Centrifuge modelling of jacked piles

Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Physical Modelling in Geotechnics - Physical Modelling in Geotechnics - 6th ICPMG '06

Volumn 2, Issue , 2006, Pages 821-826

  Deeks, A D ^a   White, D J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CENTRIFUGATION; CENTRIFUGES; CONCURRENCY CONTROL; CONTROL SYSTEMS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; TESTING; DISPLACEMENT CONTROL; SOFTWARE TESTING;

AXIAL RESPONSES; CONSTANT RATES; DEGREE OF CONTROLS; DISPLACEMENT PILES; DRY SANDS; FIELD TESTS; FLEXIBLE CONTROL SYSTEMS; INSTALLATION METHODS; JACKED PILES; PARAMETRIC STUDIES; PENETRATION RESISTANCES; STATIC LOADS; TECHNIQUES USES; TEST CONDITIONS; TEST PILES; TWO TYPES;

PILES;

AXIAL RESPONSE; CENTRIFUGE MODELLING; CONSTANT RATE; DEGREE OF CONTROL; DISPLACEMENT PILE; DRY SAND; FIELD SCALE; FIELD TEST; FLEXIBLE CONTROL SYSTEMS; INSTALLATION METHODS; JACKED PILE; LOAD TEST; PARAMETRIC STUDY; PENETRATION RESISTANCES; STATIC LOADS; TEST CONDITION;

EID: 84857748928     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Baldi, G., Belottini, R. & Ghionna, V.N. 1989. Modulus of sands from CPT's and DMT's. Proc. 12th ICSMGE. Rio de Janeiro. 1: 165-170.
2. Baldi, G., Bellotti, R., Ghionna, V.N., Jamiolkowski, M. & Pasqualini, E. 1986. Interpretation of CPTs and CPTUs; 2nd part: drained penetration of sands. Procs. of the 4th Int. Geotechnical Seminar, Singapore. 1: 143-156.
3. BRE 1994. Factual report on the in situ testing at Dunkerque, France. Report number: G/GP/P411.
4. Brucy, F., Nauroy, J.F., Le Tirant, P. & Meunier, J. 1991. Comparison of static and dynamic tests of piles in sand. Int. Conference on Deep Foundations, Paris. 369-378.
5. BSI 1988. Testing concrete. Methods for testing cement in a reference concrete. British Standard BS 1881-131: 8.
6. Dasylab 2004. Dasylab 8 user guide. Dasylab.
7. De Nicola, A. & Randolph, M.F. 1993. Tensile and compressive shaft capacity of piles in sand. J. Geot. Eng. Div. ASCE. 119(12): 1952-1973.
8. De Nicola A. & Randolph M.F. 1999. Centrifuge modelling of pipe piles in sand under axial loads. Géotechnique 49(3): 295-318.
9. De Beer, E. 1988. Different behaviour of bored and driven piles. BAP I: 47-82. Rotterdam: Balkema.
10. Deeks, A.D., White, D.J. & Bolton, M.D. 2005. A comparison of jacked, driven and bored piles in sand. 16th Int. Conf. on Soil Mech. and Geot. Eng., Osaka: 2103-2106.
11. Dietz, M.S. 2000. Developing an holistic understanding of interface friction using sand within the direct shear apparatus. Ph.D. University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
12. Ghionna, V.N., Jamiolkowski, M., Lancellotta, R. & Pedroni, S. 1993. Base capacity of bored piles in sands from in situ tests. BAP II, Balkema. Rotterdam: 67-75.
13. Gui, M.W., Bolton, M.D., Garnier, J., Corte, J.F., Bagge, G., Laue, J. & Renzi, R. 1998. Guidelines for cone penetration tests in sand. Centrifuge '98: 155-160. Balkema.
14. Houlsby, G.T. & Hitchman, R. 1988. Calibration chamber tests of a cone penetrometer in sand. Geotechnique 38(1): 39-44.
15. Lee, J.H., Salgado, R. & Paik, K. 2003. Estimation of load capacity of pipe piles in sand based on cone penetration test results. J. Geot. & Geoenv. Eng. ASCE, 129(5): 391-403.
16. Madabhushi, S.P.G., Houghton, N.E. & Haigh, S.K. 2006. A new automatic sand pourer for model preparation at the University of Cambridge. ICPMG'06, Hong Kong.
17. Phoon, K.K. & Kulhawy, F.H. 1999. Characterization of geotechnical variability. Can. Geot. J. 36(4): 612-624.
18. Robertson, P.K. & Campanella, R.G. 1983. Interpretation of cone penetrometer tests: Part I: Sand. Can. Geot. J. 20(4): 718-733.
19. Rockhill, D.J., Bolton, M.D. & White, D.J. 2003. Groundborne vibrations due to press-in piling operations. BGA Int. Conf. Fndns: 743-756.
20. Schofield, A.N. 1980. Cambridge Geotechnical Centrifuge Operations. Géotechnique 30(3): 227-268.
21. Silva, M.F. 2005. Numerical and physical models of rate effects in soil penetration. Ph.D. Engineering Department. Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.
22. White, D.J. 2003. PSD measurement using the single particle optical sizing method. Géotechnique 53(3): 137-326.
23. Wood, D.M. 2004. Geotechnical Modelling. London and New York: Spon Press.
24. Yetginer, A.G., White, D.J. & Bolton, M.D. 2003. Press-in piling: Field testing of cell foundations. BGA Int. Conf. Fndns: 963-974.
25. Zhao, Y., Gafar, K., Thusyanthan, N.I., Knappett, J.A., Mohamed, H., Deeks, A.D. & Madabhushi, S.P.G. 2006. Calibration and use of a new automatic sand pourer. ICPMG'06, Hong Kong.