Comparative skull morphology of uropeltid snakes (alethinophidia: Uropeltidae) with special reference to disarticulated elements and variation

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2012, Pages

  Olori, Jennifer C ^a,b   Bell, Christopher J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT OSWEGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANATOMICAL VARIATION; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOGEOGRAPHY; BONE DEVELOPMENT; BRACHYOPHIDIUM RHODOGASTER; COMPARATIVE ANATOMY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOLUTION; FACIAL BONE; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; MONOPHYLY; NASAL BONE; NONHUMAN; OSTEOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; RHINOPHIS BLYTHII; RHINOPHIS DRUMMONDHAYI; RHINOPHIS HOMOLEPSIS; RHINOPHIS PHILIPPINUS; SEX DIFFERENCE; SKULL; SNAKE; SRI LANKA; TAXONOMIC IDENTIFICATION; UROPELTIDAE; UROPELTIS MELANOGASTER; UROPELTIS RUBROMACULATA; UROPELTIS WOODMASONI; VOMER; ANIMAL; CLASSIFICATION; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY;

ALETHINOPHIDIA; BRACHYOPHIDIUM; CRANIA; MELANOPHIDIUM; RHINOPHIS; SERPENTES; UROPELTIDAE; UROPELTIS; UROPELTIS MELANOGASTER;

ANIMALS; PHYLOGENY; SKULL; SNAKES;

EID: 84857845389     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032450     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. McDiarmid RW, Campbell JA, Touré TA, (1999) Snake species of the world: A taxonomic and geographic reference, volume 1 Washington, D.C. The Herpetologists' League.
2. Cundall D, Wallach V, Rossman DA, (1993) The systematic relationships of the snake genus Anomochilus. Zool J Linn Soc 109: 275-299.
3. Scanlon JD, Lee MSY, (2000) The Pleistocene serpent Wonambi and the early evolution of snakes. Nature 403: 416-420.
4. Tchernov E, Rieppel O, Zaher H, Polcyn MJ, Jacobs LL, (2000) A fossil snake with limbs. Science 287: 2010-2012.
5. Lee MSY, Scanlon JD, (2002) Snake phylogeny based on osteology, soft anatomy and ecology. Biological Reviews 77: 333-401.
6. Lee MSY, Hugall AF, Lawson R, Scanlon JD, (2007) Phylogeny of snakes (Serpentes): combining morphological and molecular data in likelihood, Bayesian, and parsimony analyses. Syst Biodivers 5: 371-389.
7. White ME, Kelly-Smith M, Crother BI, (2002) Higher-level snake phylogeny as inferred from 28S ribosomal DNA and morphology. In: Donnelly MA, Crother BI, Guyer C, Wake MH, White ME, editors. Ecology & evolution in the tropics. A herpetological perspective Chicago The University of Chicago Press pp. 156-173.
8. Heise PJ, Maxson LR, Dowling HG, Hedges SB, (1995) Higher-level snake phylogeny inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences of 12S rRNA and 16S rRNA genes. Mol Biol and Evol 12: 259-265.
9. Slowinski JB, Lawson R, (2002) Snake phylogeny: evidence from nuclear and mitochondrial genes. Mol Phylogenet Evol 24: 194-202.
10. Vidal N, Hedges SB, (2004) Molecular evidence for a terrestrial origin of snakes. Proc R Soc London, Ser B Suppl 271 pp. S226-S229.
11. Lawson R, Slowinski JB, Burbrink FT, (2004) A molecular approach to discerning the phylogenetic placement of the enigmatic snake Xenophidion schaeferi among the Alethinophidia. J Zool 263: 285-294.
12. Vidal N, Hedges SB, (2002) Higher-level relationships of snakes inferred from four nuclear and mitochondrial genes. C R Biol 325: 977-985.
13. Wilcox TP, Zwickl DJ, Heath TA, Hillis DM, (2002) Phylogenetic relationships of the dwarf boas and a comparison of Bayesian and bootstrap measures of phylogenetic support. Mol Phylogenet Evol 25: 361-371.
