Networks and Public Policies in the Global South: The Chilean Case and the Future of the Developmental Network State

Studies in Comparative International Development

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 1-22

  Negoita, Marian ^a   Block, Fred ^b  

^a University of California Davis ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Developmental state; Industrial upgrading; Innovation systems; Network forms of organization; Technology transfer

Indexed keywords

DECENTRALIZATION; DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS; ECONOMIC GROWTH; ECONOMIC POLICY; INNOVATION; NETWORKING; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

CHILE;

EID: 84857671491     PISSN: 00393606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12116-012-9097-4     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Agosin M, Bravo-Ortega C. The emergence of new successful export activities in Latin America: the case of Chile. Research Network Working Paper #R-552. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank; 2009.
2. Agosin M, Larraín C, Grau N. Industrial policy in Chile. Working Paper STD 294. Santiago: University of Chile; 2009.
3. Arbix G, Martin SB. Beyond the developmental state, beyond neoliberalism: rethinking state capacities in the New Brazil. Paper at the colloquium: the Brazilian State: paths and prospects of dirigisme and liberalization, 9-10 November, New York; 2009.
4. Barton JR. Environment, sustainability and regulation in commercial aquaculture: the case of Chilean Salmonid production. Geoforum. 1997; 28: 313-28.
5. Benavente JM. Wine production in Chile. In: Chandra V, editor. Technology, adaptation, and exports-how some developing countries got it right. Washington: World Bank; 2006. p. 225-42.
6. Benavente JM, Crespi G. The impact of an associative strategy (the PROFO Program) on Small and Medium Enterprises in Chile. SPRU Electronic Working Paper no. 88. Brighton: University of Sussex; 2003.
7. Best MH. Cluster dynamics in Malaysian electronics. In: Jomo KS, editor. Malaysian industrial policy. Singapore: National University of Singapore Press; 2007. p. 249-76.
8. Block F. Swimming against the current: the rise of a hidden developmental state in the United States. Polit Soc. 2008; 36: 169-206.
9. Block F, Keller MR. Where do innovations come from? Transformations in the US economy, 1970-2006. Soc Econ Rev. 2009; 7: 459-83.
10. Block F, Keller MR, editors. State of innovation: technology policy in the United States. Boulder: Paradigm; 2011.
11. Breznitz D. Innovation and the state: political choice and strategies for growth in Israel, Taiwan, and Ireland. New Haven: Yale University Press; 2007.
12. Breznitz D. Ideas, structure, state action and economic growth: rethinking the Irish miracle. Rev Int Polit Economy 2010, iFirst.
13. Central Bank of Chile. Statistics Database. (http://si3. bcentral. cl/Siete/secure/cuadros/home. aspx). Accessed 16 November 2011.
14. Chollett DL. From sugar to blackberries restructuring agro-export production in Michoacán, Mexico. Lat Am Perspect. 2009; 36: 79-92.
15. de Mello L. Managing Chile's macroeconomy during and after the copper price boom. OECD Economics Department Working Papers 605. Paris, France: OECD Publishing; 2008.
16. Evans P. Embedded autonomy: states and industrial transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1995.
17. Fuentes JR. Managing natural resources revenue: the case of Chile. OxCarre Research paper 40. Oxford: Oxford Centre for the Analysis of Resource Rich Economies; 2009.
18. Gallagher K, editor. Putting development first: the importance of policy space in the WTO and IFIs. London: Zed Books; 2005.
19. Gerschenkron A. Economic backwardness in historical perspective: a book of essays. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 1962.
20. Goldberg M, Palladini E. Chile: a strategy to promote innovative small and medium enterprises. Policy Research Working Paper 4518. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2008.
21. Gwynne RN. Governance and the wine commodity chain: upstream and downstream strategies in New Zealand and Chilean wine firms. Asia Pac View. 2006; 47: 381-95.
22. Havro G, Santiso J. Benefiting the resource rich: how can international development policy help tame the resource curse? Working Paper 355. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies; 2011.
23. Heller P, Rueschemeyer D, Snyder R. Dependency and development in a globalized world: looking back and forward. Stud Comp Int Dev. 2009; 44: 287-95.
24. Hernandez-Cuevas C, Valenzuela PDT. Strategies to capture biotechnology opportunities in Chile. Electron J Biotechn. 2004; 7: 191-207.
25. Iikzuka M, Katz J. Natural resource industries, 'Tragedy of the Commons', and the case of Chilean salmon farming. Working Paper Series No. 61. Maastricht: United Nations University; 2010.
26. Johnson C. MITI and the Japanese miracle: the growth of industrial policy, 1929-1975. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1982.
27. Katz J. Salmon Farming in Chile. In: Chandra V, editor. Technology, adaptation, and exports - how some developing countries got it right. Washington: World Bank; 2006. p. 193-224.
28. Kharas H, Leipziger D, Maloney W, Thillainathan R, Hesse H. Chilean growth through East Asian eyes. Working Paper no. 31. Washington: Commission on Growth and Development; 2008.
29. Kim, SY. Transitioning from Fast Follower to Innovator: The Institutional Foundations of the Korean Telecommunications Sector. Rev Int Pol Econ 2010, iFirst: 1-29.
30. Kohli A. States and economic development. Braz J Pol Econ. 2009; 29: 212-27.
31. Kurtz MJ. State developmentalism without a developmental state: the public foundations of the "free market miracle" in Chile. Lat Am Polit Soc. 2001; 43: 1-25.
32. Kurtz MJ. The social foundations of institutional order: reconsidering war and the 'resource curse' in third world state building. Polit Soc. 2009; 37: 479-520.
