Future scenarios: A technical document supporting the forest service 2010 RPA assessment

USDA Forest Service - General Technical Report RMRS-GTR

Volumn , Issue 272, 2012, Pages 1-34

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

Bioenergy; Climate; Income; Land use; Population; Scenarios

Indexed keywords

BIOENERGY; CLIMATE CHANGE; ECONOMIC GROWTH; FOREST RESOURCE; FUTURE PROSPECT; LAND USE CHANGE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; RANGELAND; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY;

EID: 84857700054     PISSN: 02775786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Alcamo, J.; Ash, N.J.; Butler, C.D.; and others. 2003. Ecosystems and human well-being. Washington, DC: Island Press. 245 p.
2. Alig, Ralph J.; Butler, Brett J. 2004. Projecting large-scale area changes in land use and land cover for terrestrial carbon analyses. Environmental Management 33(4): 443-456.
3. Bachelet, D.; Lenihan, J.; Drapek, R.; Neilson, R.P. 2008. VEMAP vs. VINCERA: a DGVM sensitivity to differences in climate scenarios. Global and Planetary Change 64: 38-48.
4. Carpenter, S.R.; Pingali, P.L.; Bennett, E.M.; Zurek, M.B., eds. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: scenarios, volume 2. Findings of the scenarios working group of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press. 560 p.
5. Daly, C. 1994. A statistical-topographic model for mapping climatological precipitation over mountainous terrain. Journal of Applied Meteorology 33: 140-158.
6. Ebhalt, D.; Prather, M.; Dentener, F.; Derwent, and others. 2001. Atmospheric chemistry and greenhouse gases. In: Houghton, J.T.; Ding, Y.; Griggs, D.J.; Noguer, M.; van der Linden, P.J.; Dai, X.; Maskell, K.; Johnson, C.A., eds. Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom, and New York: Cambridge University Press 881 p.
7. Fowler, H.J.; Blenkinsop, S.; Tebaldi, C. 2007. Linking climate change modeling to impacts studies: recent advances in downscaling techniques for hydrological modeling. International Journal of Climatology 27: 1547-1578.
8. Hamlet, Alan F.; Lettenmaier, Dennis P. 1999. Effects of climate change on hydrology and water resources in the Columbia River Basin. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 35(6): 1597-1623.
9. Hayhoe, K.; Wake, C.P.; Huntington, T.G.; and others. 2007. Past and future changes in climate and hydrological indicators in the U.S. Northeast. Climate Dynamics 28: 381-407.
10. Ince, P.J.; Kramp, A.D.; Skog, K.E.; Spelter, H.N.; Wear, D.N. 2011. U.S. Forest Products Module for RPA forest assessment. Res. Pap. FPL-RP-662. Madison, Wisconsin: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. 61 p.
11. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC]. 2007. Climate change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth AssessmentReport of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R. K and Reisinger, A.(eds.)]. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC. 104 p. Available at: http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/publications_ ipcc_fourth_assessment_report_synthesis_report.htm.
12. Joyce, Linda A., ed. 1995. Productivity of America's forest and climate change. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-271. Fort Collins, Colorado: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 70 p.
13. Joyce, Linda A, Birdsey, Richard, tech. eds. 2000. The impact of climate change on America's forests: a technical document supporting the 2000 USDA Forest Service RPA Assessment. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-59. Fort Collins, Colorado: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 133 p.
14. Joyce, Linda A.; Fosberg, Michael A.; Comanor, Joan A. 1990. Climate change and America's forests. Gen. Tech. Rept. RM-187. Fort Collins, Colorado: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 12 p.
15. Joyce, Linda A.; Price, David T.; Coulson, David P.; McKenney, Daniel W.; Siltanen, R. Martin; Papadopol, Pia; Lawrence, Kevin. In review. Projecting climate change in the United States: a technical document supporting the Forest Service 2010 RPA Assessment. Gen. Tech. Rep. Fort Collins, Colorado: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
16. Le Treut, H.; Somerville, R.; Cubasch, U.; Ding, Y.; Mauritzen, C.; Mokssit, A.; Peterson, T.; Prather, M. 2007. Historical overview of climate change. In: Solomon, S.; Qin, D.; Manning, M.; Chen, Z.; Marquis, M.; Averyt, K.B.; Tignor M.; Miller, H.L., eds. Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Lubowski, R.N.; Plantinga, A.; Stavins, R. 2006. Land-use change and carbon sinks: econometric estimation of the carbon sequestration supply function. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 51: 135-152.
18. McKenney, D.; Price, D.; Papadapol, P.; Siltanen, M; Lawrence, K. 2006. High-resolution climate change scenarios for North America. Frontline Technical Note 107. Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario: Canadian Forestry Service, Great Lakes Forestry Centre.
19. Meehl, G.A.; Covey, C.; Delworth, T.; Latif, M.; McAvaney, B.; Mitchell, J.F.B.; Stouffer, R.J.; Taylor, K.E. 2007a. The WCRP CMIP3 multimodel data set. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society September 2007: 1383-1394.
