Attachment ability of sawfly larvae to smooth surfaces

Arthropod Structure and Development

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 145-153

  Voigt, Dagmar ^a   Gorb, Stanislav N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Adhesion; Attachment; Biomechanics; Cryo SEM; Friction; Hymenoptera; Insect; Symphyta

Indexed keywords

ADHESION; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BODY POSITION; CENTRIFUGE; FLY; FRICTION; HYDROPHILICITY; HYDROPHOBICITY; LARVA; NONHUMAN;

ADHESIVENESS; ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; EXTREMITIES; FRICTION; HYMENOPTERA; LARVA; POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATE; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

HEXAPODA; HYMENOPTERA; IRIS PSEUDACORUS; RHADINOCERAEA; SYMPHYTA;

EID: 84857687900     PISSN: 14678039     EISSN: 18735495     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.asd.2011.10.001     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Al Bitar L., Voigt D., Zebitz C.P.W., Gorb S.N. Tarsal morphology and attachment ability of the codling moth Cydia pomonella L. (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae) to smooth surfaces. Journal of Insect Physiology 2009, 55:1029-1038.
2. Betz O. Performance and adaptive value of tarsal morphology in rove beetles of the genus Stenus (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae). Journal of Experimental Biology 2002, 205:1097-1113.
3. Betz O. Adhesive exocrine glands in insects: morphology, ultrastructure, and adhesive secretion. Biological Adhesive Systems. From Nature to Technical and Medical Application 2010, 111-152. Springer, Berlin. J. Byern, I. Grunwald (Eds.).
4. Beutel R., Gorb S.N. Ultrastructure of attachment specializations of hexapods (Arthropoda): evolutionary patterns inferred from a revised ordinal phylogeny. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 2001, 39:177-207.
5. Beutel R.G., Gorb S.N. A revised interpretation of the evolution of attachment structures in Hexapoda with special emphasis on Mantophasmatodea. Arthropod Systematic and Phylogeny 2006, 64:3-25.
6. Bischoff H. Biologie der Hymenopteren. Eine Naturgeschichte der Hautflügler 1927, Verlag von Julius Springer, Berlin.
7. Dai Z., Gorb S., Schwarz U. Roughness-dependent friction force of the tarsal claw system in the beetle Pachnoda marginata (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). Journal of Experimental Biology 2002, 205:2479-2488.
8. Dixon A.F.G., Croghan P.C., Gowing R.P. The mechanism by which aphids adhere to smooth surfaces. Journal of Experimental Biology 1990, 152:243-253.
9. Eigenbrode S.D. Plant surface waxes and insect behaviour. Plant Cuticles - an Integral Functional Approach 1996, 210-222. BIOS Publishers, Oxford. G. Kerstiens (Ed.).
10. Federle W., Rohrseitz K., Hölldobler B. Attachment forces of ants measured with a centrifuge: better " wax runners" have a poorer attachment on smooth surfaces. Journal of Experimental Biology 2000, 203:505-512.
11. Federle W., Baumgartner W., Hölldobler B. Biomechanics of ant adhesive pads: frictional forces are rate- and temperature dependent. Journal of Experimental Biology 2004, 206:67-74.
12. Frölich D., Barthlott W. Mikromorphologie der epiculticularen Wachse und das System der Monokotylen 1988, Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur Mainz-Stuttgart, Steiner Verlag, Wiesbaden.
13. Gold I., Bolton B. The Hymenoptera 1988, Oxford University Press.
14. Gorb E.V., Gorb S.N. Attachment ability of the beetle Chrysolina fastuosa on various plant surfaces. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 2002, 105:13-28.
15. Gorb S., Gorb E. Ontogenesis of the attachment ability in the bug Coreus marginatus (Heteroptera, Insecta). Journal of Experimental Biology 2004, 207:2917-2924.
16. Gorb S., Gorb E., Kastner V. Scale effects on the attachment pads and friction forces in Syrphid flies (Diptera, Syrphidae). Journal of Experimental Biology 2001, 204:1421-1431.
17. Gorb S. Attachment Devices of Insect Cuticle 2001, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
18. Gordh G., Headrick D. A Dictionary of Entomology 2001, Cabi Publishing, Oxon & New York.
19. Griethuijsen L.I.van, Trimmer B.A. Kinematics of horizontal and vertical caterpillar crawling. Journal of Experimental Biology 2009, 212:1455-1462.
20. Hasenfuss I. Die Herkunft der Adhäsionsflüssigkeit bei Insekten. Zoomorphology 1977, 87:51-64.
21. Hasenfuss I. über das Haften von Insekten an glatten Flächen - Herkunft der Adhäsionsflüssigkeit. Zoologische Jahrbücher Anatomie 1978, 99:115-116.
22. Hasenfuss I. The adhesive devices in larvae of Lepidoptera (Insecta, Pterygota). Zoomorphology 1999, 119:143-162.
23. Hinton H.E. On the structure, function, and distribution of the prolegs of the Panorpoidea, with a criticism of the Berlese-Imms theory. Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 1955, 106:455-541.