33. Kurtz MJ, Brooks SM. Embedding neoliberal reform in Latin America. World Polit. 2008; 60: 231-80.
34. Lall S. Reinventing industrial strategy: the role of government policy in building industrial competitiveness. G-24 Discussion Paper Series. New York and Geneva: United Nations; 2004.
35. Lawrence PR, Lorsch JW. Differentiation and integration in complex organizations. Admin Sci Q. 1967; 12: 1-47.
36. Maman D, Rosenhek Z. The institutional dynamics of a developmental state: change and continuity in state-economy relations in Israel. Working Paper Series No. 5-2011. Raanana: The Open University of Israel, 2011.
37. Mathews JA. Electronics in Taiwan-a case of technological learning. In: Chandra V, editor. Technology, adaptation, and exports - how some developing countries got it right. Washington: World Bank; 2006. p. 83-126.
38. McDermott GA. The politics of institutional renovation and economic upgrading: recombining the vines that bind in Argentina. Polit Soc. 2007; 35: 103-43.
39. Nayyar D. Learning to unlearn from development. Oxf Dev Stud. 2008; 36: 259-80.
40. Nelson RC. Transnational strategic networks and policymaking in Chile: CORFO's high technology investment promotion program. Lat Am Polit Soc. 2007; 49: 149-81.
41. Ó Riain S. The politics of high-tech growth: developmental network states in the global economy. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2004.
42. Ó Riain S. From developmental network state to market managerialism in Ireland. In: Block F, Keller MR, editors. State of innovation: technology policy in the United States. Boulder: Paradigm; 2011.
43. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Demand-side Innovation Policies. OECD Publishing; 2011.
44. Perez-Aleman P. Learning, adjustment and economic development: transforming firms, the state and associations in Chile. World Dev. 2000; 28: 41-55.
45. Perez-Aleman P. Cluster formation, institutions and learning: the emergence of clusters and development in Chile. Ind Corp Chang. 2005; 14: 1-27.
46. Pfeffer J, Salancik G. The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row; 1979.
47. Podolny J, Page K. Network forms of organization. Annu Rev Sociol. 1998; 24: 57-76.
48. Porter ME. Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harv Bus Rev. 1998; 76: 77-90.
49. Powell W. Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization. Res Organ Behav. 1990; 12: 295-336.
50. Raynolds LT. The organic agro-export boom in Dominican Republic: maintaining tradition or fostering transformation? Lat Am Res Rev. 2008; 43: 161-84.
51. Rodrik D. Industrial policy for the twenty-first century. Faculty Research Working Papers Series RWP04-047. Cambridge: Harvard University; 2004.
52. Rodrik D. Goodbye Washington Consensus, Hello Washington Confusion? A review of the World Bank's 'Economic growth in the 1990s: learning from a decade of reform'. J Econ Lit. 2006; 44: 973-87.
53. Romani G, Atienza M, Amoros JE. Financing entrepreneurial activity in Chile: scale and scope of public support programs. Ventur Cap. 2009; 11: 55-70.
54. Rugraff E. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) and supplier-oriented upgrading in the Czech motor vehicle industry. Reg Stud. 2009; 44: 627-38.
55. Sabel CF. Bootstrapping development: rethinking the role of public intervention in promoting growth. New York: Columbia University; 2005.
56. Saxenian A. Regional advantage: culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1996.
57. Schrank A, Kurtz MJ. Credit where credit is due: open economy industrial policy and export diversification in Latin America and the Caribbean. Polit Soc. 2005; 33: 671-702.
58. Schrank A, Whitford J. The anatomy of network failure. Sociol Theory. 2011; 29: 151-77.
59. Schurman RA. Chile's new entrepreneurs and the 'economic miracle': the invisible hand or a hand from the state? Stud Comp Int Dev. 1996; 31: 83-109.
60. Silva E. From dictatorship to democracy: the business-state Nexus in Chile's economic transformation, 1975-1994. Comp Polit. 1996; 28: 299-320.
61. Smith-Doerr L, Powell WW. Networks and economic life. In: Smelser N, Swedberg R, editors. The handbook of economic sociology. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2005. p. 379-402.
62. Spencer JW, Gomez C. Can government policies promote entrepreneurship? Evidence from Costa Rica, Uruguay and Chile. Working Paper Series. Washington: George Washington University; 2001.
63. Tan H. Evaluating SME support programs in Chile using panel firm data. Policy Research Working Paper 5082. Washington: World Bank; 2009.
64. Viotti EB. National learning systems: a new approach on technological change in late industrializing economies and evidences from the cases of Brazil and South Korea. Technol Forecast Soc. 2002; 69: 653-80.
65. Wade RH. Governing the market: economic theory and the role of government in East Asian industrialization. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1990.
66. Wade RH. What strategies are viable for developing countries today? The World Trade Organization and the shrinking of 'development space'. Rev Int Polit Econ. 2003; 10: 621-44.
67. Weiss L. The transformative state: return, renewal, or rediscovery? Paper presented at Conference on New economic Thinking, Teaching and Policy Perspective: A Brazilian Perspective within a Global Dialogue. Rio de Janeiro, November 2011.
68. Whitford J, Schrank A. The paradox of the weak state revisited: industrial policy, network governance, and political decentralization. In: Block F, Keller MR, editors. State of innovation: technology policy in the United States. Boulder: Paradigm; 2011.
69. Williamson J. What Washington means by policy reform. In: Williamson J, editor. Latin American adjustment: how much has happened? Washington: Institute for International Economics; 1990.
70. World Bank. World Development Indicators Database. (http://data. worldbank. org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators). Accessed 13 June 2011.