14. Gower DJ, Vidal N, Spinks JN, McCarthy CJ, (2005) The phylogenetic position of Anomochilidae (Reptilia: Serpentes): first evidence from DNA sequences. J Zool Syst Ev Res 43: 315-320.
15. Gower DJ, Captain A, Thakur SS, (2008) On the taxonomic status of Uropeltis bicatenata (Günther) (Reptilia: Serpentes: Uropeltidae). Hamadryad 33: 64-82.
16. Gans C, (1966) Liste der rezenten Amphibien und Reptilien. Uropeltidae. Mertens R, Hennig W, eds. Das Tierreich. Lieferung 84: 1-29.
17. Rieppel O, Zaher H, (2002) The skull of the Uropeltinae (Reptilia, Serpentes), with special reference to the otico-occipital region. Bull Nat Hist Mus Lond (Zool) 68: 123-130.
18. Gower DJ, (2003) Scale microornamentation of uropeltid snakes. J Morphol 258: 249-258.
19. Comeaux RS, Olori JC, Bell CJ, (2010) Cranial osteology and preliminary phylogenetic assessment of Plectrurus aureus Beddome, 1880 (Squamata: Serpentes: Uropeltidae). Zool J Linn Soc 160: 118-138.
20. Cadle JE, Dessauer HE, Gans C, Gartside DF, (1990) Phylogenetic relationships and molecular evolution in uropeltid snakes (Serpentes: Uropeltidae): allozymes and albumin immunology. Bio J Linn Soc 40: 293-320.
21. Bossuyt F, Meegaskumbura M, Beenaerts N, Gower DJ, Pethiyagoda R, et al. (2004) Local endemism within the western Ghats-Sri Lanka biodiversity hotspot. Science 306: 479-481.
22. Gans C, (1993) Fossorial amphibians and reptiles: Their distributions as environmental indicators. In: Erdelen W, Preu C, Ishwaran N, Madduma Bandara CM, editors. Proceedings of the International and Interdisciplinary Symposium, Ecology and Landscape Management in Sri Lanka pp. 189-199 Colombo, Sri Lanka, 12-26 March 1990. Margraf Scientific Books, Weikersheim.
23. Beddome RH, (1867) Descriptions and figures of five new snakes from the Madras Presidency. Madras Q J Med Sci 11: 14-16, Plates 1-2.
24. Boulenger GA, (1893) Catalogue of snakes in the British Museum (Natural History). Volume I., containing the families Typhlopidae, Glauconiidae, Boidae, Ilysiidae, Uropeltidae, Xenopeltidae, and Colubridae Aglyphae, part xiii London Trustees of the British Museum 28 plates.
25. Taylor EH, (1953) Report on a collection of Ceylonese serpents. Univ Kans Sci Bull 35: 1615-1624.
26. Rajendran MV, (1978) Uropeltis woodmasoni Theobald. Reptile Research 1: 17-21.
27. Rajendran MV, (1979) Uropeltis ocellatus Beddome: Morphology, ecology and distribution. Recording two subspecies V. {sic} ocellatus gansi and V. {sic} ocellatus krishnasami. J Madurai Kamaraj Univ 8: 97-99.
28. Rajendran MV, (1985) Studies in uropeltid snakes. Madurai Kamaraj University Publication 80 Madurai, India Madurai Kamaraj University.
29. Mahendra BC, (1984) Handbook of the snakes of India, Ceylon, Burma, Bangladesh, and Pakistan. Ann Zool 22: i-xvi 1-412.
30. Wickramasinge LJM, Vidanapathirana DR, Wickramasinge N, Ranwella PN, (2009) A new species of Rhinophis Hemprich, 1820 (Reptilia: Serpentes: Uropeltidae) from Rakwana massif, Sri Lanka. Zootaxa 2044: 1-22.
31. Baumeister KL, (1908) Beiträge zur anatomie und physiologie der Rhinophiden. Integument, Drüsen der Mundhöhle, Augen und Skeletsystem. Zool. Jahrbuch (Abt. Anat.) 26: 423-526.
