Association of fetal cranial shape with shoulder dystocia

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 304-309

  Belfort, M A ^a,b   White, G L ^a,b   Vermeulen, F M ^b,c  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b St Mark's Hospital Salt Lake City   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

multivariable prediction; occipitofrontal diameter; occipitofrontal diameter biparietal diameter ratio; shoulder dystocia; shoulder dystocia prediction

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CEPHALOMETRY; CONGENITAL MALFORMATION; DELIVERY; DYSTOCIA; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FETUS WEIGHT; FRONTAL BONE; HUMAN; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OCCIPITAL BONE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY DIABETES MELLITUS; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SHOULDER; SKULL;

CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CEPHALOMETRY; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; DYSTOCIA; FEMALE; FETAL WEIGHT; FRONTAL BONE; HUMANS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OCCIPITAL BONE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY IN DIABETICS; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SHOULDER; SKULL;

EID: 84857893817     PISSN: 09607692     EISSN: 14690705     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/uog.9066     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Shoulder dystocia. ACOG practice bulletin clinical management guidelines for obstetrician- gynecologists. Number 40, November 2002. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100: 1045-1050.
2. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Shoulder Dystocia. ACOG: Washington DC, 1997.
3. Gherman RB,. Shoulder dystocia: an evidence-based evaluation of the obstetric nightmare. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2002; 45: 345-362. (Pubitemid 34618500)
4. Mansor A, Arumugam K, Omar S,. Macrosomia is the only reliable predictor of shoulder dystocia in babies weighing 3.5 kg or more. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010; 149: 44-46.
5. Gottlieb A, Galan H,. Shoulder dystocia: an update. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 2007; 34: 501-531. (Pubitemid 47503683)
6. Dildy G, Clark S,. Shouler dystocia: risk identification. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2000; 43: 265-282.
7. Heiskanen N, Raatikainen K, Heinonen S,. Fetal macrosomia†"a continuing obstetric challenge. Biol Neonate 2006; 90: 98-103. (Pubitemid 44197476)
8. Langer O, Berkus MD, Huff RW, Samueloff A,. Shoulder dystocia: should the fetus weighing greater than or equal to 4,000 grams be delivered by cesarean section? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 165: 831-837.
9. Poggi SH, Stallings SP, Ghidini A, Spong CY, Deering SH, Allen RH,. Intrapartum risk factors for permanent brachial plexus injury. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189: 725-729. (Pubitemid 37194094)
10. Belfort M, Dildy G, Saade G, Suarez V, Clark S,. Prediction of shoulder dystocia using multivariate analysis. Am J Perinatol 2007; 24: 5-10. (Pubitemid 46239708)
11. Benson C, Doubilet P,. Songraphic prediction of gestational age: accuracy of second- and third-trimester fetal measurements. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991; 157: 1275-1277.
12. Ohtsuki F,. Developmental changes of the cranial bone thickness in the human fetal period. Am J Phys Anthropol 1977; 46: 141-153.
13. Hadlock FP, Kent WR, Loyd JL, Harrist RB, Deter RL, Park SK,. An evaluation of two methods for measuring fetal head and body circumferences. J Ultrasound Med 1982; 1: 359-360. (Pubitemid 13192376)
14. Hadlock F, Harrist R, Sharman R, Deter R, Park S,. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurementsâ€"a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 151: 333-337. (Pubitemid 15237550)
15. Burd I, Srinivas S, Pare E, Dharan V, Wang E,. Is sonographic assessment of fetal weight influenced by formula selection? J Ultrasound Med 2009; 28: 1019-1024.
16. Alexander G, Himes J, Kaufman R, Mor J, Kogan M,. A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87: 163-168. (Pubitemid 26033124)
17. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clark-Pearson DL,. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988; 44: 837-845.
18. Chauhan S, Hendrix N, Magann E, Morrison J, Kenney S, Devoe L,. Limitations of clinical and sonographic estimates of birth weight: experience with 1034 patrurients. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 91: 72-77. (Pubitemid 28042336)