Erratum to: Site effect assessment using KiK-net data: Part 1. A simple correction procedure for surface/downhole spectral ratios, (Bull Earthquake Eng, 10.1007/s10518-011-9283-1);Site effect assessment using KiK-net data: Part 1. A simple correction procedure for surface/downhole spectral ratios

Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 421-448

  Héloïse, Cadet ^a,b,c   Bard, Pierre Yves ^a   Rodriguez Marek, Adrian ^d  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b Regional Laboratory of Nice   (France)

^c ITSAK Institute of Engineering Seismology and Earthquake Engineering   (Greece)

^d VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Borehole transfer function; Depth effects correction; Impedance effects normalization; KiK net; Site effects

Indexed keywords

EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS; SHEAR FLOW; SHEAR WAVES; WAVE PROPAGATION;

AMPLITUDE CORRECTION; CORRECTION PROCEDURE; DEPTH EFFECTS; DESTRUCTIVE INTERFERENCE; FREQUENCY DEPENDENT; KIK-NET; SHEAR WAVE VELOCITY; SITE EFFECTS;

TRANSFER FUNCTIONS;

AMPLIFICATION; BOREHOLE; CORRECTION; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; OUTCROP; S-WAVE; SITE EFFECT; VELOCITY PROFILE; WAVE VELOCITY;

EID: 84857688106     PISSN: 1570761X     EISSN: 15731456     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-011-9323-x     Document Type: Erratum

References (36)

