Rewards and punishments in iterated decision making: An explanation for the frequency of the contingent event effect

Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling, ICCM 2010

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 175-180

  Napoli, Antonio ^a   Fum, Danilo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRIESTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

ACT R; Feedback; Iowa gambling task; Iterated decision making; Reinforcement learning

Indexed keywords

ACT-R; COGNITIVE ARCHITECTURES; COMPUTATIONAL MODEL; CONTINGENT EVENT; DECISION PROBLEMS; EXPECTED VALUES; IOWA GAMBLING TASK;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; EXPERIMENTS; FEEDBACK; REINFORCEMENT LEARNING;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 84857932876     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Ahn, W.-Y., Busemeyer, J. R., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Stout, J. (2008). Comparison of decision learning models using the generalization criterion method. Cognitive Science, 32(8), 1376-1402.
2. Anderson, J. R. (2007). How can the human mind occur in the physical universe? New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Bechara, A., Damasio, A., Damasio, H., & Anderson, S. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50, 7-15.
4. Bechara, A., Tranel, D., & Damasio, H. (2000). Characterization of the decision-making deficit of patients with ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions. Brain, 123, 2189-2202.
5. Bush, R. R., & Mosteller, F. (1955). Stochastic models for learning. New York: Wiley.
6. Chiu, Y.-C., Lin, C.-H., Huang, J.-T., Lin, S., Lee, P.-L., & Hsieh, J.-C. (2008). Immediate gain is long-term loss: Are there foresighted decision makers in the Iowa Gambling Task? Behavioral and Brain Functions, 4, 13.
7. Dunn, B. D., Dalgleish, T., & Lawrence, A. D. (2006). The somatic marker hypothesis: a critical evaluation. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(2), 239-71.
8. Fum, D., Napoli, A., & Stocco, A. (2008). Somatic markers and frequency effects: Does emotion really play a role on decision making in the Iowa Gambling Task? In Proceedings of 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1203-1208).
9. Stocco, A., Fum, D., & Napoli, A. (2009). Dissociable processes underlying decisions in the Iowa Gambling Task: a new integrative framework. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 5, 1.
10. Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1998). Reinforcement learning: An introduction. Cambridge, MA: Oxford University Press.
11. Yechiam, E., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2005). Comparison of basic assumptions embedded in learning models for experience-based decision making. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 387-402.