Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process approach for ranking the sawability of carbonate rock

International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences

Volumn 50, Issue , 2012, Pages 83-93

  Ataei, Mohammad ^a   Mikaeil, Reza ^a   Hoseinie, Seyed Hadi ^a   Hosseini, Seyed Mehdi ^b  

^a SHAHROOD UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

^b ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Classification; Energy consumption; FAHP; Multi criteria decision making; Sawability

Indexed keywords

CARBONATES; CARBONATION; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DECISION MAKING; ELASTIC MODULI; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SAWING; SEDIMENTARY ROCKS;

ABRASIVITY; CARBONATE ROCK; CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; FAHP; FUZZY ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; MULTI CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING; MULTICRITERION DECISION MAKINGS; SAWABILITY;

ENERGY UTILIZATION;

CARBONATE ROCK; CLASSIFICATION; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; HARDNESS; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEM; NUMERICAL MODEL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; YOUNG MODULUS;

EID: 84857644125     PISSN: 13651609     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2011.12.002     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Burgess RB. Circular sawing granite with diamond saw blades. In: Proceedings of the fifth industrial diamond seminar, 1978: p. 3-10.
2. Wright D.N., Cassapi V.B. Factors influencing stone sawability. Indust Diamond Rev 1985, 2:84-87.
3. Birle J.D., Ratterman E. An approximate ranking of the sawability of hard building stones based on laboratory tests. Dimensional Stone Mag 1986, 3:3-29.
4. Jennings M., Wright D.N. Guidelines for sawing stone. Indust Diamond Rev 1989, 49:70-75.
5. Clausen R., Wang C.Y., Meding M. Characteristics of acoustic emission during single diamond scratching of granite. Indust Diamond Rev 1996, 3:96-99.
6. Wei X., Wang C.Y., Zhou Z.H. Study on the fuzzy ranking of granite sawability. J Mater Proc Tech 2003, 139:277-280.
7. Eyuboglu A.S., Ozcelik Y., Kulaksiz S., Engin I.C. Statistical and microscopic investigation of disc segment wear related to sawing Ankara andésites. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 2003, 40:405-414.
8. Ersoy A., Atici U. Performance characteristics of circular diamond saws in cutting different types of rocks. Diamond Related Mater. 2004, 13:22-37.
9. Kahraman S., Fener M., Gunaydin O. Predicting the sawability of carbonate rocks using multiple curvilinear regression analysis. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 2004, 41:1123-1131.
10. Gunaydin O., Kahraman S., Fener M. Sawability prediction of carbonate rocks from brittleness indexes. J South Afr Inst Min Metall 2004, 104:239-244.
11. Özçelik Y., Polat E., Bayram F., Ay A.M. Investigation of the effects of textural properties on marble cutting with diamond wire. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 2004, 41(3):1-7.
12. Buyuksagis I.S., Goktan R.M. Investigation of marble machining performance using an instrumented block-cutter. J Mater Proc Tech 2005, 169(2):258-262.
13. Ersoy A., Buyuksagis S., Atici U. Wear characteristics of circular diamond saws in the cutting of different hard and abrasive rocks. Wear 2005, 258:1422-1436.
14. Delgado N.S., Rodriguez R., Rio A., Sarria I.D., Calleja L., Argandona V.G.R. The influence of microhardness on the sawability of Pink Porrino granite (Spain). Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 2005, 42(1):161-166.
15. Kahraman S., Altun H., Tezekici B.S., Fener M. Sawability prediction of carbonate rocks from shear strength parameters using artificial neural networks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 2005, 43(1):157-164.
16. Fener M., Kahraman S., Ozder M.O. Performance prediction of circular diamond saws from mechanical rock properties in cutting carbonate rocks. Rock Mech Rock Eng 2007, 40(5):505-517.
17. Kahraman S., Ulker U., Delibalta S. A quality classification of building stones from P-wave velocity and its application to stone cutting with gang saws. J South Afr Inst Min Metall 2007, 107:427-430.
