The End(s) of Ethnomethodology

American Sociologist

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 7-20

  Pollner, Melvin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Ethnomethodology; Harold Garfinkel; Reflexivity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857685631     PISSN: 00031232     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12108-011-9144-z     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Atkinson, P. (1988). Ethnomethodology: a critical review. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 441-65.
2. Cicourel, A. V. (1964). Method and measurement in sociology. New York: Free Press.
3. Garfinkel, H. (1964). Studies of the routine grounds of everyday life. Social Problems, 11, 225-50.
4. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5. Garfinkel, H. (1974). The origins of the term 'ethnomethodology. In R. Turner (Ed.), Ethnomethodology (pp. 15-18). Baltimore: Penguin Education.
6. Garfinkel, H. (1991). Respecification: evidence for locally produced, naturally accountable phenomena of order, logic, reason, meaning, methods, etc. in and of the essential haeccity of immortal ordinary society (i)-an announcement of studies. In G. Button (Ed.), Ethnomethodology and the human sciences (pp. 10-19). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Garfinkel, H. (2002). Ethnomethodology's program: Working out Durkheim's Aphorism (edited and introduced by Anne Rawls). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
8. Garfinkel, H., & Sacks, H. (1970). On the formal structures of practical actions. In J. C. McKinney & E. A. Tiryakian (Eds.), Theoretical sociology: Perspecitves and developments (pp. 337-66). New York: Appleton.
9. Garfinkel, H., & Wieder, D. L. (1992). Evidence for locally produced, naturally accountable phenomena of order*, Logic, reason, meaning, method, etc., in and as of the essentially unavoidable and irremediable haecceity of immortal ordinary society: IV two incommensurable, asymmetrically alternate technologies of social analysis. In G. Watson & R. Seiler (Eds.), Texts in context: Contributions to ethnomethodology (pp. 175-206). London: Sage.
10. Geertz, C. (1983). Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
11. Hill, R., & Crittenden, K. (1968). Proceedings of the Purdue symposium on ethnomethodology. Institute for the study of social change, Department of sociology. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University.
12. Liberman, K. (2004). Dialectical practice in Tibetan philosophical culture: An ethnomethodological inquiry into formal reasoning. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
13. Lynch, M. (1993). Scientific practice and ordinary action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14. Lynch, M. (2000). Against reflexivity as an academic virtue and source of privileged knowledge. Theory, Culture and Society, 17, 26-54.
15. Maynard, D. W., & Clayman, S. E. (1991). The diversity of ethnomethodology. Annual Review of Sociology., 17, 385-418.
16. McHugh, P., Raffel, S., Foss, D. C., & Blum, A. (1974). On the beginning of social inquiry. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
17. Mehan, H., & Wood, H. (1975). The reality of ethnomethodology. New York: Wiley.
18. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). The visible and the invisible. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
19. Peyrot, M. (1982). Understanding ethnomethodology: a remedy for some common misconceptions. Human Studies, 5, 261-83.
20. Pollner, M. (1991). Left of ethnomethodology: the rise and decline of radical reflexivity. American Sociological Review, 56, 370-80.
21. Pollner, M., & Emerson, R. M. (2001). Ethnomethodology and Ethnography. In P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, S. Delamont, J. Lofland, & L. Lofland (Eds.), Handbook of ethnography (pp. 118-35). Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
22. Rawls, A. W. (2002). Editor's Introduction. In H. Garfinkel (Ed), Ethnomethodology's Program (pp. 1-64). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
23. Sharrrock, W. (2004). What Garfinkel makes of Schutz: the past, present and future of an alternate, asymmetric and incommensurable approach to sociology. Theory and Science, 5 (ISSN: 1527-5558).
24. Wieder, D. L. (1988 [1974]). Language and Social Reality. Landham, MD: University Press of America.
25. Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical investigations. New York: Macmillan.
26. Zimmerman, D. H., & Pollner, M. (1970). The everyday world as a phenomenon. In J. Douglas (Ed.), Understanding everyday life (pp. 80-104). Chicago: Aldine.