Interpretation of health and vision utilities in low vision patients

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 89, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 288-295

  Malkin, Alexis G ^a,b   Goldstein, Judith E ^a   Massof, Robert W ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Lions Vision Center   (United States)

Author keywords

health state; logit scale; quality of life; standard gamble; time trade off

Indexed keywords

LOGIT SCALE; LOW VISION; META-ANALYSIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; STANDARD GAMBLE; TELEPHONE SURVEY; TIME TRADE OFF; TRADE OFF;

COMMERCE; QUALITY CONTROL; SURVEYS;

HEALTH;

AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; MALE; PATHOLOGICAL GAMBLING; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; QUESTIONNAIRE; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL DISORDER;

AGED; FEMALE; GAMBLING; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; MALE; QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS; QUESTIONNAIRES; VISION, LOW; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 84857912499     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318241720f     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Weinstein MC, Siegel JE, Gold MR, Kamlet MS, Russell LB. Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine. JAMA 1996;276:1253-8.
2. Torrance GW, Boyle MH, Horwood SP. Application of multiattribute utility theory to measure social preferences for health states. Oper Res 1982;30:1043-69.
3. Jo MW, Yun SC, Lee SI. Estimating quality weights for EQ-5D health states with the time trade-off method in South Korea. Value Health 2008;11:1186-9.
4. Hill AR, Aspinall PA, Armbrecht A, Dhillon B, Buchholz P. Identifying low vision rehabilitation priorities using a conjoint analysis approach. Int Congr Ser 2005;1282:573-7.
5. Torrance GW, Furlong W, Feeny D. Health utility estimation. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2002;2:99-108.
6. Kymes SM, Lee BS. Preference-based quality of life measures in people with visual impairment. Optom Vis Sci 2007;84:809-16.
7. Kymes SM. The role of preference-based measures of health States: How can we use the vision preference value scale? Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:1765-6.
8. Frick KD, Massof RW. Use of global visual acuity data in a time trade-off approach to calculate the cost utility of cataract surgery: Methodological issues of cost-utility comparisons. Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127:1205-6.
9. Kymes SM, Frick KD. Value based medicine. Br J Ophthalmol 2005; 89:643-4.
10. Lee BS, Kymes SM, Nease RF, Jr., Sumner W, Siegfried CJ, Gordon MO. The impact of anchor point on utilities for 5 common ophthalmic diseases. Ophthalmology 2008;115:898-903.e4.
11. Drummond MF, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1987.
12. Torrance GW. Toward a utility theory foundation for health status index models. Health Serv Res 1976;11:349-69.
13. Brown MM, Brown GC, Sharma S, Landy J. Health care economic analyses and value-based medicine. Surv Ophthalmol 2003;48: 204-23.
14. Puhan MA, Schunemann HJ, Wong E, Griffith L, Guyatt GH. The standard gamble showed better construct validity than the time tradeoff. J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60:1029-33.
15. Weinstein MC, Torrance G, McGuire A. QALYs: The basics. Value Health 2009;12(Suppl. 1):S5-9.
16. Gerson LB, Ullah N, Hastie T, Triadafilopoulos G, Goldstein M. Patient-derived health state utilities for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100:524-33.
17. Real FJ, Brown GC, Brown HC, Brown MM. The effect of comorbidities upon ocular and systemic health-related quality of life. Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92:770-4.
18. Sharma S, Brown GC, Brown MM, Hollands H, Robins R, Shah GK. Validity of the time trade-off and standard gamble methods of utility assessment in retinal patients. Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86: 493-6.
19. van Wijck EE, Bosch JL, Hunink MG. Time-tradeoff values and standard-gamble utilities assessed during telephone interviews versus face-to-face interviews. Med Decis Making 1998;18:400-5.
20. Furlong WJ, Feeny DH, Torrance GW, Barr RD. The Health Utilities Index (HUI) system for assessing health-related quality of life in clinical studies. Ann Med 2001;33:375-84.
21. Bleichrodt H, Johannesson M. Standard gamble, time trade-off and rating scale: Experimental results on the ranking properties of QALYs. J Health Econ 1997;16:155-75.
22. McNamee P, Glendinning S, Shenfine J, Steen N, Griffin SM, Bond J. Chained time trade-off and standard gamble methods. Applications in oesophageal cancer. Eur J Health Econ 2004;5: 81-6.
23. Lin MR, Hwang HF, Chung KP, Huang C, Chen CY. Rating scale, standard gamble, and time trade-off for people with traumatic spinal cord injuries. Phys Ther 2006;86:337-44.
24. Espallargues M, Czoski-Murray CJ, Bansback NJ, Carlton J, Lewis GM, Hughes LA, Brand CS, Brazier JE. The impact of age-related macular degeneration on health status utility values. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:4016-23.
25. Shah VA, Gupta SK, Shah KV, Vinjamaram S, Chalam KV. TTO utility scores measure quality of life in patients with visual morbidity due to diabetic retinopathy or ARMD. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2004;11:43-51.