Reactive redundancy and listener comprehension in direction-giving

ACL-08: HLT - Proceedings of the 9th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 37-45

  Baker, Rachel E ^a   Gill, Alastair J ^a   Cassell, Justine ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NON-VERBAL SIGNALS; TASK-ORIENTED;

REDUNDANCY;

EID: 84857758342     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1622064.1622071     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. M. Argyle and M. Cook. 1976. Gaze and Mutual Gaze. Cambridge University Press, New York.
2. E. Bard, A. Anderson, C. Sotillo, M. Aylett, G. Doherty-Sneddon and A. Newlands. 2000. Controlling the intelligibility of referring expressions in dialogue. J. Memory and Language, 42(1):1-22.
3. N. Bos, J. Olson, D. Gergle, G. Olson, and Z. Wright. 2002. Effects of four computer-mediated communication channels on trust development. In Proceedings of SIGCHI 2002, pages 135-140, Minneapolis, MN.
4. H. P. Branigan, J. F. McLean, and H. Reeve. 2003. Something old, something new: Addressee knowledge and the given-new contract. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pages 180-185, Boston, MA.
5. B. Brighton, M. Fujiki, and E. Sonnenberg. 1988. Responses to requests for clarification by linguistically normal and language-impaired children in conversation. J. Speech and Hearing Disorders, 53:383-391. (Pubitemid 19014837)
6. P. Brown and S. C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
7. J. Cassell, A. J. Gill, and P. Tepper. 2007. Coordination in conversation and rapport. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Embodied Language Processing at ACL, pages 41-50, Prague.
8. H. H. Clark and E. F. Schaeffer. 1989. Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science, 13:259-294.
9. M. G. Core and J. F. Allen. 1997. Coding dialogs with the DAMSL annotation scheme. In Proceedings of AAAI Fall Symposium on Communicative Action in Humans and Machines, pages 28-35, Boston, MA.
10. H. Dalianis. 1999. Aggregation in natural language generation. J. Computational Intelligence, 15(4):384-414.
11. S. R. Fussell and R. M. Krauss. 1989 a. The effects of intended audience on message production and comprehension: Reference in a common ground framework. European J. Social Psychology, 25:203-219.
12. S. R. Fussell and R. M. Kraus. 1989 b. Understanding friends and strangers: The effects of audience design on message comprehension. European J. Social Psychology, 19:445-454.
13. C. Goodwin. 1981. Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. Academic Press, New York.
14. H. P. Grice. 1975. Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J. Morgan, editors, Syntax and Semantics III - Speech Acts. Academic Press, New York, pages 41-58.
15. G. Hirst, S. McRoy, P. Heeman, P. Edmonds, and D. Horton. 1994. Repairing conversational misunderstandings and non-understandings. Speech Communication, 15: 213-230.
16. L. Horn. 1993. Economy and redundancy in a dualistic model of natural language. SKY 1993: Yearbook of the Linguistic Association of Finland: 33-72.
17. A. Horning. 1991. Readable writing: The role of cohesion and redundancy. J. Advanced Composition, 11:135-145.
18. G. Hornstein. 1985. Intimacy in conversational style as a function of the degree of closeness between members of a dyad. J. Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3):671-681.
19. W. Horton and B. Keysar. 1996. When do speakers take into account common ground? Cognition, 59:91-117. (Pubitemid 126375290)
20. S. Kopp, P. Tepper, K. Ferriman, K. Striegnitz and J. Cassell. 2008. Trading spaces: How humans and humanoids use speech and gesture to give directions. In T. Nishida, editor, Conversational Informatics. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pages 133-160.
21. B. Lindlom. 1990. Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H and H theory. In W. Hardcastle & A. Marchal, editors, Speech Production and Speech Modeling. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pages 403-439.
22. D. Morrow, A. Lee, and M. Rodvold. 1993. Analysis of problems in routine controller-pilot communication. International J. Aviation Psychology. 3(4): 285-302.
23. Y. Nakano, G. Reinstein, T. Stocky, and J. Cassell. 2003. Towards a model of face-to-face grounding. In Proceedings of ACL 2003, pages 553-561, Sapporo, Japan.
24. S. Planalp and A. Benson. 1992. Friends' and acquaintances' conversations I: Perceived differences. J. Social and Personal Relationships, 9:483-506.
25. B. Schlenker. 1984. Identities, identifications, and relationships. In V. Derlega, editor, Communication, Intimacy and Close Relationships. Academic Press, New York, pages 71-104.
26. R. Stalnaker. 1978. Assertion. In P. Cole, editor, Syntax and Semantics, Volume 9: Pragmatics. Academic Press, New York, pages 315-332.
27. G. Svendsen and B. Evjemo. 2003. Implicit referring as an indication of familiarity in face-to-face and phone conversations. In Proceedings of INTERACT '03: pages 920-923, Zurich.
28. M. Theune, D. Hofs and M. van Kessel. 2007. The Virtual guide: A direction giving embodied conversational agent. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2007, pages 2197-2200, Antwerp, Belgium.
29. L. Tickle-Degnen and R. Rosenthal. 1990. The nature of rapport and its nonverbal correlates. Psychological Inquiry, 1(4):285-293.
30. M. A. Walker. 1992. Redundancy in collaborative dialogue. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 345-351, Nantes, France.
31. M. A. Walker. 1996. The effect of resource limits and task complexity on collaborative planning in dialogue. Artificial Intelligence Journal, 85:181-243. (Pubitemid 126363730)