18. Özçelik Y. The effect of marble textural characteristics on the sawing efficiency of diamond segmented frame saws. Ind Diamond Rev 2007, 67(2):65-70.
19. Tutmez B., Kahraman S., Gunaydin O. Multifactorial fuzzy approach to the sawability classification of building stones. Construct Build Mater 2007, 21:1672-1679.
20. Buyuksagis I.S. Effect of cutting mode on the sawability of granites using segmented circular diamond saw blade. J Mater Proc Tech 2007, 183(2-3):399-406.
21. Mikaeil R., Ataei M., Hoseinie S.H. Predicting the production rate of diamond wire saws in carbonate rocks cutting. Ind Diamond Rev 2008, 3:28-34.
22. Atici U., Ersoy A. Correlation of specific energy of cutting saws and drilling bits with rock brittleness and destruction energy. J Mater Proc Tech 2009, 209(5):2602-2612.
23. Ataei M, Mikaiel R, Sereshki F, Ghaysari N. Predicting the production rate of diamondwire saw using statistical analysis. Arab J Geosci, In press. http://10.1007/s12517-010-0278-z.
24. Mikaeil R., Yousefi R., Ataei M., Abasian Farani R. Development of a new classification system for assessing of carbonate rock sawability. Arch Min Sci 2011, 56(1):57-68.
25. Zadeh L.A. Fuzzy sets. Inform Control 1965, 8:338-353.
26. Tsaur S.H., Chang T.Y., Yen C.H. The evaluation of airline service quality by fuzzy MCDM. Tourism Manag 2002, 23(2):107-115.
27. Ertugrul I., Tus A. Interactive fuzzy linear programming and an application sample at a textile firm. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 2007, 6:29-49.
28. Bojadziev G., Bojadziev M. Fuzzy sets fuzzy logic applications 1998, World Sci Pub, Singapore.
29. Lai Y.J., Hwang C.L. Fuzzy multiple objective decision making 1996, Springer, Berlin.
30. Kahraman C. Capital budgeting techniques using discounted fuzzy cash flows. Soft computing for risk evaluation and management: applications in technology, environment and finance 2001, 375-396. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg. D. Ruan, J. Kacprzyk, M. Fedrizzi (Eds.).
31. Kahraman C., Ruan D., Tolga E. Capital budgeting techniques using discounted fuzzy versus probabilistic cash flows. Inform Sci 2002, 42(1-4):57-76.
32. Saaty T.L. The analytic hierarchy process 1980, McGraw-Hill, New York.
33. Zare Naghadehi M., Mikaeil R., Ataei M. The application of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) approach to election of optimum underground mining method for Jajarm Bauxite Mine, Iran. Expert Syst Appl 2009, 36:8218-8226.
34. Mikaeil R, Zare Naghadehi M., Ataei, Khalo Kakaie R. A decision support system using Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and TOPSIS approaches for selection of the optimum underground mining method. Arch Min Sci 2009, 54(2):341-368.
35. Saaty T.L., Vargas L.G. The Analytic Hierarchy Process Series 1990, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh.
36. Kahraman C., Ruan D., Dogan I. Fuzzy group decision making for facility location selection. Inform Sci 2003, 157:135-153.
37. Wang T.C., Chen Y.H. Applying consistent fuzzy preference relations to partnership selection. Int J Manag Sci 2007, 35:384-388.
38. Deng H. Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pair-wise comparison. Int J Approx Reasoning 1999, 21:215-231.
39. Kahraman C., Cebeci U., Ulukan Z. Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP. Logistics Inf Manag 2003, 16(6):382-394.
40. Van Laarhoven P.J.M., Pedrcyz W. A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1983, 11:229-241.
41. Buckley J.J. Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1985, 17:233-247.
42. Chang D.Y. Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. Eur J Oper Res 1996, 95:649-655.
43. Zhu K., Jing Y., Chang D. A discussion on extent analysis method and applications of fuzzy AHP. Eur J Oper Res 1999, 116:450-456.
44. Leung L., Cao D. Theory and methodology in consistency and ranking of alternatives in fuzzy AHP. Eur J Oper Res 2000, 124:102-113.
45. Chou T.Y., Liang G.S. Application of a fuzzy multi-criteria decision making model for shipping company performance evaluation. Maritime Policy Manag 2001, 28(4):375-392.
46. Bozdag C.E., Kahraman C., Ruan D. Fuzzy group decision making for selection among computer integrated manufacturing systems. Comput Ind 2003, 51:13-29.
