When natural experiments are neither natural nor experiments

American Political Science Review

Volumn 106, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 35-57

  Sekhon, Jasjeet S ^a   Titiunik, Rocío ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857955361     PISSN: 00030554     EISSN: 15375943     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0003055411000542     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Abrajano, Marisa A., Jonathan Nagler, and R. Michael Alvarez. 2005."ANaturalExperiment ofRace-Based and IssueVoting:The 2001 City of Los Angeles Elections." Political Research Quarterly 58 (2): 203-18. (Pubitemid 41095890)
2. Ansolabehere, Stephen, JamesM. Snyder, and Charles Stewart. 2000. "OldVoters,NewVoters, and the PersonalVote: UsingRedistricting toMeasure the Incumbency Advantage." American Journal of Political Science 44 (1): 17-34.
3. Bhavnani, Rikhil R. 2009. "Do Electoral Quotas Work after They Are Withdrawn? Evidence from a Natural Experiment in India." American Political Science Review 103 (1): 23-35.
4. Butler, Daniel Mark. 2009. "A Regression Discontinuity Design Analysis of the Incumbency Advantage and Tenure in the U.S. House." Electoral Studies 28 (2): 123-28.
5. Carman, Christopher, JamesMitchell, and Robert Johns. 2008. "The Unfortunate Natural Experiment in Ballot Design: The Scottish Parliamentary Elections of 2007." Electoral Studies 27 (3): 442-59.
6. Carson, Jamie L., Erik J. Engstrom, and Jason M. Roberts. 2007. "Candidate Quality, the Personal Vote, and the Incumbency Advantage in Congress." American Political Science Review 101 (2): 289-301.
7. Caughey, Devin, and Jasjeet S. Sekhon. 2011. "Elections and the Regression-Discontinuity Design: Lessons from Close U.S. House Races, 1942-2008." Political Analysis 19 (4): 385-408.
8. Cox, Gary W., and Jonathan N. Katz. 2002. Elbridge Gerry's Salamander: The Electoral Consequences of the Reapportionment Revolution. New York: Cambridge University Press.
9. Desposato, Scott W., and John R. Petrocik. 2003. "The Variable Incumbency Advantage: NewVoters, Redistricting, and the Personal Vote." American Journal of Political Science 47 (1): 18-32. (Pubitemid 36532747)
10. Diamond, Alexis, and Jasjeet S. Sekhon. 2005. "Genetic Matching for Estimating Causal Effects: A General Multivariate Matching Method for Achieving Balance in Observational Studies." Working Paper. http://sekhon.berkeley. edu/papers/GenMatch.pdf (accessed November 16, 2011).
11. Diamond, Jared, and James A. Robinson, eds. 2010. Natural Experiments of History. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
12. Dunning, Thad. 2008. "Improving Causal Inference: Strengths and Limitations of Natural Experiments." Political Science Quarterly 61 (2): 282-93.
13. Erikson, Robert S. 1971. "The Advantage of Incumbency in Congressional Elections." Polity 3 (3): 395-405.
14. Gelman, Andrew, and Gary King. 1990. "Estimating Incumbency Advantage without Bias." American Journal of Political Science 34 (4): 1142-64.
15. Gordon, Sandy, and Greg Huber. 2007. "The Effect of Electoral Competitiveness on Incumbent Behavior." Quarterly Journal of Political Science 2 (2): 107-38.
16. Grofman, Bernard, Robert Griffin, andGregory Berry. 1995. "House Members Who Become Senators: Learning from a 'Natural Experiment' inRepresentation." Legislative Studies Quarterly 20 (4): 513-29.
17. Hahn, Jinyong, PetraTodd, andWilbert van derKlaauw. 2001. "Identification and Estimation of Treatment Effects with a Regression-Discontinuity Design." Econometrica 69: 201-09. (Pubitemid 33635744)
