Antagonistic responses to natural and sexual selection and the sex-specific evolution of cuticular hydrocarbons indrosophila simulans

Evolution

Volumn 66, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 665-677

  Sharma, Manmohan D ^a   Hunt, John ^a   Hosken, David J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cuticular hydrocarbons; Drosophila simulans; Experimental evolution; Natural selection; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

HYDROCARBON;

ANTAGONISM; CUTICLE; FLY; SEXUAL SELECTION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; DROSOPHILA; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; MALE; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; DROSOPHILA; FEMALE; HYDROCARBONS; MALE; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEX CHARACTERISTICS;

DROSOPHILA SIMULANS;

EID: 84857688446     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01468.x     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ
2. Antony, C., and J. M. Jallon 1982. The chemical basis for sex recognition inDrosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol. 28:873-880.
3. Arnold, S. J. 1983. Sexual selection: the interface of theory and empiricism. Pp. 67-107 in P. Bateson, ed. Mate choice. Cambridge Univ. Press, UK
4. Bentsen, C. L., J. Hunt, M. D. Jennions, and R. Brooks 2006. Complex multivariate sexual selection on male acoustic signalling in a wild population ofTeleogryllus commodus. Am. Nat. 167:E102-E116.
5. Blows, M. W. 2002. Interaction between natural and sexual selection during the evolution of mate recognition. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269:1113-1118.
6. Bonduriansky, R., and S. F. Chenoweth 2009. Intralocus sexual conflict. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24:280-288.
7. Chenoweth, S. F., and M. W. Blows 2003. Signal trait sexual dimorphism and mutual sexual selection inDrosophila serrata. Evolution 57:2326-2334.
8. Chenoweth, S. F., and M. W. Blows 2005. Contrasting mutual sexual selection on homologous signal traits inDrosophila serrata. Am. Nat. 165:281-289.
9. Chenoweth, S. F., and M. W. Blows 2008. QST meets the G matrix: the dimensionality of adaptive divergence in multiple correlated quantitative traits. Evolution 62:1437-1449.
10. Chenoweth, S. F., H. D. Rundle, and M. W. Blows 2008. Genetic constraints and the evolution of display trait sexual dimorphism by natural and sexual selection. Am. Nat. 171:22-34.
11. Chenoweth, S. F., H. D. Rundle, and M. W. Blows 2010. Experimental evidence for the evolution of indirect genetic effects: changes in the interaction effect coefficient, Psi (Ψ), due to sexual selection. Evolution 64:1849-1856.
12. Cobb, M., and J. F. Ferveur 1995. Evolution and genetic control of mate recognition and stimulation inDrosophila. Behav. Proc. 35:35-54.
13. Cox, R. M., and R. Calsbeek 2009. Sexually antagonistic selection, sexual dimorphism, and the resolution of intralocus sexual conflict. Am. Nat. 173:176-187.
14. Coyne, J. A., and S. Elwyn 2006. Does the desaturase-2 locus inDrosophila melanogastercause adaptation and sexual isolation Evolution 60:279-291.
15. Dall, S. R. X., J. M. McNamara, N. Wedell, and D. J. Hosken 2006. Debating sexual selection and mating strategies. Science 31:689.
16. Endler, J. A. 1980. Natural selection on color patterns inPoecilia reticulata. Evolution 34:76-91.
17. Ferveur, J. F., M. Cobb, H. Boukella, and J. M. Jallon 1996. World-wide variation inDrosophila melanogastersex pheromone: behavioural effects, genetic bases and potential evolutionary consequences. Genetica 97:73-80.
18. Ferveur, J. F. 2005. Cuticular hydrocarbons: their evolution and roles inDrosophilapheromonal communication. Behav. Genet. 35:279-295.
19. Ferveur, J. F., and M. Cobb 2010. Behavioral and evolutionary roles of cuticular hydrocarbons in Diptera. Pp. 325-343 in G. J. Blomquist and A.-G. Bagnéres, eds. Insect hydrocarbons: biology, biochemistry, and chemical ecology. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
20. Ferveur, J. F., and G. Sureau 1996. Simultaneous influence on male courtship of stimulatory and inhibitory pheromones produced by live sex-mosaicDrosophila melanogaster. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263:967-973.
21. Foley, B. R., and M. Telonis-Scott 2011. Quantitative genetic analyses suggests causal association between cuticular hydrocarbon composition and dessiccation survival inDrosophila melanogaster. Heredity 106:68-77.
22. Frentiu, F. D., and S. F. Chenoweth 2009. Clines in cuticular hydrocarbons in twoDrosophilaspecies with independent population histories. Evolution 64:1784-1794.