24. Holloway, P.J., 1967. Studies of the Wettability of Leaf Surfaces. Doctoral Thesis, University of London.
25. Jeffree C.F. The cuticle, epicuticular waxes and trichomes of plants, with reference to their structure, functions, and evolution. Insects and the Plant Surface 1986, 23-64. Edward Arnold Publishers, London. B. Juniper, R. Southwoud (Eds.).
26. Knoll F. über die Ursache des Ausgleitens der Insektenbeine an wachsbedeckten Pflanzenteilen. Jahrbuch Wissenschaftlicher Botanik 1914, 54:448-497.
27. Kwon J., Cheung E., Park S., Sitti M. Friction enhancement via micro-patterned wet elastomer adhesives on small intestinal surfaces. Biomedical Materials 2006, 1:216-228.
28. Leisewitz, W., 1906. Ueber chitinöse Fortbewegungs-Apparate einiger (insbesondere fussloser) Insektenlarven. Dissertation, Kgl. Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.
29. Lin H.-T., Trimmer B.A. The substrate as a skeleton: ground reaction forces from a soft-bodied legged animal. Journal of Experimental Biology 2010, 213:1133-1142.
30. Lin H.-T., Slate D.J., Paetsch C.R., Dorfman A.L., Trimmer B.A. Scaling of caterpillar body properties and its biomechanical implications for the use of a hydrostatic skeleton. Journal of Experimental Biology 2011, 214:1194-1204.
31. Lorenz H., Kraus M. Die Larvalsystematik der Blattwespen, Tenthredinoidea und Megalodontoidea. Abhandlungen zur Larvalsystematik der Insekten 1957, Akademie-Verlag, Berlin.
32. Mezoff S., Papastathis N., Takesian A., Trimmer A. The biomechanical and neural control of hydrostatic limb movements in Manduca sexta. Journal of Experimental Biology 2004, 207:3043-3053.
33. Moser S.E., Haynes K.F., Obrycki J.J. Behavioral response to larval tracks and the influence of tracks on intraguild scavenging by coccinellid larvae. Journal of Insect Behaviour 2010, 23:45-58.
34. Peterson A. Larvae of Insects. Lepidoptera and Hymenoptera. Part I 1948, Edwards Brothers Inc, Michigan.
35. Roth L.M., Willis E.R. Tarsal structure and climbing ability of cockroaches. Journal of Experimental Biology 1952, 119:483-517.
36. Sägesser H., Lüscher M. Orientierung der Larve von Rhadinoceraea micans Kl. (Irisblattwespe). Revue Suisse de Zoologie Geneve 1959, 66:343-346.
37. Scholz I., Baumgartner W., Federle W. Micromechanics of smooth adhesive organs in stick insects: pads are mechanically anisotropic and softer towards the adhesive surface. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 2008, 194:373-384.
38. Snodgrass R.E. Principles of Insect Morphology 1935, McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc, New York & London.
39. Stork N.E. Experimental analysis of adhesion of Chrysopolina polita (Chrysomelidae: Coleoptera) on a variety of surfaces. Journal of Experimental Biology 1980, 88:91-107.
40. Stork N.E. The role of wax blooms in preventing attachment to brassicas by the mustard beetle Phaedon cochleariae. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 1980, 28:100-107.
41. Suzuki Y., Palopoli M.F. Evolution of insect abdominal appendages: are prolegs homologous or convergent traits?. Development Genes and Evolution 2001, 211:486-492.
42. Trimmer B., Issberner J. Kinematics of soft-bodied, legged locomotion in Manduca sexta larvae. Biological Bulletin 2007, 212:130-142.
43. Trueman E.R. The Locomotion of Soft-bodied Animals 1975, Edward Arnold Publishers Ltd, London.
44. Varenberg M., Gorb S. Hexagonal surface micropattern for dry and wet friction. Advanced Materials 2009, 21:483-486.
45. Voigt D., Gorb S. Egg attachment of the asparagus beetle Crioceris asparagi to the crystalline waxy surface of Asparagus officinalis. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 2010, 277:895-903.
46. Voigt D., Schuppert J.M., Dattinger S., Gorb S.N. Sexual dimorphism in the attachment ability of the Colorado potato beetle Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) to rough substrates. Journal of Insect Physiology 2008, 54:765-776.
47. Voigt D., Gorb S.N., Boevé J.-L. Superhydrophobic cuticle with a " pinning effect" in the larvae of the iris sawfly, Rhadinoceraea micans (Hymenoptera, Tenthredinidae). Zoology 2011, 114:265-271.
48. Vötsch W., Nicholson G., Müller R., Stierhof Y.-D., Gorb S., Schwarz U. Chemical composition of the attachment pad secretion of the locust Locusta migratoria. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 2002, 32:1605-1613.
49. Walker G., Yue A.B., Ratcliffe J. The adhesive organ of the blowfly, Calliphora vomitoria: a functional approach (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Journal of Zoology London (A) 1985, 205:297-307.
50. Wendler G. Fortbewegung und sensomotorische Integration. Lehrbuch der Entomologie 2003, 229-272. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg. second ed. K. Dettner, W. Peters (Eds.).
51. Wigglesworth V.B. The Principles of Insect Physiology 1965, E.P. Dutton & Co. Inc, London. sixth ed.