18. Heckman, James J., Hidehiko Ichimura, Jeffrey Smith, and Petra Todd. 1998. "Characterizing Selection Bias Using Experimental Data." Econometrica 66 (5): 1017-98. (Pubitemid 128467217)
19. Heckman, James J., Hidehiko Ichimura, and Petra Todd. 1998. "Matching as an Econometric Evaluation Estimator." Review of Economic Studies 65 (2): 261-94. (Pubitemid 128467263)
20. Holland, PaulW. 1986. "Statistics and Causal Inference." Journal of the American Statistical Association 81 (396): 945-60.
21. Kaushik, Susheela. 1992. "Women and Political Participation." In Women in Politics: Forms and Processes, ed. Kamala Sankaran. New Delhi: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.
22. Kishwar, Madhu. 1996. "Women and Politics: Beyond Quotas." Economic and Political Weekly 31 (43): 2867-74. (Pubitemid 127020059)
23. Krasno, Jonathan S., and Donald P. Green. 2008. "Do Televised Presidential Ads Increase Voter Turnout? Evidence from a Natural Experiment." Journal of Politics 70 (1): 245-61.
24. Lassen, DavidD. 2005. "The Effect of Information onVoter Turnout: Evidence from a Natural Experiment." American Journal of Political Science 49 (1): 103-18. (Pubitemid 41602057)
25. Lee, David S. 2008. "Randomized Experiments from Non-random Selection in U.S. House Elections." Journal of Econometrics 142 (2): 675-97. (Pubitemid 350245707)
26. Neyman, Jerzy. [1923] 1990. "On the Application of Probability Theory to Agricultural Experiments. Essay on Principles. Section 9." Statistical Science 5 (4): 465-72.
27. Dorota M. Dabrowska and Terence P. Speed. Posner, Daniel N. 2004. "The Political Salience of Cultural Difference: Why Chewas and Tumbukas Are Allies in Zambia and Adversaries in Malawi." American Political Science Review 98 (4): 529-45. (Pubitemid 40046037)
28. Rosenbaum, Paul R. 2004. "Design Sensitivity in Observational Studies." Biometrika 91 (1): 153-64. (Pubitemid 41309843)
29. Rosenbaum, Paul R. 2010. Design of Observational Studies. New York: Springer-Verlag.
30. Rubin, Donald B. 1974. "Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies." Journal of Educational Psychology 66 (6): 688-701.
31. Sekhon, Jasjeet S. 2008. "The Neyman-RubinModel of Causal Inference andEstimation via Matching Methods." In TheOxfordHandbook of Political Methodology, eds. Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier, Henry E. Brady, and David Collier. New York: Oxford University Press, 271-99.
32. Sekhon, Jasjeet S. 2010. "Opiates for the Matches: Matching Methods for Causal Inference." Annual Review of Political Science 12: 487-508.
33. Sekhon, Jasjeet S. 2011. "Matching: Multivariate and Propensity Score Matching with Automated Balance Search." Journal of Statistical Software 42 (7): 1-52. http://sekhon.berkeley.edu/matching/(accessed November 16, 2011).
34. Sekhon, Jasjeet S., and Richard Grieve. N.D. "A Non-parametric Matching Method for Bias Adjustment with Applications to Economic Evaluations." Health Economics. Forthcoming.
35. Singh, Gopal Simrita,Medha Kotwal Lele, Nirmala Sathe,Wandana Sonalkar, and Anjali Maydeo. 1992. "Participation of Women in Electoral Politics in Maharashtra." In Women in Politics: Forms and Processes, ed. Kamala Sankaran. New Delhi: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, 63-108.
36. van der Brug,Wouter. 2001. "Perceptions, Opinions and Party Preferences in the Face of a RealWorld Event: Chernobyl as a Natural Experiment in Political Psychology." Journal of Theoretical Politics 13 (1): 53-80. (Pubitemid 33580328)
37. Whitford, Andrew B. 2002. "Decentralization and Political Control of the Bureaucracy." Journal of Theoretical Politics 14 (2): 167-93. (Pubitemid 36703846)