Nurse-run, telephone-based outreach to improve lipids in people with diabetes

American Journal of Managed Care

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 77-84

  Fischer, Henry H ^a,c   Eisert, Sheri L ^a,b,c   Everhart, Rachel M ^a   Durfee, Michael J ^a   Moore, Susan L ^a   Soria, Stanley ^a   Stell, Diana I ^a   Rice Peterson, Cecilia M ^a   MacKenzie, Thomas D ^a,c   Estacio, Raymond O ^a,c  

^a DENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITAL AUTHORITY   (United States)

^b Global Health and Health Disparities   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTILIPEMIC AGENT; LIPID; LOW DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN;

ADOLESCENT; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR CHANGE; BLOOD PRESSURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITAL CHARGE; HUMAN; LIPOPROTEIN BLOOD LEVEL; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NURSE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PUBLIC HEALTH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SELF CARE; TELECONSULTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; CASE MANAGEMENT; COLORADO; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DIABETES MELLITUS; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HUMANS; LIPOPROTEINS, LDL; MEDICALLY UNINSURED; MOTIVATION; NURSING CARE; PATIENT ADMISSION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SELF CARE; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 84857867544     PISSN: 10880224     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2007. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(3):596-615.
2. Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(5):1047-1053. (Pubitemid 38579764)
3. Hogan P, Dall T, Nikolov P; American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the US in 2002. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(3):917- 932.
4. Smith DG. Epidemiology of dyslipidemia and economic burden on the healthcare system. Am J Manag Care. 2007;13(suppl 3):S68-S71.
5. Saaddine JB, Cadwell B, Gregg EW, et al. Improvements in diabetes processes of care and intermediate outcomes: United States, 1988-2002. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(7):465-474. (Pubitemid 46780669)
6. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive bloodglucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet. 1998;352(9131):837-853.
7. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(14):977-986.
8. Rothman AA, Wagner EH. Chronic illness management: what is the role of primary care? Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(3):256-261. (Pubitemid 36231639)
9. Holman H, Lorig K. Patient self-management: a key to effectiveness and efficiency in care of chronic disease. Public Health Reports. 2004;119(3):239-243. (Pubitemid 38868447)
10. Mangione CM, Gerzoff RB, Williamson DF, et al TRIAD Study Group. The association between quality of care and the intensity of diabetes disease management programs. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145(2):107-116. (Pubitemid 46780584)
11. Shojania KG, Ranji SR, McDonald KM, et al. Effects of quality improvement strategies for type 2 diabetes on glycemic control: a metaregression analysis. JAMA. 2006;296(4):427-440. (Pubitemid 44127527)
12. Piette JD, Weinberger M, Kraemer FB, McPhee SJ. Impact of automated calls with nurse follow-up on diabetes treatment outcomes in a Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(2):202-208. (Pubitemid 32119112)
13. Shea S, Weinstock RS, Starren J, et al. A randomized trial comparing telemedicine case management with usual care in older, ethnically diverse, medically underserved patients with diabetes mellitus. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13(1):40-51. (Pubitemid 41828334)
14. Kim HS, Oh JA. Adherence to diabetes control recommendations: impact of nurse telephone calls. J Adv Nurs. 2003;44(3):256-261.
15. Stone RA, Rao RH, Sevick MR, et al. Active care management supported by home telemonitoring in veterans with type 2 diabetes: the DiaTel randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(3):478-484.
16. Fischer H, Mackenzie T, McCullen K, Everhart R, Estacio RO. Design of a nurse-run, telephone-based intervention to improve lipids in diabetes. Contemp Clin Trials. 2008;29(5):809-816.
17. National Heart Lung and Blood Institute. Third Report of the Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/cholesterol/. Accessed October 4, 2011.
18. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(suppl 1):S4-S36.
19. National Heart Lung and Blood Institute. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure - Complete Report. http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/ hypertension/jnc7full.htm. Accessed November 4, 2009.
20. Kronick R, Gilmer T, Dreyfus T, Lee L. Improving health-based payment for Medicaid benefi ciaries: CDPS. Health Care Financ Rev. 2000;21(3):29-64.
21. Piette, JD, Weinberger M, McPhee SH, Mah CA, Kraemer FB, Crapo LM. Do automated calls with nurse follow-up improve self-care and glycemic control among vulnerable patients with diabetes? Am J Med. 2000;108(1):20-27. (Pubitemid 30058274)
22. Bodenheimer T. The future of primary care: transforming practice. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(20):2086, 2089.
23. Feise RJ. Do multiple outcome measures require P-value adjustment? BMC Med Res Methodol. 2002;2:8.