Combining Simulation and Emulation for Calibrating Sequentially Reactive Transport Systems

Transport in Porous Media

Volumn 92, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 509-526

  Sun, Y ^a   Tong, C ^a   Duan, Q ^b   Buscheck, T A ^a   Blink, J A ^a  

^a LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b BEIJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Emulation; First order; Reaction kinetics; Simulation; Transport

Indexed keywords

EMULATION; FIELD SCALE; FIRST ORDER REACTIONS; FIRST-ORDER; GLOBAL SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; HIGH-DIMENSIONAL; LABORATORY SCALE; NUMBER OF SAMPLES; OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS; OPTIMIZATION APPROACH; PARAMETRIC SPACES; REACTIVE TRANSPORT; REACTIVE TRANSPORT MODELS; RESPONSE SURFACE; SIMULATION; TRANSPORT; UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATIONS;

ASSOCIATION REACTIONS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; REACTION KINETICS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

REACTION RATES;

BENCHMARKING; CALIBRATION; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; LABORATORY METHOD; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; PARAMETERIZATION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REACTION KINETICS; REACTIVE TRANSPORT; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 84857787818     PISSN: 01693913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11242-011-9917-4     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Aziz, C. E., Newell, C. J., Gonzales, G. R., Haas, P. E., Clement, T. P., Sun, Y.: BIOCHLOR-Natural attenuation decision support system. Beta version 1. 0, User Manual, Subsurface Protection and Remediation Division, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Ada, OK (1999).
2. Bauer S., Beyer, C., Kolditz, O.: Assessing measurement uncertainty of first-order degradation rates in heterogeneous aquifers. Water Resour. Res. 42, W01420. (2006). doi: 10. 1029/2004WR003878.
3. Bear J.: Groundwater Hydraulics. McGraw-Hill, New York (1979).
4. Bear J., Sun Y.: Optimization of pump-treat-inject (PTI) design for the remediation of a contaminated aquifers multi-stage design with chance-constraints. J. Contam. Hydrol. 29(3), 223-242 (1998).
5. Bear J., Cheng A. H. D.: Modeling Groundwater Flow and Contaminant Transport. Springer, Dordrecht (2010).
6. Buscheck T. E., Alcantar C. M.: Regression techniques and analytical solution to demonstrate intrinsic bioremediation. In: Hinchee, R. E. et al. (eds.) Intrinsic Bioremediation, pp. 109-116. Battelle Press, Columbus (1995).
7. Buscheck T. A., Glascoe L., Lee K. H., Gansemer J., Sun Y., Mansoor K.: Validation of the multiscale thermohydrological model used for analysis of a repository at Yucca Mountain. J. Contam. Hydrol. 62-63, 421-440 (2003).
8. Chappelle F. H., Bradley P. M., Lovley D. R., Vroblesky D. A.: Measuring rates of biodegradation in a contaminated aquifer using field and laboratory methods. Ground Water 34(4), 691-698 (1996).
9. Clement T. P., Sun Y., Hooker B. S., Petersen J. N.: Modeling multi-species reactive transport in groundwater aquifers. Groundwater Monit. Remediat. 18(2), 79-92 (1998).
10. Clement T. P., Johnson C. D., Sun Y., Klecka G. M., Bartlett C.: Natural attenuation chlorinated ethene compounds: model development and field-scale application at the Dover Site. J. Contam. Hydrol. 42(2-4), 113-140 (2000).
11. Dai Z., Samper J., Ritzi R.: Identifying geochemical processes by inverse modeling of multicomponent reactive transport in Aquia aquifer. Geosphere 2(4), 210-219 (2006). doi: 10. 1130/GES00021. 1.
12. Doherty J., Hunt R. J.: Two statistics for evaluating parameter identifiability and error reduction. J. Hydrol. 366(1-4), 119-127 (2009).
13. Doherty J. E.: Manual for PEST: Model Independent Parameter Estimation. Watermark Numerical Computing, Brisbane (2009).
14. Doherty, J., Christensen, S.: Use of paired simple and complex models to reduce predictive bias and quantify uncertainty. Water Resour. Res. (2011). doi: 10. 1029/2011WR010763.
15. Domenico P. A.: An analytical model for multidimensional transport of a decaying contaminant species. J. Hydrol. 91(1-2), 49-58 (1987).
16. Eldred, M. S., Giunta, A. A., van Bloemen Waanders, B. G., Wojtkiewicz Jr., S. F., Hart, W. E., Alleva, M. P.: DAKOTA, A multilevel parallel object-oriented framework for design optimization, parameter estimation, uncertainty quantification, and sensitivity analysis, Version 3. 0 developers manual. Sandia Laboratories, SAND2001-3514 (2002).
17. Engineous Software, Inc.: iSIGHT designer's guide, Version 4. 05. Engineous Software, Inc., Morrisville (1998).
18. Hao, Y., Sun, Y., Nitao, J. J.: Overview of NUFT-a versatile numerical model for simulating flow and reactive transport in porous media, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, LLNL-BOOK-42714-DRAFT (2010).
19. Hosseini A. H., Deutsch C. V., Mendoza C. A., Biggar K. W.: Inverse modeling for characterization of uncertainty in transport parameters under uncertainty of source geometry in heterogeneous aquifers. J. Hydrol. 405(3-4), 402-416 (2011).