1. Abercrombie RE (1997) Near-surface attenuation and site effects from comparison of surface and deep borehole recordings. Bull Seismol Soc Am 87(3): 731-744.
2. Aoi S, Obara K, Hori S, Kasahara K, Okada Y (2000) New Japanese uphole/downhole, strong-motion observation network: kiknet. Seismol Res Lett 72: 239.
3. Archuleta R, Seale SH, Sangas PV, Baker LM, Swain ST (1992) Garner Valley downhole array of accelerometers: instrumentation and preliminary data analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 82: 1592-1621.
4. Assimaki D, Li W, Steidl JH, Tsuda K (2008) Site amplification and attenuation via downhole array seismogram inversion: a comparative study of the 2003 Miyagi-Oki, aftershock sequence. Bull Seismol Soc Am 98(1): 301-330. doi: 10. 1785/0120070030.
5. Bard P-Y, Gariel J-C (1986) The seismic response of two-dimensional sedimentary deposits with large vertical velocity gradients. Bull Seismol Soc Am 76(2): 343-346.
6. Beresnev IA, Wen K-L (1996) The accuracy of soil response estimates using soil-to-rock spectral ratios. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86(2): 519-523, April 1996, Short Notes.
7. Bonilla LF, Steidl JH, Lindley GT, Tumarkin AG, Archuleta RJ (1997) Site amplification in the San Fernando Valley, California: variability of site-effect estimation using the shear wave, Coda, and H/V methods. Bull Seismol Soc Am 87(3): 710-730.
8. Bonilla LF, Steidl JH, Gariel J-C, Archuleta RJ (2002) Borehole response studies at the Garner Valley Downhole Array, Southern California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92: 3165-3179.
9. Boore DM (2003) Simulation of ground motion using the stochastic method. Pure Appl Geophys 160: 635-676.
10. Boore DM, Joyner WB (1997) Site amplifications for generic rock sites. Bull Seismol Soc Am 74(5): 2035-2039.
11. Borcherdt RD (1970) Effect on local geology on ground motion near San Francisco bay. Bull Seismol Soc Am 60: 29-61.
12. Cadet H (2007) Utilisation combine des méthodes basées sur le bruit de fond dans le cadre du microzonage sismique. Doctoral thesis of the Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble.
13. Cadet H, Bard P-Y, Rodriguez-Marek A (2010) Defining a standard rock: proposition based on the KiK-net database. Bull Seismol Soc Am 100(1): 172-195. doi: 10. 1785/0120090078.
14. th European conference on earthquake engineering, paper reference 589, London.
15. Cotton F, Pousse G, Bonilla LF, Scherbaum F (2008) On the discrepancy of recent European ground motion observation and predictions from empirical models. Analysis of KIKnet accelerometric data and point source stochastic simulations. Bull Seismol Soc Am 98(5): 2244-2261.
16. EN 1998-1, Eurocode 8 (1998) Design of structures for earthquake resistance-Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. EN 1998, European committee for standardization.
17. Field EH (1996) Spectral amplification in a sediment-filled valley exhibiting clear basin-edge-induced waves. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86: 991-1005.
18. Fujiwara H, Aoi S, Kunugi T, Adachi S (2004) Strong-Motion Observation Networks of NIED: K-NET and KIK-net. http://www.cosmos-eq.org/Projects/Fujiwara_paper.pdf, abstract.
19. Kawase H (2006) Borehole observations for site effect studies. In: Third international symposium on the effects of surface geology on seismic motion Grenoble, France, vol 1, pp 3-20, 30 August to 1 September 2006.
20. Kennett BLN (1974) Reflections, rays, and reverberations. Bull Seismol Soc Am 64(6): 1685-1696.
21. Kinoshita S (1998) Kyoshin Net (K-NET). Bull Seismol Soc Am 69(4): 309-332.
22. Kokusho T, Sato K (2008) Surface-to-base amplification evaluated from KiK-net vertical array strong motion records. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 28(9): 707-716.
23. Konno K, Ohmachi T (1998) Ground-motion characteristics estimated from spectral ratio between horizontal and vertical components of microtremor. Bull Seismol Soc Am 88(1): 228-241.
24. Lachet C, Hatzfeld D, Bard P-Y, Papaioannou NC, Savvaidis A (1996) Effects and microzonation in the city of Thessaloniki (Greece)-comparison of different approaches. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86(6): 1692-1703.
25. Lermo J, Chavez-Garcia FJ (1993) Site effect evaluation using spectral ratios with only one station. Bull Seismol Soc Am 83(5): 1574-1594.
26. Marrara F, Suhadolc P (2001) 2D modeling of site effect along the EURO-SEISTEST array (Volvi Graben, Greece). Pure Appl Geophys 158: 2369-23688.
27. Malagnini L, Mayeda K, Akinci A, Bragato PL (2004) Estimating absolute site effects. Bull Seismol Soc Am 94(4): 1343-1352.
28. Oth A, Bindi D, Parolai S, Di Giacomo D (2011) Spectral analysis of K-NET and KiK-net Data in Japan, Part II: On attenuation characteristics, source spectra, and site response of borehole and surface stations. Bull Seismol Soc Am 101(2): 667-687. doi: 10. 1785/0120100135.
29. Pousse G (2005) Analyse des données accélérométriques de K-net et KIK-net: Implications sur la prédiction du mouvement sismique-accélérogrammes et spectres de réponse -et la prise en compte des effets de site non-linéaires. Ph. D. Thesis, University Joseph Fourier, Grenoble I, October 2005, 238 pages (in French).
30. Raptakis D, Chavez-Garcia FJ, Makra K, Pitilakis K (2000) Site effects at Euroseistest-I. Determination of the valley structure and confrontation of observations with 1D analysis. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 19: 1-22.
31. Steidl JH, Tumarkin AG, Archuleta RJ (1996) What is a reference site?. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86(6): 1733-1748.
32. Theodulidis N, Bard P-Y (1995) Horizontal to vertical spectral ratio and geological conditions-an analysis of strong ground motion data from Greece and Taiwan (smart-1). Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 14(3): 177-197.
33. Theodulidis N, Bard P-Y, Archuleta R, Bouchon M (1996) Horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio and geological conditions: the case of Garner Valley Downhole Array in southern California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86(2): 306-319.
34. Thompson EM, Baise LG, Kayen RE, Guzina BB (2009) Impediments to predicting site response: seismic property estimation and modeling simplifications. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99(5): 2927-2949.
35. Yu J, Haines J (2003) The choice of reference sites for seismic ground amplification analyses: case study at Parkway, New Zealand. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93-2: 713-723.
36. Zhao JX (2006) An empirical site classification method for strong motion station in Japan using H/V response spectral ratio. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96(3): 914-925.