32. Rieppel O, (1977) Studies on the skull of the Henophidia. J Zool (Lond) 18: 145-173.
33. Rieppel O, (1978) The evolution of the naso-frontal joint in snakes and its bearing on snake origins. Zeit Zool Syst Evolutionsforsch 16: 14-27.
34. Rieppel O, (1979) The evolution of the basicranium in the Henophidia (Reptilia, Serpentes). Zool J Linn Soc 66: 411-431.
35. Rieppel O, (1983) A comparison of the skull of Lanthanotus borneensis (Reptilia: Varanoidea) with the skull of primitive snakes. Zeit Zool Syst Evolutionsforsch 21: 81-160.
36. Duméril AMC, (1853) Prodome de la classification des reptiles ophidians. Méml'Acad Sci Inst Fr 23: 399-356.
37. Peters GCH, (1861) De serpentum familia Uropeltaceorum. G. Reimer, Berolini 2 plates.
38. Nopsca F, (1928) The genera of reptiles. Palaeobiologica 1: 163-188.
39. Bellairs Ad'A, (1949) The anterior braincase and interorbital septum of Sauropsida, with a consideration of the origin of snakes. J Linn Soc Lond 41: 482-512.
40. Bellairs Ad'A, Underwood G, (1951) The origin of snakes. Biol Rev 26: 193-237.
41. Bellairs Ad'A, Kamal AM, (1981) The chrondrocranium and the development of the skull in recent reptiles. In: Gans C, Parsons TS, editors. Biology of the Reptilia, Volume 11, Morphology F New York Academic Press pp. 1-283.
42. Gans C, (1976) Aspects of the biology of uropeltid snakes. In: Bellairs Ad'A, Cox CB, editors. Morphology and biology of reptiles. Linn Soc Symp Ser No. 3 London Academic Press pp. 191-204.
43. Gans C, (1986) Automimicry and batesian mimicry in uropeltid snakes: pigment pattern, proportions and behavior. J Bombay Nat Hist Soc 83: 152-158.
44. Gans C, Dessauer HC, Baic D, (1978) Axial differences in the musculature of uropeltid snakes: the freight-train approach to burrowing. Science 199: 189-192.
45. Wever EG, (1978) The reptile ear Princeton Princeton University Press.
46. Groombridge BC, (1979a) On the vomer in Acrochordidae (Reptilia: Serpentes), and its cladistic significance. J Zool (Lond) 189: 559-567.
47. Groombridge BC, (1979b) Variations in morphology of the superficial palate of henophidian snakes and some possible systematic implications. J Nat Hist 13: 447-476.
48. Groombridge BC, (1979c) Comments on the intermandibular muscles of snakes. J Nat Hist 13: 477-498.
49. Cundall D, Rossman DA, (1993) Cephalic anatomy of the rare Indonesian snake Anomochilus weberi. Zool J Linn Soci 109: 235-273.
50. Rieppel O, Zaher H, (2000) The intramandibular joint in squamates, and the phylogenetic relationships of the fossil snake Pachyrachis problematicus Haas. Fieldiana Geol 43: 1-69.
51. Olori JC, (2010) Digital endocasts of the cranial cavity and osseous labyrinth of the burrowing snake Uropeltis woodmasoni (Alethinophidia: Uropeltidae). Copeia 2010: 14-26.
52. Williams EE, (1959) The occipito-vertebral joint in the burrowing snakes of the family Uropeltidae. Breviora 106: 1-10.
53. Underwood G, (1967) A contribution to the classification of snakes. British Museum (Natural History) Publication No. 653 London Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History).
54. Hoffstetter R, Gasc J-P, (1969) Vertebrae and ribs of modern reptiles. In: Gans C, editors. Biology of the Reptilia, Volume 1, Morphology A New York Academic Press pp. 201-310.