23. Gibbs, A. G., A. K. Chippindale, and M. R. Rose 1997. Physiological mechanisms of evolved desiccation resistance inDrosophila melanogaster. J. Exp. Biol. 200:1821-1832.
24. Gibbs, A. G., and S. Rajpurohit 2010. Cuticular lipids and water balance. Pp. 100-120 in G. J. Blomquist and A.-G. Bagnéres, eds. Insect hydrocarbons: biology, biochemistry, and chemical ecology. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
25. Grafen, A. 1990. Biological signals as handicaps. J. Theor. Biol. 144:517-546.
26. Grillet, M., L. Dartevelle, and J. F. Ferveur 2006. ADrosophilamale pheromone affects female sexual receptivity. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 273:315-323.
27. Gwynne, D. 2001. Katydids and bush-crickets: reproductive behavior and evolution of the Tettigoniidae. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca
28. Hadley, N. F. 1981. Cuticular lipids of terrestrial plants and arthropods: a comparison of their structure, composition and waterproofing functions. Biol. Rev. 56:23-47.
29. Harano, T., K. Okada, S. Nakayama, T. Miyatake, and D. J. Hosken 2010. Intralocus conflict unresolved by sex-limited trait expression. Curr. Biol. 20:2036-2039.
30. Hine, E., K. McGuigan, and M. W. Blows 2011. Natural selection stops the evolution of male attractiveness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 108:3659-3664.
31. Holland, B. 2002. Sexual selection fails to promote adaptation to a new environment. Evolution 56:721-730.
32. Hosken, D. J., W. Bailey, J. O'Shea, and J. Roberts 1994. Localization of insect calls by the batNyctophilus geoffroyi(Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae)-a laboratory study. Aust. J. Zool. 42:177-184.
33. Hosken, D. J., P. Stockley, T. Tregenza, and N. Wedell 2009. Monogamy and the battle of the sexes. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 54:361-378.
34. Hosken, D. J., M. L. Taylor, K. Hoyle, S. Higgins, and N. Wedell 2008. Attractive males have greater success in sperm competition. Curr. Biol. 18:R553-R554.
35. Hunt, J., C. J. Breuker, J. A. Sadowski, and A. J. Moore 2009. Male-male competition, female mate choice and their interaction: determining total sexual selection. J. Evol. Biol. 22:13-26.
36. Ingleby, F. C., J. Hunt, and D. J. Hosken 2010. The role of genotype-by-environment interactions in sexual selection. J. Evol. Biol. 23:2031-2045.
37. Innocenti, P., and E. H. Morrow 2010. The sexually antagonistic genes ofDrosophila melanogaster. PLoS Biol. 8:e1000335, doi:
38. Jackson, L. L. 1996. Involvement of cuticular hydrocarbons in the incomplete behavior isolation betweenDrosophila affinisandDrosophila melanogaster. Pp. 320. The 37thDrosophilaConference, San Diego.
39. Jallon, J. M. 1984. A few chemical words exchanged byDrosophiladuring courtship and mating. Behav. Genet. 14:441-478.
40. Kent, C., R. Azanchi, B. Smith, A. Chu, and J. Levine 2007. A model based analysis of chemical and temporal patterns of cuticular hydrocarbons in maleDrosophila melanogaster. PLoS ONE 2:e962, doi:
41. Kent, C., R. Azanchi, B. Smith, A. Formosa, and J. D. Levine 2008. Social context influences chemical communication inD. melanogastermales. Curr. Biol. 18:1384-1389.
42. Kirkpatrick, M. 1985. Evolution of female choice and male parental investment in polygynous species: the demise of the 'sexy son. Am. Nat. 125:788-810.
43. Krupp, J. J., C. Kent, J. C. Billeter, R. Azanchi, A. K. C. So, J. A. Schonfeld, B. P. Smith, C. Lucas, and J. D. Levine 2008. Social experience modifies pheromone expression and mating behavior in maleDrosophila melanogaster. Curr. Biol. 18:1373-1383.
44. Kwan, L., and H. D. Rundle 2010. Adaptation to desiccation fails to generate pre- and postmating isolation in replicateDrosophila melanogasterlaboratory populations. Evolution 64:710-723.
45. Lande, R. 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78:3721-3725.
46. Markow, T. A., and E. C. Toolson 1990. Temperature effects on epicuticular hydrocarbons and sexual isolation inDrosophila mojavensis. Pp. 315-331 in J. S. F. Barker, W. T. Starmer, and R. J. MacIntyre, eds. Ecological and evolutionary genetics f Drosophila. Plenum Press, New York
47. McGuigan, K., A. Van Homrigh, and M. W. Blows 2008. An evolutionary limit to male mating success. Evolution 62:1528-1537.
48. Mead, L. S., and S. J. Arnold 2004. Quantitative genetic models of sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19:264-271.
49. Murphy, P. A., J. T. Giesel, and M. N. Manlove 1983. Temperature effects on life history variation inDrosophila simulans. Evolution 37:1181-1192.
