Automatic evaluation of ontologies

Natural Language Processing and Text Mining

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 193-219

  Brank, Janez ^a   Grobelnik, Marko ^a   Mladenić, Dunja ^a  

^a JO EF STEFAN INSTITUTE   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857877292     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-84628-754-1_11     Document Type: Chapter

References (28)

1. Bloehdorn S, Haase P, Sure Y, Voelker J, Bevk M, Bontcheva K, Roberts I (2005) Report on the integration of ML, HLT and OM. SEKT Deliverable D.6.6.1, July 2005.
2. Brewster C, Alani H, Dasmahapatra S, Wilks Y (2004) Data driven ontology evaluation. In: Proceedings of the Int. Conf. on Language Resources and Evaluation, Lisbon, Portugal, 26-28 May 2004.
3. Burton-Jones A, Storey V C, Sugumaran V, Ahluwalia P (2004) A semiotic metrics suite for assessing the quality of ontologies. Data and Knowledge Engineering 55(1):84-102.
4. Chawathe S S, Rajaraman A, Garcia-Molina H, Widom J (1996). Change Detection in Hierarchically Structured Information. In: Proc. of the ACM SIGMOD Conference, pp. 493-504, 1996.
5. Ding L, Finin T, Joshi A, Pan R, Cost R S, Peng Y, Reddivari P, Doshi V, Sachs J (2004). Swoogle: A search and metadata engine for the semantic web. In: Proc. ACM Conf. on Information and Knowledge Mgmt, pp. 652-659, 2004.
6. Ehrig M, Haase P, Hefke M, Stojanovic N (2005). Similarity for ontologies-A comprehensive framework. In: Proc. 13th Eur. Conf. Information Sys., 2005.
7. Fox M S, Barbuceanu M, Gruninger M, Lin J (1998). An organization ontology for enterprise modelling. In: Prietula M et al. (eds.) Simulating organizations: Computational models of institutions and groups, AAAI/MIT Press, 1998, pp. 131-152.
8. Ǵomez-Ṕerez A (1994) Some ideas and examples to evaluate ontologies. Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Stanford University, 1994.
9. Ǵomez-Ṕerez A (1996) Towards a framework to verify knowledge sharing technology. Expert Systems with Applications, 11(114):519-529.
10. Grobelnik M, Mladeníc D (2005) Automated Knowledge Discovery in Advanced Knowledge Management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(5):132-149.
11. Guarino N, Welty C (2002) Evaluating ontological decisions with Onto Clean. Communications of the ACM, 45(2):61-65, February 2002.
12. Hartmann J, Spyns P, Giboin A, Maynard D, Cuel R, Súarez-Figueroa M C, Sure Y (2005) Methods for ontology evaluation. Knowledge Web Deliverable D1.2.3, January 2005.
13. Haussler, D (1999) Convolution kernels on discrete structures. Technical report, DePARTment of Computer Science, University of California at Santa Cruz, 1999.
14. Levenshtein VI (1966) Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Soviet Physics Doklady 10(8):707-710.
15. Lozano-Tello A, Ǵomez-Ṕerez A (2004) Ontometric: A method to choose the appropriate ontology. Journal of Database Management, 15(2):1-18.
16. Maedche A, Staab S (2002) Measuring similarity between ontologies. In: Proc. 13th Conf. on Information and Knowledge Mgmt. (2002). LNAI vol. 2473.
17. Meila M (2003) Comparing clusterings by the variation of information. In: Proc. of the 16th Annual Conference on Computational Learning Theory, 2003.
18. Meila M (2005) Comparing clusterings-An axiomatic view. In: Proc. of the Int. Conference on Machine Learning, 2005.
19. Mladeníc D (1998) Machine Learning on non-homogeneous, distributed text data. Ph.D. thesis, University of Ljubljana, 1998.
20. Mladeníc D, Grobelnik M (2003) Feature selection on hierarchy of web documents. Journal of Decision support systems, 35:45-87.
21. Patel C, Supekar K, Lee Y, Park E K (2004) Onto Khoj: A semantic web portal for ontology searching, ranking and classification. In: Proc. of the 5th ACM Workshop on Web Information and Data Mgmt, New Orleans, USA, 2004.
22. Porzel R, Malaka R (2004) A task-based approach for ontology evaluation. In: Proc. ECAI 2004 Workshop on Ontology Learning and Population, pp. 9-16.
23. Rada R, Mili H, Bicknell E, Blettner M (1989) Development and application of a metric on semantic nets. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 19(1):17-30.
24. Rand W M (1971) Objective criteria for the evaluation of clustering methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66:846-850.
25. Spyns P (2005) EvaLexon: Assessing triples mined from texts. Technical Report 09, STAR Lab, Brussels, 2005.
26. Supekar K (2005) A peer-review approach for ontology evaluation. In: Proceedings of the Int. Prot́eǵe Conf., Madrid, Spain, 2005.
27. Velardi P, Navigli R, Cucchiarelli A, Neri F (2005) Evaluation of OntoLearn, a methodology for automatic learning of domain ontologies. In: Buitelaar P, Cimiano P, Magnini B (eds) Ontology Learning from Text: Methods, Evaluation and Applications, IOS Press, 2005.
28. Völker J, Vrandecic D, Sure Y (2005) Automatic evaluation of ontologies (AEON). In: Proceedings 4th International Semantic Web Conference, 2005.