Impact of the deepwater horizon well blowout on the economics of US gulf fisheries

Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences

Volumn 69, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 499-510

  Sumaila, U Rashid ^a   Cisneros Montemayor, Andrés M ^a   Dyck, Andrew ^a   Huang, Ling ^a,c   Cheung, William ^a,b   Jacquet, Jennifer ^a   Kleisner, Kristin ^a   Lam, Vicky ^a   Mccrea Strub, Ashley ^a   Swartz, Wilf ^a   Watson, Reg ^a   Zeller, Dirk ^a   Pauly, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLOWOUT; COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY; DEEP WATER; ECONOMIC IMPACT; FISH; FISHERY ECONOMICS; FISHING; MARICULTURE; OIL SPILL; PROFITABILITY; RECREATIONAL ACTIVITY; WELL TECHNOLOGY;

ATLANTIC OCEAN; GULF OF MEXICO; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84857864009     PISSN: 0706652X     EISSN: 12057533     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/F2011-171     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bhat, M.G., and Bhatta, R. 2006. Regional economic impacts of limited entry fishery management: an application of dynamic input-output model. Environ. Dev. Econ. 11(6): 709-728. doi:10.1017/S1355770X06003238.
2. Dyck, A.J., and Sumaila, U.R. 2010. Economic impact of ocean fish populations in the global fishery. J. Bioeconomics, 12(3): 227-243. doi:10.1007/s10818-010-9088-3.
3. Heen, K. 1989. Impact analysis of multispecies marine resource management. Mar. Resour. Econ. 6(4): 331-348.
4. Hoagland, P., Jin, D., Thunberg, E., and Steinback, S. 2005. Economic activity associated with the northeast shelf large marine ecosystem: application of an input-output approach. Sustaining large marine ecosystems: the human dimension. Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. pp. 159-181.
5. Jin, D., Hoagland, P., and Dalton, T.M. 2003. Linking economic and ecological models for a marine ecosystem. Ecol. Econ. 46(3): 367-385. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.06.001.
6. Leontief, W. 1953. Domestic production and foreign trade: the American capital position re-examined. Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 97(4): 332-349.
7. Leontief, W. 1966. Input-output economics. Oxford University Press, New York.
8. Leontief, W., Morgan, A., Polenske, K., Simpson, D., and Tower, E. 1965. The economic impact - industrial and regional - of an arms cut. Rev. Econ. Stat. 47(3): 217-241. doi:10.2307/1927706.
9. Leung, P., and Pooley, S. 2001. Regional economic impacts of reductions in fisheries production: a supply-driven approach. Mar. Resour. Econ. 16(4): 251-262.
10. Loveridge, S. 2004. A typology and assessment of multi-sector regional economic impact models. Reg. Stud. 38(3): 305-317. doi:10.1080/003434042000211051.
11. Oosterhaven, J., and Stelder, D. 2002. Net multipliers avoid exaggerating impacts: with a bi-regional illustration for the Dutch transportation sector. J. Reg. Sci. 42(3): 533-543. doi:10.1111/1467-9787.00270.
12. Pontecorvo, G., Wilkinson, M., Anderson, R., and Holdowsky, M. 1980. Contribution of the ocean sector to the United States economy. Science, 208(4447): 1000-1006. doi:10.1126/science.208.4447.1000. PMID:17779011.
13. Radtke, H.D., Carter, C.N., and Davis, S.W. 2004. Economic evaluation of the northern pikeminnow management program. Report prepared for Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission, Portland, Ore.
14. Roy, N., Arnason, R., and Schrank, W.E. 2009. The identification of economic base industries, with an application to the Newfoundland fishing industry. Land Econ. 85(4): 675-691.
15. Seung, C.K., and Waters, E.C. 2006. A review of regional economic models for fisheries management in the U.S. Mar. Resour. Econ. 21(1): 101.
16. Steinback, S., Gentner, B., and Castle, J. 2004. The economic importance of marine angler expenditures in the United States [online]. NOAA Professional Paper NMFS 2. US Department of Commerce, La Jolla, Calif. Available from http://spo.nwr.noaa.gov/pp2.pdf [accessed 18 July 2011].