47. Chang YH, Cheng CH, Wang TC. Performance evaluation of international airports in the region of east Asia. In: Proc of Eastern Asia society for transportation studies 2003, vol. 4, p. 213-30.
48. Kahraman C. Capital budgeting techniques using discounted fuzzy cash flows. Soft computing for risk evaluation and management: applications in technology, environment and finance 2001, 375-396. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg. D. Ruan, J. Kacprzyk, M. Fedrizzi (Eds.).
49. Hsieh T.Y., Lu S.T., Tzeng G.H. Fuzzy MCDM approach for planning and design tenders selection in public office buildings. Int J Proj Manag 2004, 22:573-584.
50. Mikhailov L., Tsvetinov P. Evaluation of services using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Appl Soft Comput 2004, 5:23-33.
51. Enea M., Piazza T. Project selection by constrained fuzzy AHP. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 2004, 3:39-62.
52. Kahraman C., Cebeci U., Ruan D. Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using fuzzy AHP: the case of Turkey. Int J Prod Econ 2004, 87:171-184.
53. Tang Y., Beynon M.J. Application and development of a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process within a capital investment study. J Econ Manag 2005, 1(2):207-230.
54. Tolga E., Demircan M., Kahraman C. Operating system selection using fuzzy replacement analysis and analytic hierarchy process. Int J Prod Econ 2005, 97:89-117.
55. Ataei M. Multi-criteria selection for alumina-cement plant location in East-Azerbaijan province of Iran. J South Afr Inst Min Metall 2005, 105(7):507-514.
56. Basligil H. The fuzzy analytic hierarchy process for software selection problems. J Eng Nat Sci 2005, 2:24-33.
57. Tang L.L., Kuo Y.C., Lee E.S. A multi-objective model for Taiwan notebook computer distribution problem. Global integrated supply chain systems 2005, 171. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, Penn. Y.C. Lan (Ed.).
58. Gu X., Zhu Q. Fuzzy multi-attribute decision making method based on eigenvector of fuzzy attribute evaluation space. Decision Support Syst 2006, 41:400-410.
59. Tuysuz F., Kahraman C. Project risk evaluation using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: an application to information technology projects. Int J Intell Syst 2006, 21:229-284.
60. Ayag Z., Ozdemir R.G. A fuzzy AHP approach to evaluating machine tool alternatives. J Intell Manufact 2006, 17:179-190.
61. Ertugrul I, Karakasoglu N. The fuzzy analytic hierarchy process for supplier selection and an application in a textile company. In: Proceedings of 5th international symposium on intelligent manufacturing systems, 2006, p. 195-207.
62. Haq A.N., Kannan G. Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process for evaluating and selecting a vendor in a supply chain model. Int J Adv Manufact 2006, 29:826-835.
63. Chan F.T.S., Kumar N. Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach. Int J Manag Sci 2007, 35:417-431.
64. Ertugrul I, Karakasoglu N. Performance evaluation of Turkish cement firms with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS methods. Expert Syst Appl 2008.
65. Mikaeil R., Zare Naghadehi M., Sereshki F. Multifactorial fuzzy approach to the penetrability classification of TBM in hard rock conditions. Tunnell Undergr Space Tech 2009, 24:500-505.
66. Mikaeil R., Zare Naghadehi M., Ataei M., KhaloKakaie R. A decision support system using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP) and TOPSIS approaches for selection of the optimum underground mining method. Archiv Min Sci 2009, 54:341-368.
67. Chen C.T., Lin C.T., Huang S.F. A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management. Int J Prod Econ 2006, 102:289-301.
68. Bieniawski Z.T. Engineering rock mass classifications 1989, Wiley, New York.
69. Hoseinie S.H., Ataei M., Osanloo M. A new classification system for evaluating rock penetrability. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 2009, 46:1329-1340.
70. Ersoy A., Waller M.D. Textural characterization of rocks. J Eng Geol 1995, 39(3- 4):123-136.
71. International Society for Rock Mechanics Rock characterisation, testing and monitoring: ISRM suggested methods 1981, Pergamon, Oxford.