berlin, Stuttgart: G. Borntraeger.
56. Rudall P. 2002. Homologies of inferior ovaries and septal nectarines in monocotyledons. International Journal of Plant Sciences 163: 261-276.
57. Rudall PJ, Abranson K, Dransfield J, Baker W. 2003. Floral anatomy in Dypsis (Arecaceae-Areceae): a case of complex synorganization and stamen reduction. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 143: 115-133.
58. Stauffer FW, Baker WJ, Dransfield J, Endress PK. 2004. Comparative floral structure and systematics of Pelagodoxa and Sommieria (Arecaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 146: 27-39.
59. Stauffer FW, Barfod A, Endress PK. 2009. Floral structure in Licuala peltata (Arecaceae: Coryphoideae) with special reference to the architecture of the unusual labyrinthine nectary. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 161: 66-77.
60. Stauffer FW, Endress PK. 2003. Comparative morphology of female flower and systematics in Geonomeae (Arecaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 242: 171-203.
61. Stauffer FW, Rutishauser R, Endress PK. 2002. Morphology and development of the female flowers in Geonoma interrupta (Arecaceae). American Journal of Botany 89: 220-229.
62. Takhtajan AL. 1942. Structural types of gynoecium and placentation of ovules. Reports of Armenian Branch of Academy Sciences of USSR 3/4: 91-112 [in Russian].
63. Takhtajan AL. 1964. Fundamentals of evolutionary morphology of angiosperms. Moscow, Leningrad: Nauka [in Russian].
64. Takhtajan AL. 1987. Systema magnoliophytorum. Leningrad: Nauka [in Russian].
65. Takhtajan AL. 2009. Flowering plants, 2nd edn. New York, etc: Springer.
66. Troll W. 1928. Zur Auffassung der parakarpen Gynaeceums und des coenokarpen Gynaeceums überhaupt. Planta 6: 255-276.
67. Uhl NW, Dransfield J. 1984. Development of the inflorescence, androecium, and gynoecium with reference to palms. In: White RA, Dickison WC, eds. Contemporary problems in plant anatomy. New York: Academic Press, 397-449.
68. Uhl NW, Dransfield J. 1987. Genera palmarum, a classification of palms based on the work of Harold E. Moore, Jr. Lawrence: Allen Press.
69. Uhl NW, Moore HE. 1971. The palm gynoecium. American Journal of Botany 58: 945-992.
70. Vegas C, Millán B, Pintaud J-C, Kahn F. 2008. Anatomía del fruto y perianto en especies peruanas del género Astrocaryum (Arecaceae): descripción e importancia taxonómica. Revista Peruana de Biología 15 (Suppl): 85-96.
71. Wiens F, Zitzmann A, Lachance M-A, Yegles M, Pragst F, Wurst FM, von Holst D, Guan SL, Spanagel R. 2008. Chronic intake of fermented floral nectar by wild treeshrews. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105: 10426-10431.