50. Okada, K., J. D. Blount, M. D. Sharma, R. R. Snook, and D. J. Hosken 2011. Male attractiveness, fertility and susceptibility to oxidative stress are influenced by inbreeding inDrosophila simulans. J. Evol. Biol. 24:363-371.
51. Pechine, J. M., C. Antony, and J. M. Jallon 1988. Precise characterization of cuticular compounds in youngDrosophilaby mass-spectrometry. J. Chem. Ecol. 14:1071-1085.
52. Petfield, D., S. F. Chenoweth, H. D. Rundle, and M. W. Blows 2005. Genetic variance in female condition predicts indirect genetic variance in male sexual display traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:6045-6050.
53. Pomiankowski, A., Y. Iwasa, and S. Nee 1991. The evolution of costly mate preferences. I. Fisher and biased mutation. Evolution 45:1422-1430.
54. Rand, A. S., and M. J. Ryan 1981. The adaptive significance of a complex vocal repertoire in a Neotropical frog. Z. Tierpsychol. 57:209-214.
55. Rice, W. R., and A. K. Chippindale 2001. Intersexual ontogenetic conflict. J. Evol. Biol. 14:685-693.
56. Rundle, H. D., S. F. Chenoweth, and M. W. Blows 2008. Comparing complex fitness surfaces: among-population variation in mutual sexual selection inDrosophila serrata. Am. Nat. 171:443-454.
57. Rundle, H. D., S. F. Chenoweth, and M. W. Blows 2009. The diversification of mate preferences by natural and sexual selection. J. Evol. Biol. 22:1608-1615.
58. Savarit, F., and J. F. Ferveur 2002. Temperature affects the ontogeny of sexually dimorphic cuticular hydrocarbons inDrosophila melanogaster. J. Exp. Biol. 205:3241-3249.
59. Schaner, A. M., P. D. Dixon, K. J. Graham, and L. L. Jackson 1989. Components of the courtship-stimulating pheromone blend of young maleDrosophila melanogaster: (Z)-13-tritriacontene and (Z)-11-tritriacontene. J. Insect Physiol. 35:341-345.
60. Shuker, D. M. 2010. Sexual selection: endless forms or tangled bank Anim. Behav. 79: E11-E17.
61. Sharma, M. D., T. Tregenza, and D. J. Hosken 2010. Female mate preferences inDrosophila simulans: evolution and costs. J. Evol. Biol. 23:1672-1679.
62. Sharma, M. D., C. Mitchell, J. Hunt, T. Tregenza, and D. J. Hosken 2011. The genetics of cuticular hydrocarbon profiles in the fruit fly Drosophila simulans. J. Hered. In press
63. Skroblin, A., and M. W. Blows 2006. Measuring natural and sexual selection on breeding values of male display traits inDrosophila serrata. J. Evol. Biol. 19:35-41.
64. Tabachnick, B., and L. Fidell 1989. Using multivariate statistics. Harper Collins, New York
65. Taylor, M. L., N. Wedell, and D. J. Hosken 2007. The heritability of attractiveness. Curr. Biol. 17:R959-R960.
66. Taylor, M. L., N. Wedell, and D. J. Hosken 2008a. Sexual selection and female fitness inDrosophila simulans. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62:721-728.
67. Taylor, M. L., C. Wigmore, D. J. Hodgson, N. Wedell, and D. J. Hosken 2008b. Multiple mating increases female fitness inDrosophila simulans. Anim. Behav. 76:963-970.
68. Toolson, E. C. 1982. Effects of rearing temperature on cuticle permeability and epicuticular lipid composition inDrosophila pseudoobscura. J. Exp. Zool. 222:249-253.
69. Toolson, E. C., and R. Kuper-Simbrón 1989. Laboratory evolution of epicuticular hydrocarbon composition and cuticular permeability inDrosophila pseudoobscura-effects on sexual dimorphism and thermal acclimation ability. Evolution 43:468-473.
70. Tregenza, T., S. H. Buckley, V. L. Pritchard, and R. K. Butlin 2000. Inter- and intrapopulation effects of sex and age on epicuticular composition of meadow grasshopper, Chorthippus parallelus. J. Chem. Ecol. 26: 257-278.
71. Tuttle, M. D., and M. J. Ryan 1981. Bat predation and the evolution of frog vocalizations in the neotropics. Science 214:677-678.
72. Wade, M. J. 1987. Measuring sexual selection. Pp. 197-207 in J. W. Bradbury and M. B. Andersson, eds. Sexual selection: testing the alternatives. Wiley, Chichester
73. Wicker-Thomas, C. 2007. Pheromonal communication involved in courtship behavior in Diptera. J. Insect Physiol. 53:1089-1100.
74. Wilkinson, G. S. 1987. Equilibrium analysis of sexual selection inDrosophila melanogaster. Evolution 41:11-21.
75. Wright, L. I., T. Tregenza, and D. J. Hosken 2008. Inbreeding, inbreeding depression and extinction. Conserv. Genet. 9:833-843.
76. Zahavi, A. 1975. Mate selection: a selection for a handicap. J. Theor. Biol. 53:205-214.
77. Zuk, M., J. T. Rotenberry, and R. M. Tinghitella 2006. Silent night: adaptive disappearance of a sexual signal in a parasitized population of field crickets. Biol. Lett. 2:521-524.