55. Cundall D, Irish FJ, (2008) The snake skull. In: Gans C, Gaunt AS, Adler K, editors. Biology of the Reptilia, volume 20, Morphology H. The skull of Lepidosauria Ithaca Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles pp. 349-692.
56. Bell CJ, Mead JI, Swift SL, (2009) Cranial osteology of Moloch horridus (Reptilia: Squamata: Agamidae). Rec West Aust Mus 25: 201-237.
57. Swofford DL, (2002) PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4.0 10b. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
58. Bremer K, (1994) Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10: 295-304.
59. Maddison DR, Maddison WP, (2005) MacClade 4: Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Version 4.08.http://macclade.org.
60. Frazzetta TH, (1966) Studies on the morphology and function of the skull in the Boidae (Serpentes). Part 2. Morphology and function of the jaw apparatus in Python sebae and P. molurus. J Morphol 118: 217-296.
61. Gans C, (1973) Uropeltid snakes - survivors in a changing world. Endeavour 32: 60-65.
62. Rieppel O, (1996) Miniaturization in tetrapods: consequences for skull morphology. In: Miller PJ, editors. Miniature vertebrates: The implications of small body size. Symp Zool Soc Lond 69: 47-61.
63. Maddin HC, Olori JC, Anderson JS, (2011) A redescription of Carrolla craddocki (Lepospondyli: Brachystelechidae) based on high-resolution CT, and the impacts of miniaturization and fossoriality on morphology. J Morphol 272: 722-743.
64. Hanken J, Wake DB, (1993) Miniaturization of body size: organismal consequences and evolutionary significance. Ann Rev Ecolog Syst 24: 501-519.
65. Rieppel O, (1988) A review of the origin of snakes. Evol Bio 22: 37-130.
66. Hanken J, (1984) Miniaturization and its effects on cranial morphology in plethodontid salamanders, genus Thorius (Amphibia: Plethodontidae): I. Osteological variation. Biol J Linn Soc 23: 55-75.
67. Hanken J, (1993) Adaptation of bone growth to miniaturization of body size. In: Hall BK, editors. Bone. Vol. 7. Bone growth Boca Raton CRC Press pp. 79-104.
68. Maglia AM, Pugener LA, Mueller JA, (2007) Skeletal morphology and postmetamorphic ontogeny of Acris crepitans (Anura: Hylidae): A case of miniaturization in frogs. J Morphol 268: 194-223.
69. Wake MH, (1986) The morphology of Idiocranium russeli (Amphibia: Gymnophiona), with comments on miniaturization through heterochrony. J Morphol 189: 1-16.
70. Yeh J, (2002) The effect of miniaturized body size on skeletal morphology in frogs. Evolution 56: 628-641.
71. Rieppel O, Maisano JA, (2007) The skull of the rare malaysian snake Anomochilus leonardi Smith, based on high-resolution x-ray computed tomography. Zool J Linn Soc 149: 671-685.
72. Hanken J, (1983) Miniaturization and its effects on cranial morphology in plethodontid salamanders, genus Thorius (Amphibia: Plethodontidae): II. The fate of the brain and sense organs and their role in skull morphogenesis and evolution. Journal of Morphology 177: 255-268.
73. Rieppel O, (1984) Miniaturization of the lizard skull: its functional and evolutionary implications. In: Ferguson MWJ, editor. The structure, development and evolution of reptiles. Symp Zool Soc Lond 52: 503-520.
74. Carroll RL, (1990) A tiny microsaur from the Lower Permian of Texas: size constraints in Palaeozoic tetrapods. Palaeontology 33: 893-909.
75. Mahendra BC, (1938) Some remarks on the phylogeny of the Ophidia. Anat Anz 186: 347-356.
76. Estes R, Gauthier J, de Queiroz K, (1988) Phylogenetic relationships within Squamata. In: Estes R, Pregill G, editors. Phylogenetic relationships of the lizard families: essays commemorating Charles L. Camp San Francisco Stanford University Press pp. 119-282.
77. Rieppel O, (1980) The evolution of the ophidian feeding system. Zool JB Anat 103: 551-564.