Socio-economic differences in the health-related quality of life impact of cardiovascular conditions

European Journal of Public Health

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 301-305

  Stafford, Mai ^a   Soljak, Michael ^b   Pledge, Victoria ^c   Mindell, Jennifer ^c  

^a MEDICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL   (United Kingdom)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; HEALTH DISPARITY; HUMAN; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; MIDDLE AGED; OBESITY; PAIN; QUALITY OF LIFE; RISK FACTOR; SELF CARE; SOCIOECONOMICS; WALKING DIFFICULTY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; DIABETES COMPLICATIONS; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS DISPARITIES; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; MIDDLE AGED; MOBILITY LIMITATION; OBESITY; PAIN; QUALITY OF LIFE; RISK FACTORS; SELF CARE; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84857648353     PISSN: 11011262     EISSN: 1464360X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckr007     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Better Regulation Executive. Preparing Impact Assessments. Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. Available at http://www.berr.gov.uk/whatwedo/ bre/policy/scrutinising-new-regulations/preparing-impact-assessments/toolkit/ page44199.html (10 September 2009, date last accessed).
2. Weinstein MC, Torrance G, McGuire A. QALYs: the Basics. Value Health 2009;12:S5-9.
3. Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, et al. Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001: systematic analysis of population health data. Lancet 2006;367:1747-57.
4. World Health Organisation. WHO health statistics and health information systems. The global burden of disease: 2004 update. Geneva, Switzerland: Global Burden of Disease Project, 2009.
5. Nyman JA, Barleen NA, Dowd BE, et al. Quality-of-life weights for the US population: self-reported health status and priority health conditions, by demographic characteristics. Med Care 2007;45:618-28.
6. Burstrom K, Johannesson M, Diderichsen F. Health-related quality of life by disease and socio-economic group in the general population in Sweden. Health Policy 2001;55:51-69.
7. Brooks R, Rabin R, de Charro F. The measurement and valuation of health status using EQ-5D: a European perspective. Evidence from the EuroHRQoL BIO MED research programme. New York: Springer, 2003.
8. Chuang LH, Zarate V, Kind P. Estimating domestic values for EQ-5D health states using survey data from external sources. Med Care 2009;47:168-75.
9. Ko Y, Coons SJ. Self-reported chronic conditions and EQ-5D index scores in the US adult population. Curr Med Res Opin 2006;22:2065-71.
10. Wang H, Kindig DA, Mullahy J. Variation in Chinese population health related quality of life: results from a EuroHRQoL study in Beijing, China. Qual Life Res 2005;14:119-32.
11. Barton GR, Sach TH, Doherty M, et al. An assessment of the discriminative ability of the EQ-5D index, SF-6D, and EQ VAS, using sociodemographic factors and clinical conditions. Eur J Health Econ 2008;9:237-49.
12. Burstrom K, Johannesson M, Diderichsen F. Swedish population health-related quality of life results using the EQ-5D. Qual Life Res 2001;10:621-35.
13. Saarni SI, Harkanen T, Sintonen H, et al. The impact of 29 chronic conditions on health-related quality of life: a general population survey in Finland using 15D and EQ-5D. Qual Life Res 2006;15:1403-14.
14. Saarni SI, Suvisaari J, Sintonen H, et al. The health-related quality-of-life impact of chronic conditions varied with age in general population. J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60:1288-97.
15. Failde II, Soto MM. Changes in health related quality of life 3 months after an acute coronary syndrome. BMC Public Health 2006;6:18.
16. Sacker A, Head J, Bartley M. Impact of coronary heart disease on health functioning in an aging population: are there differences according to socioeconomic position? Psychosom Med 2008;70:133-40.
17. Le Grande MR, Elliott PC, Murphy BM, et al. Health related quality of life trajectories and predictors following coronary artery bypass surgery. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006;4:49.
18. Lubetkin EI, Jia H, Franks P, Gold MR. Relationship among sociodemographic factors, clinical conditions, and health-related quality of life: examining the EQ-5D in the U.S. general population. Qual Life Res 2005;14:2187-96.
19. Craig R, Mindell J, editors. Health survey for England 2006: cardiovascular disease and risk factors. London: Information Centre, 2007.
20. Kind P, Brooks R, Rabin R. EQ-5D concepts and methods: a developmental history. New York: Springer, 2005.
21. Dolan P, Gudex C, Kind P, Williams A. The time trade-off method: results from a general population study. Health Econ 1996;5:141-54.
22. Xie J, Wu EQ, Zheng ZJ, et al. Impact of stroke on health-related quality of life in the noninstitutionalized population in the United States. Stroke 2006;37:2567-72.
23. Haacke C, Althaus A, Spottke A, et al. Long-term outcome after stroke: evaluating health-related quality of life using utility measurements. Stroke 2006;37:193-8.
24. Pickard AS, Johnson JA, Feeny DH. Responsiveness of generic health-related quality of life measures in stroke. Qual Life Res 2005;14:207-19.
25. Fiscella K, Tancredi D. Socioeconomic status and coronary heart disease risk prediction. JAMA 2008;300:2666-8.
26. Department of Health. Saving lives: our healthier nation. London: Department of Health, 1999, Available at: www.dh.gov.uk/en/ Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH-4118614 (16 July 2010, date last accessed).
27. Department of Health. The national inequalities targets. London: Department of Health, 2001, Available at: www.dh.gov.uk/en/ Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH-4010168 (16 July 2010, date last accessed).
28. Fryback DG, Dunham NC, Palta M, et al. US norms for six generic health-related quality-of-life indexes from the National Health Measurement Study. Med Care 2007;45:1162-70.
29. Department for Business E&RR. Impact assessment guidance and toolkit. Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform, 2009. Available at: http://www.berr.gov.uk/whatwedo/bre/policy/scrutinising-new-regulations/ preparing-impact-assessments/ page44077.html/ (22 April 2009, date last accessed).
30. National Institute for Health & Clinical Excellence. Updated guide to the methods of technology appraisal -June 2008. National Institute for Health & Clinical Excellence 2009. Available at: http://www.nice.org.uk/media/B52/ A7/TAMethodsGuideUpdatedJune2008. pdf (22 April 2009, date last accessed).
31. Schmittdiel J. Predicted quality-adjusted life years as a composite measure of the clinical value of diabetes risk factor control. Med Care 2007;45:315.
32. Association of Public Health Observatories, 2010. Available at: http://www.lho.org.uk/ LHO-Topics/Analytic-Tools/ HealthInequalitiesInterventionToolkit.aspx (16 July 2010, date last accessed).