The transfer of Tax Increment Financing (TIF) as an urban policy for spatially targeted economic development

Land Use Policy

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 817-826

  Squires, Graham ^a   Lord, Alexander Duncan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Economic development; Spatial planning; Tax Increment Financing; Urban policy; Urban regeneration; Urban renewal

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; SPATIAL PLANNING; STAKEHOLDER; TAX SYSTEM; URBAN POLICY; URBAN RENEWAL;

UNITED KINGDOM; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84857802282     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.12.007     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Adair A., Berry J., McGreal S. Financing property's contribution to regeneration. Urban Studies 2003, 40(5):1065-1080.
2. APUDG (All Party Urban Development Group) Next Steps: A Regeneration Agenda for the Next Government 2010, HMSO.
3. Barker C. Cultural Studies: Theory and Practice 2005, Sage, London.
4. BPF (British Property Federation) Tax Increment Financing: A New Tool for Funding Regeneration in the UK? 2008, British Property Federation.
5. BPF (British Property Federation) Regeneration to enable growth: What Government is doing in support of community-led regeneration 2011, A submission to the Communities and Local Government (CLG) Select Committee.
6. Bryman A. Social Research Methods 2004, Oxford Press.
7. CLG Structural Reform Plan Monthly Implementation Update 2010, Communities and Local Government.
8. Cochrane A. Illusions of power: interviewing local elites. Environment and Planning A 1998, 30.
9. Cook I. Mobilising urban policies: the policy transfer of US business improvement districts to England and Wales. Urban Studies 2008, 45(4):773-795.
10. The landscape of qualitative research. Theories and Issues 2003, Sage Publications, London. N. Denzin, Y. Lincoln (Eds.).
11. Dolowitz D., Marsh D. Who learns from whom: a review of the policy transfer literature. Political Studies 1996, 44(2):343-357.
12. Dolowitz D., Marsh D. Learning from abroad: the role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration 2000, 13(1):5-24.
13. DSD (Department for Social Development) Urban Development Grants 2011, DSD Northern Ireland Executive.
14. Dwyer P., Ellison N. 'We nicked stuff from all over the place': policy transfer or muddling through?. Policy and Politics 2009, 37(2):389-407.
15. Dye R., Merriman D. The effects of tax increment financing on economic development. The Journal of Urban Economics 2000, 47(2):306-328.
16. Evans M., Davies J. Understanding policy transfer: a multi-level, multi-disciplinary perspective. Public Administration 1999, 77(2):361-385.
17. Goodhall P. Urban Development Grant - an early assessment of regional implications. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 1985, 28(1):40-42.
18. Hambleton R. Cross-national lesson drawing for planning - taking advantage of globalization. Paper Presentation for AESOP 2007.
19. Harvey D. A Brief History of Neoliberalism 2007, Oxford University Press.
20. HM Treasury Tax Increment Financing. Parliament Constitution Centre 2011, HMSO.
21. HM Treasury 2011 Budget Statement by the Chancellor of the Exchequer, the Rt Hon George Osborne MP 2011, HMSO.
22. Hulme R. The role of policy transfer in assessing the impact of American ideas on British social policy. Global Social Policy 2006, 6(2):173-195.
23. James O., Lodge M. The limitations of 'policy transfer' and 'lesson drawing' for public policy research. Political Studies Review 2003, 1:179-193.
24. Lilleker D. Interviewing the political elite: navigating a potential minefield. Politics 2003, 23(3).
25. Lloyd G., McCarthy J., McGreal S. Business improvement districts. International Planning Studies 2003, 8(4):295-321.
26. Lloyd G., McCarthy J., McGreal S., Berry J. A Comparative Analysis of Tax-based Mechanisms in the Urban Regeneration 2001, RICS Foundation.
27. Lloyd G., McCarthy J., McGreal S., Berry J. Tax incentives for urban regeneration in Europe - some comparative evidence. Paper Presented at EURA Conference 2002.
28. Massey D. Enterprise zones: a political issue. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 1982, 6:429-434.
29. McGreal S., Berry J., Lloyd G. Tax-based mechanisms in urban regeneration: Dublin and Chicago models. Urban Studies 2002, 39:1819.
30. Meyer P. Meaning and action in local economic development strategies - a comparison of policies in Britain and the United States. Environment and Planning C - Government and Policy 1991, 9:383-398.
31. Meyer P., Kraushaar R. The grass is always greener - political structure and economic development in the United States. Community Development Journal 1989, 24(2):95-100.
32. Miller T., Kraushaar R. The emergence of participatory policies for community development: Anglo-American experiences and their influence on Sweden. Acta Sociologica 1979, 22(2).
33. Mossberger K., Wolman H. Policy transfer as a form of prospective policy evaluation: challenges and recommendations. Public Administration Review 2003, 63(2):428-440.
34. Mossberger K. The Politics of Ideas and the Spread of Enterprise Zones 2000, Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC.
35. Newmark A. An integrated approach to policy transfer and diffusion. The Review of Policy Research 2002, 19(2):151-177.
36. Overman, H., 2011. Budget 2011: Enterprise zones: right diagnosis, wrong treatment? In: British Politics and Policy at LSE, 23 March, 2011 (Blog Entry).
37. Papke L. What do we know about enterprise zones?. Tax Policy and the Economy 1993, 7:37-72.
38. Parkinson M., et al. The Credit Crunch and Regeneration: Impact and Implications 2009, Communities & Local Government, London.
39. Peck J., Theodore N. Exporting workfare/importing welfare-to-work: exploring the politics of Third Way policy transfer. Political Geography 2001, 20(4):427-460.
40. Peck J., Tickell A. Neoliberalizing space. Antipode 2002, 34(3):380-404.
41. Raco M. A step change or a step back? The Thames Gateway and the re-birth of the urban development corporations. Local Economy 2005, 2:141-153.
42. Rose R. What is lesson drawing?. Public Policy 1991, 11(1):3-33.
43. Strauss A., Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory 2008, Sage, Los Angeles.
44. The Core Cities Group and BPF A Rough Guide to Tax Increment Financing 2010, The Core Cities Group and BPF.
45. The Core Cities Group and PwC Unlocking City Growth Interim Findings on New Funding Mechanisms 2008, The Core Cities Group and PwC, London.
46. Ward K., Jonas A. A world of regionalisms? Towards a US-UK urban and regional policy framework comparison. Journal of Urban Affairs 2002, 24(4):377-401.
47. Wolman H. Understanding cross-national policy transfers: the case of Britain and the US. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration 1992, 5(1):27-45.
48. Wolman H. Policy Transfer: What We Know About What Transfers, How it Happens, and How to Do It 2009, Presentation to Gastein European Forum for Health Policy: George Washington Institute for Public Policy.