Slit seeded grass-legume mixture improves coal mine reclamation

Plant, Soil and Environment

Volumn 58, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 68-75

  Ruzek L ^a   Ruzkova M ^b   Vorisek K ^a   Vrablikova J ^c   Vrablik P ^c  

^a CZECH UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES PRAGUE   (Czech Republic)

^b CENTRAL INSTITUTE FOR SUPERVISING AND TESTING IN AGRICULTURE   (Czech Republic)

^c J E PURKINJE UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Bark substrate; Coronilla varia L.; Festuca pratensis L.; Lotus corniculatus L.; Microbial biomass; Paper mill waste; Respiration; Soil organic carbon; Wastewater sludge

Indexed keywords

CALAMAGROSTIS EPIGEIOS; FESTUCA PRATENSIS; FESTUCA RUBRA; GALIUM; GALIUM APARINE; LEPIDIUM DRABA; LOTUS CORNICULATUS; MEDICAGO; MEDICAGO LUPULINA; SECURIGERA VARIA; URTICA DIOICA;

EID: 84857941087     PISSN: 12141178     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.17221/397/2011-pse     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Anderson J.D., Ingram L.J., Stahl P.D. (2008): Influence of reclamation management practices on microbial biomass carbon and soil organic carbon accumulation in semiarid mined lands of Wyoming. Applied Soil Ecology, 40: 387-397.
2. Beauchamp C.J., Camiré C., Chalifour F.P. (2006): Use of bark and combined paper sludge, for the revegetation of bark-covered land. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science, 5: 253-261.
3. Blagodatskiy S.A., Blagodatskaya E.V., Gorbenko A.Y., Panikov N.S. (1987): A re-hydration method of determining the biomass of micro-organisms in soil. Soviet Soil Science, 19: 119-126.
4. Chodak M., Pietrzykowski M., Niklinska M. (2009): Development of microbial properties in a chronosequence of sandy mine soils. Applied Soil Ecology, 41: 259-268.
5. Christl I., Knicker H., Kögel-Knabner I., Kretzschmar R. (2000): Chemical heterogeneity of humic substances: characterization of size fractions obtained by hollow-fibre ultrafiltration. European Journal of Soil Science, 51: 617-625.
6. Dunker M., Nordmeyer H. (2000): Reasons for the distribution of weed species on arable fields - field and greenhouse experiments concerning the influence of soil properties. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, S7: 55-62.
7. Dygus K.H. (2002): The variability of vegetation in a forest ecosystem disturbed by the long-term impact of starch sewage treatment. Ecological Questions, 1: 97-109.
8. EN 13342 (2000): Characterization of sludges. Determination of Kjeldahl Nitrogen. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.
9. Evanylo G.K., Abaye A.O., Dundas C., Zipper C.E., Lemus R., Sukkariyah B., Rockett J. (2005): Herbaceous vegetation productivity, persistence, and metals uptake on a biosolids-amended mine soil. Journal of Environmental Quality, 34: 1811-1819.
10. Harris J.A. (2009): Soil microbial communities and restoration ecology: Facilitators or followers? Science, 325: 573-574.
11. Harris J.A. (2003): Measurements of the soil microbial community for estimating the success of restoration. European Journal of Soil Science, 54: 801-808.
12. Islam K.R., Weil R.R. (1998): A rapid microwave digestion method for colorimetric measurement of soil organic carbon. Communication in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 29: 2269-2284.
13. ISO 16072 (2002): Soil quality - Laboratory method for determination of microbial soil respiration. International Organization for Standardization, Geneve.
14. ISO 11277 (1998): Soil quality - determination of particle size distribution in mineral soil material. Method by sieving and sedimentation following removal of soluble salt organic matter and carbonates. International Organization for Standardization, Geneve, 30.
15. Jasper D.A. (2007): Beneficial soil microorganisms of the Jarrah forest and their recovery in bauxite Southwestern Australia. Restoration Ecology, 15: S74-S84.
16. th International Soil Science Conference, Vol. 1, Research Institute for Soil Improvement, Prague, 135-138.
17. Prach K., Pyšek P. (1999): How do species dominating in succession differ from others? Journal of Vegetation Science, 10: 383-392.
18. Růžek L., Růžková M., Voříšek K., Kubát J., Friedlová M., Mikanová O. (2009): Chemical and microbiological characterization of Cambisols, Luvisols and Stagnosols. Plant, Soil and Environment, 55: 231-237.
19. Růžek L., Voříšek K., Nováková M., Strnadová S. (2006): Microbial, chemical and textural parameters of main soil taxonomical units of Czech Republic. Plant, Soil and Environment, 52: S29-S35.
20. Růžek L., Voříšek K., Vráblíková J., Strnadová S., Vráblík P. (2003): Chemical and biological characteristics of reclaimed soils in the Most region (Czech Republic). Plant, Soil and Environment, 49: 346-351.
21. Růžková M., Růžek L., Voříšek K., Vráblík P., Musilová D. (2011): Microbiological characterization of land set-aside before and after Roundup desiccation. Plant, Soil and Environment, 57: 88-94.
22. Schnitzer M., Khan S.U. (1972): Humic Substances in the Environment. Marcel Dekker, New York, 327.
23. Swift R.S. (1996): Organic matter characterization. In: Sparks D.L., Page A.L., Helmke P.A., Loeppert R.H., Soltanpour P.N., Tabatabai N.A., Jonson C.T., Summer M.E. (eds.): Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 3, Chemical Methods, SSSA Book Series 5, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, 1018-1020.
24. Tripathy S., Bhattacharyya P., Equeenuddin S.M., Kim K., Kulkarni H.D. (2008): Comparison of microbial indicators under two water regimes in a soil amended with combined paper mill sludge and decomposed cow manure. Chemosphere, 71: 168-175.