20. Meehl, G.A.; Stocker, T.F.; Collins, W.D.; and others. 2007b. Global climate projections. In: Solomon, S.; Qin, D.; Manning, M.; Chen, Z.; Marquis, M.; Averyt, K.B.; Tignor M.; Miller, H.L., eds. Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York: Cambridge University Press.
21. Miller, Norman L.; Bashford, Kathy E.; Strem, Eric. 2003. Potential impacts of climate change on California hydrology. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 39(4):771-784.
22. Nakicenovic, N.; Alcamo, J.; Davis, G.; and others. 2000. Emissions scenarios: a special report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York: Cambridge University Press. 599 p. Available at: http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc/emission/index.htm.
23. National Intelligence Council. 2004. Mapping the global future: report on of the National Intelligence Council's 2020 project. Available at: http://www.dni.gov/nic/NIC_globaltrend2020.html.
24. Prentice, I.C.; Farquhar, G.D.; Fasham, M.J.R.; and others. 2001. The carbon cycle and atmospheric carbon dioxide. Chapter 3 in: Houghton, J.T.; Ding, Y.; Griggs, D.J.; Noguer, M.; van der Linden, P.J.; Dai, X.; Maskell, K.; Johnson, C.A., eds. Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York: Cambridge University Press. 881 p.
25. Price, D.T.; McKenney, D.W.; Papadopol, P.; Logan, T.; Hutchinson, M.F. 2004. High resolution future scenario climate data for North America. Pages 7.7-7.7.13 In: Proceedings of the 26th Conference on Agricultural and Forest Meteorology: Vancouver, British Columbia:, 23-26 August 2004. Boston, Massachusetts: American Meteorology Society. Available at: http://ams.confex. com/ams/AFAPURBBIO/techprogram/paper_78202.htm. [Accessed 28 July 2010.]
26. Price, D.T.; McKenney, D.W.; Joyce, L.A.; Siltanen, R.M.; Papadopol, P.; Lawrence, K. 2011. High-resolution interpolation of climate scenarios for Canada derived from General Circulation Model simulations. Inf. Rep. NOR-X-421. Edmonton, Alberta: Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Center. 126 p.
27. Randall, D.A.; Wood, R.A.; Bony, S.; and others. 2007. Climate models and their evaluation. In: Solomon, S.; Qin, D.; Manning, M.; Chen, Z.; Marquis, M.; Averyt, K.B.; Tignor M.; Miller, H.L., eds. Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Ray, A.J.; Barsugli, J.J.; Wolter, K.; Eischeid, J.K. 2010. Rapidresponse climate assessment to support the FWS status review of the American pika. Boulder, Colorado: NOAA Earth Systems Research Laboratory. Available at: http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/ news/2010/pdf/pika_report_final.pdf.
29. Reichler, Thomas; Junsu, Kim. 2008. How well do coupled models simulate today's climate? Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 89:303-311.
30. United Nations Environment Program [UNEP]. 2002. Global Environment Outlook 3. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd. 460 p.
31. United Nations Environment Program [UNEP]. 2007. Global Environment Outlook 4. Valletta, Malta: Progress Press Ltd. 572 p.
32. U.S. Census Bureau. 2004. U.S. interim projections by age, sex, race and Hispanic origin. Internet release: March 18, 2004. Available online at: http://www.census.gov/population/www/projections/ usinterimproj/natprojtab01a.pdf
33. U.S. Department of Commerce. 2008a. National income product accounts table 1.15. Gross domestic product. Version: January 30, 2008. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
34. U.S. Department of Commerce. 2008b. National income product accounts table 2.1. Personal income and its disposition. Version: January 30, 2008. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis.
35. U.S. Forest Service. 1977. The nation's renewable resources-an assessment, 1975. Forest Resource Report No. 21. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington Office. 243 p.
36. U.S. Forest Service. 1981. An assessment of the forest and range land situation in the United States. Forest Resource Report No. 22. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington Office. 352 p.
37. U.S. Forest Service. 1989. RPA assessment of the forest and rangeland situation in the United States, 1989. Resource Report No. 26. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington Office. 72 p.
38. U.S. Forest Service. 2001. 2000 RPA assessment of forest and range lands. FS-687. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington Office. 78 p.
39. Wear, David N. 2011. Forecasts of county-level land uses under three future scenarios: a technical document supporting the Forest Service 2010 RPA Assessment. Gen. Tech Rep-141. Asheville, North Carolina: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 41 p.
40. Wilby, R.L.; Charles, S.P.; Zorita, E.; Timbal, B.; Whetton, P.; Mearns, L.O. 2004. Guidelines for use of climate scenarios developed from statistical downscaling methods. Available at: http://www.ipcc-data.org/guidelines/dgm_no2_v1_09_2004.pdf.
41. Woods & Poole Economics Inc. 2006. The 2006 complete economic and demographic data source (CEDDS). Washington, DC. Available at: http://www.woodsandpoole.com.
42. Zarnoch, Stanley J.; Cordell, H. Ken; Betz, Carter J; Langner, Linda. 2010. Projecting county-level populations under three future scenarios: a technical document supporting the Forest Service 2010 RPA Assessment. E-Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-128. Asheville, North Carolina: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 8 p.