20. Hsieh, H.: Application of the PSUADE tool for sensitivity analysis of an engineering simulation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, UCRL-TR-237205 (2007).
21. Iman R. L., Helton J. C., Campbell J. E: An approach to sensitivity analysis of computer models, Part 1. Introduction, input variable selection and preliminary variable assessment. J. Qual. Technol. 13(3), 174-183 (1981).
22. James S. C., Doherty J. E., Eddebbarh A.: Practical postcalibration uncertainty analysis: Yucca Mountain, Nevada. Ground Water 47(6), 851-869 (2009).
23. Major D. W., McMaster M. L., Cox E. E., Edward E. A., Dworatzek S. M., Hendrickson E. R., Satrr M. G., Payne J. A., Buonamici L. W.: Field demonstration of successful bioaugmentation to achieve dechlorination of tetrachloroethene to ethene. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36, 5106-5116 (2002).
24. MathWorks: MATLAB high-performance numeric computation and visualization software. Mathworks, Natick. www. mathwroks. com (2000).
25. McKay M. D., Beckman R. J., Conover W. J.: A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 21(2), 239-245 (1979). doi: 10. 2307/1268522.
26. McNab W. W. Jr, Dooher B. P.: A critique of a steady-state analytical method for estimating contaminant degradation rates. Ground Water 36(6), 983-987 (1998).
27. Nitao, J. J.: User's manual for the USNT module of the NUFT code, version 2 (NP-phase, NC-component, thermal), Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, UCRL-MA-130653 (1998).
28. O'Hagan A.: Bayesian analysis of computer code outputs: a tutorial. Reliab. Eng. Sys. Safety 91(10), 1290-1300 (2006).
29. Petersen J. N., Sun Y.: An analytical solution evaluating steady-state plumes of sequentially reactive contaminants. Transp. Porous Med. 41(3), 287-303 (2000).
30. Poeter, E. P., Hill, M. C., Banta, E. R., Mehl, S., Christensen, S.: UCODE_2005 and six other computer codes for universal sensitivity analysis, calibration, and uncertainty evaluation, techniques and methods 6-a11. US Geol. Surv. (2005).
31. Powell, M. J. D:. The NEWUOA software for unconstrained minimization without derivatives. In: Di Pillo, G., Roma, M. Large-Scale Nonlinear Optimization, pp. 255-297. Springer, New York (2006).
32. Powell, M. J. D.: The BOBYQA algorithm for bound constrained optimization without derivatives. Tech. Rep. NA2009/06, Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge (2009).
33. Saltelli A., Ratto M., Andres T., Campolongo F., Cariboni J., Gatelli D., Saisana M., Tarantola S.: Global Sensitivity Analysis. The Primer. Wiley, Chichester (2008).
34. Shukhman B.: Generation of quasi-random (LPτ) vectors for parallel computation. Comp. Phys. Commun. 78(3), 279-286 (1994).
35. Sobol' I.: Sensitivity estimates for nonlinear mathematical models, in Russian. Matematicheskoe Modelirovanie 2, 112-118 (1990).
36. Sobol', I.: Sensitivity analysis for nonlinear mathematical models, Mathematical Modeling & Computational Experiment, vol. 1, pp. 407-414, (English translation from Russian original paper Sobol', 1990) (1993).
37. Southwest Research Institute: NESSUS User's Manual, Version 8. Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio (2004).
38. Sun Y., Petersen J. N., Clement T. P., Skeen R. S.: Development of analytical solutions for multi-species transport with serial and parallel reactions. Water Resour. Res. 35(1), 185-190 (1999).
39. Sun, Y., Demir, Z., Delorenzo, T., Nitao, J. J.: Application of the NUFT code for subsurface remediation by bioventing, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, UCRL-ID-137967 (2000).
40. Sun Y., Petersen J. N., Bear J.: Successive identification of biodegradation rates for multiple sequentially reactive contaminants in groundwater. J. Contam. Hydrol. 51(1-2), 83-95 (2001).
41. Sun Y., Buscheck T. A., Lee K. H., Hao Y., James S. C.: Modeling thermal-hydrologic processes for a heated fractured rock system: impact of a capillary-pressure maximum. Transp. Porous Med. 83(3), 501-523 (2010).
42. Tong, C.: PSUADE User's Manual, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, LLNL-SM-407882 (2005).
43. van Genuchten M. Th.: Convective-dispersive transport of solutes involed in sequential first-order decay reactions. Comput. Geosci. 11(2), 129-147 (1985).
44. van Genuchten, M. Th., Alves, W. J.: Analytical solutions of the one dimensional convective dispersive solute transport equation. Techn. Bull. 1661, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture (1982).
45. Wexler, E. J.: Analytical solutions for one-, two-, and three-dimensional solute transport in ground-water systems with uniform flow, U. S. Geological Survey, Book 3, Ch. B7, p. 199 (1992).
46. Wiedemeier T. H., Swanson M. A., Wilson J. T., Kampbel D. H., Miller R. N., Hansen J.: Approximation of biodegradation rate constants for monoaromatic hydrocarbon (BTEX) in ground water. Groundwater Monit. Remediat. 16(3), 186-194 (1996).
47. Wiedemeier T. H., Rifai H. S., Wilson T. J., Newell C.: Natura Attenuation of Fuels and Chlorinated Solvents in the Subsurface. Wiley, Hoboken (1999).
48. Wilson J. L., Miller P. J.: Two-dimensional plume in uniform groundwater flow. J. Hydraul. Div. 104, 503-514 (1978).