Effects of demineralizaton-inhibition procedures on the bond strength of brackets bonded to demineralized enamel surface

Korean Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 17-22

  Ekizer, Abdullah ^a   Zorba, Yahya Orcun ^a   Uysal, Tancan ^b   Ayrikcil, Servet ^a  

^a ERCIYES UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b IZMIR KATIP CELEBI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Bonding; Bracket; Decalcification; Oral hygiene

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857703302     PISSN: 12255610     EISSN: 2005372X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4041/kjod.2012.42.1.17     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Zabokova-Bilbilova E, Stafilov T, Sotirovska-Ivkovska A, Sokolovska F. Prevention of enamel demineralization during orthodontic treatment: An in vitro study using GC Tooth Mousse. Balk J Stom 2008;12:133-7.
2. Mizrahi E. Enamel demineralization following orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1982;82:62-7.
3. Ogaard B. Prevalence of white spot lesions in 19-yearolds: a study on untreated and orthodontically treat ed persons 5 years aft er treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;96:423-7.
4. Gorelick L, Geiger AM, Gwinnett AJ. Incidence of white spot formation after bonding and banding. Am J Orthod 1982;81:93-8.
5. O'Reilly MM, Featherstone JD. Demineralization and remineralization around orthodontic appliances: an in vivo study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;92:33-40.
6. Boersma JG, van der Veen MH, Lagerweij MD, Bokhout B, Prahl-Andersen B. Caries prevalence measured with QLF aft er treatment with fixed ortho dontic appliances: influencing factors. Caries Res 2005;39:41-7.
7. Donly KJ, Sasa IS. Potential remineralization of postorthodontic demineralized enamel and the use of enamel microabrasion and bleaching for esthetics. Semi n Orthod 2008;14:220-5.
8. ten Cate JM. Current concepts on the theories of the mechanism of action of fluoride. Acta Odontol Scand 1999;57:325-9.
9. Reynolds EC, Cai F, Cochrane NJ, Shen P, Walker GD, Morgan MV, et al. Fluoride and casein phosph opeptide- amorphous calcium phosphate. J Dent Res 2008; 87:344-8.
10. Reynolds EC, Cain CJ, Webber FL, Black CL, Riley PF, Johnson IH, et al. Anticariogenicity of calcium phosphate complexes of tryptic casein pho spho peptides in the rat. J Dent Res 1995;74:1272-9.
11. Iijima Y, Cai F, Shen P, Walker G, Reynolds C, Reynolds EC. Acid resistance of enamel subsurface lesions remineralized by a sugar-free chewing gum containing casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate. Caries Res 2004;38:551-6.
12. Reynolds EC, Cai F, Shen P, Walker GD. Retention in plaque and remineralization of enamel lesions by various forms of calcium in a mouthrinse or sugarfree chewing gum. J Dent Res 2003;82:206-11.
13. Paris S, Meyer-Lueckel H, Kielbassa AM. Resin infiltration of natural caries lesions. J Dent Res 2007; 86:662-6.
14. Kidd EAM, van Amerongen JP. The role of operative treatment in caries control. In: Fejerskov O, Kidd E editors. Dental caries: The dis ease and its clinical management. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Munksgaard; 2003. p. 245-50.
15. Paris S, Meyer-Lueckel H, Mueller J, Hummel M, Kielbassa AM. Progression of sealed initial bovine enamel lesions under demineralizing conditions in vitro. Caries Res 2006;40:124-9.
16. Meyer-Lueckel H, Paris S, Mueller J, Cölfen H, Kielbassa AM. Influence of the application time on the penetration of different dental adhesives and a fissure sealant into artificial subsurface lesions in bovine enamel. Dent Mater 2006;22:22-8.
17. Hu W, Featherstone JD. Prevention of enamel demine ralization: an in-vitro study using light-cured filled sealant. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 128:592-600.
18. Reynolds EC. Remineralization of enamel subsurface lesions by casein phosphopeptide-stabilized calcium phosphate solutions. J Dent Res 1997;76:1587-95.
19. Oliver RG. The effect of different methods of bracket removal on the amount of residual adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;93:196-200.
20. Garcia-Godoy F, Hubbard GW, Storey AT. Effect of a fluoridated etching gel on enamel morphology and shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;100:163-70.
21. Damon PL, Bishara SE, Olsen ME, Jakobsen JR. Effects of fluoride application on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 1996;66:61-4.
22. Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Calvi D, Scribante A. Effect of fluoride application on shear bond strength of brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass-ionomer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;127:580-3.
23. Powers JM, Messersmith ML. Enamel etching and bond strength. In: Brantley WA, Eliades T editors. Orthodontic materials: scientific and clinical aspects. New York: Thieme; 2001. p. 107-22.
24. Dunn WJ. Shear bond strength of an amorphous calcium- phosphate-containing orthodontic resin ce ment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:243-7.
25. Foster JA, Berzins DW, Bradley TG. Bond strength of an amorphous calcium phosphate-containing orthodontic adhesive. Angle Orthod 2008;78:339-44.
26. Uysal T, Ulker M, Akdogan G, Ramoglu SI, Yilmaz E. Bond strength of amorphous calcium phosphatecontaining orthodontic composite used as a lingual retainer adhesive. Angle Orthod 2009;79:117-21.
27. Paris S, Meyer-Lueckel H. Inhibition of caries progression by resin infiltration in situ. Caries Res 2010; 44:47-54.