How many spots with missing values can be tolerated in quantitative two-dimensional gel electrophoresis when applying univariate statistics?

Journal of Proteomics

Volumn 75, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1792-1802

  Zellner, Maria ^a   Graf, Alexandra ^a   Zehetmayer, Sonja ^a   Winkler, Wolfgang ^b   Staes, An ^c,d   Gevaert, Kris ^c,d   Vandekerckhove, Joël ^c,d   Marchetti Deschmann, Martina ^b   Miller, Ingrid ^e   Bauer, Peter ^a   Allmaier, Günter ^b   Oehler, Rudolf ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

^c DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SYSTEMS BIOLOGY   (Belgium)

^d GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^e UNIVERSITY OF VETERINARY MEDICINE   (Austria)

Author keywords

2 DE; DIGE; Gel replicates; Missing values; Proteomics; Quantification

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; GEL; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TWO DIMENSIONAL GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS;

BLOOD PROTEINS; ELECTROPHORESIS, GEL, TWO-DIMENSIONAL; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH DESIGN; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84857650242     PISSN: 18743919     EISSN: 18767737     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2011.12.019     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Pedreschi R., Hertog M.L., Carpentier S.C., Lammertyn J., Robben J., Noben J.P., et al. Treatment of missing values for multivariate statistical analysis of gel-based proteomics data. Proteomics 2008, 8:1371-1383.
2. Krogh M., Fernandez C., Teilum M., Bengtsson S., James P. A probabilistic treatment of the missing spot problem in 2D gel electrophoresis experiments. J Proteome Res 2007, 6:3335-3343.
3. Wood J., White I.R., Cutler P. A likelihood-based approach to defining statistical significance in proteomic analysis where missing data cannot be disregarded. Signal Process 2004, 84:1777-1788.
4. Rubin D. Inference and missing data. Biometrika 1976, 63:581-592.
5. Burton A., Billingham L.J., Bryan S. Cost-effectiveness in clinical trials: using multiple imputation to deal with incomplete cost data. Clin Trials 2007, 4:154-161.
6. Schafer L.J., Graham W.J. Missing data: our view of the state of the art. Psychol Methods 2002, 7:147-177.
7. Winkler W., Zellner M., Diestinger M., Babeluk R., Marchetti M., Goll A., et al. Biological variation of the platelet proteome in the elderly population and its implication for biomarker research. Mol Cell Proteomics 2008, 7:193-203.
8. Zellner M., Winkler W., Hayden H., Diestinger M., Eliasen M., Gesslbauer B., et al. Quantitative validation of different protein precipitation methods in proteome analysis of blood platelets. Electrophoresis 2005, 26:2481-2489.
9. Karp N.A., Kreil D.P., Lilley K.S. Determining a significant change in protein expression with DeCyder during a pair-wise comparison using two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis. Proteomics 2004, 4:1421-1432.
10. Vorm O., Roepstorff P., Mann M. Improved resolution and very high sensitivity in MALDI TOF of matrix surfaces made by fast evaporation. Anal Chem 1994, 66:3281-3287.
11. Mattow J., Schmidt F., Hohenwarter W., Siejak F., Schaible U.E., Kaufmann S.H. Protein identification and tracking in two-dimensional electrophoretic gels by minimal protein identifiers. Proteomics 2004, 4:2927-2941.
12. Smirnov I.P., Zhu X., Taylor T., Huang Y., Ross P., Papayanopoulos I.A., et al. Suppression of alpha-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid matrix clusters and reduction of chemical noise in MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 2004, 76:2958-2965.
13. Zhang W., Chait B.T. ProFound: an expert system for protein identification using mass spectrometric peptide mapping information. Anal Chem 2000, 72:2482-2489.
14. Perkins D.N., Pappin D.J., Creasy D.M., Cottrell J.S. Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 1999, 20:3551-3567.
15. Bairoch A., Apweiler R. The SWISS-PROT protein sequence database: its relevance to human molecular medical research. J Mol Med 1997, 75:312-316.
16. Thompson J.D., Higgins D.G., Gibson T.J. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 1994, 22:4673-4680.
17. Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y. Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. J Royal Stat Soc B 1995, 57:289-300.
18. Schroder S., Zhang H., Yeung E.S., Jansch L., Zabel C., Watzig H. Quantitative gel electrophoresis: sources of variation. J Proteome Res 2008, 7:1226-1234.
19. Karp N.A., McCormick P.S., Russell M.R., Lilley K.S. Experimental and statistical considerations to avoid false conclusions in proteomics studies using differential in-gel electrophoresis. Mol Cell Proteomics 2007, 6:1354-1364.
20. Grove H., Hollung K., Uhlen A.K., Martens H., Faergestad E.M. Challenges related to analysis of protein spot volumes from two-dimensional gel electrophoresis as revealed by replicate gels. J Proteome Res 2006, 5:3399-3410.
21. Karp N.A., Feret R., Rubtsov D.V., Lilley K.S. Comparison of DIGE and post-stained gel electrophoresis with both traditional and SameSpots analysis for quantitative proteomics. Proteomics 2008, 8:948-960.
22. Alban A., David S.O., Bjorkesten L., Andersson C., Sloge E., Lewis S., et al. A novel experimental design for comparative two-dimensional gel analysis: two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis incorporating a pooled internal standard. Proteomics 2003, 3:36-44.
23. Yan J.X., Devenish A.T., Wait R., Stone T., Lewis S., Fowler S. Fluorescence two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry based proteomic analysis of Escherichia coli. Proteomics 2002, 2:1682-1698.
24. Corzett T.H., Fodor I.K., Choi M.W., Walsworth V.L., Chromy B.A., Turteltaub K.W., et al. Statistical analysis of the experimental variation in the proteomic characterization of human plasma by two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis. J Proteome Res 2006, 5:2611-2619.
25. Fodor I.K., Nelson D.O., Alegria-Hartman M., Robbins K., Langlois R.G., Turteltaub K.W., et al. Statistical challenges in the analysis of two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis experiments using DeCyder. Bioinformatics 2005, 21:3733-3740.
26. Molloy M.P., Brzezinski E.E., Hang J., McDowell M.T., VanBogelen R.A. Overcoming technical variation and biological variation in quantitative proteomics. Proteomics 2003, 3:1912-1919.
27. Asirvatham V.S., Watson B.S., Sumner L.W. Analytical and biological variances associated with proteomic studies of Medicago truncatula by two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Proteomics 2002, 2:960-968.
28. Jorge I., Navarro R.M., Lenz C., Ariza D., Porras C., Jorrin J. The holm oak leaf proteome: analytical and biological variability in the protein expression level assessed by 2-DE and protein identification tandem mass spectrometry de novo sequencing and sequence similarity searching. Proteomics 2005, 5:222-234.
29. Challapalli K.K., Zabel C., Schuchhardt J., Kaindl A.M., Klose J., Herzel H. High reproducibility of large-gel two-dimensional electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 2004, 25:3040-3047.
30. Ramirez-Boo M., Garrido J.J., Ogueta S., Calvete J.J., Gomez-Diaz C., Moreno A. Analysis of porcine peripheral blood mononuclear cells proteome by 2-DE and MS: analytical and biological variability in the protein expression level and protein identification. Proteomics 2006, 6(Suppl. 1):S215-S225.
31. Miller I., Crawford J., Gianazza E. Protein stains for proteomic applications: which, when, why?. Proteomics 2006, 6:5385-5408.