Diversity and Effectiveness of Insect Pollinators of Jatropha curcas L. (Euphorbiaceae)

HAYATI Journal of Biosciences

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 38-42

  RIANTI, P U J I ^a   SURYOBROTO, BAMBANG ^a   ATMOWIDI, T R I ^a  

^a BOGOR AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (Indonesia)

Author keywords

diversity; fruit set; Jatropha curcas L.; pollinator insects; visiting frequencies

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857632904     PISSN: 19783019     EISSN: 20864094     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4308/hjb.17.1.38     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Atmowidi, T, Buchori, D, Manuwoto, S, Suryobroto, B, Hidayat, P, Diversity of pollinator insects in relation of seed set of Mustard (Brassica rapa L.: Cruciferae). HAYATI J Biosci 14 (2007), 155–161.
2. Atmowidi, T, Rianti, P, Sutrisna, A, Pollination effectiveness of Apis cerana Fabricus and Apis mellifera Linnaeus in Jatropha curcas L. (Euphorbiaceae). Biotropia 15 (2008), 129–134.
3. Banjo, AD, Lawal, OA, Aina, SA, The entomofauna of two medicinal Euphorbiaceae in Southwestern Nigeria. J Appl Sci Res 2 (2006), 858–863.
4. Barth, FG, Insects and Flowers. The Biology of a Partnership, 1991, Princeton Univ. Pr., New Jersey.
5. Bhattacharya, A, Datta, K, Datta, SK, Floral biology, floral resource constraints and pollination limitation in Jatropha curcas L. Pak J Sci 8 (2005), 456–460.
6. Cuautle, M, Rico-Gray, V, The effect of wasps and ants on the reproductive success of the extrafloral nectaried plant Turnera ulmifolia (Turneraceae). Functional Ecol 17 (2003), 417–423.
7. Dafni, A, Pollination Ecology: A Practical Approach, 1992, Oxford Univ Pr, New York.
8. Faheem, M, Aslam, M, Razaq, M, Pollination ecology with special reference to insects a review. J Res Sci 4 (2004), 395–409.
9. Hardwicke, K, Implications for angiosperm-insect coevolution: differential thermoregulation abilities of pollinators de to behavior and morphology (Coleoptera, Diptera, Hymenoptera, and Lepidoptera) affect distribution, community composition, and floral visitation behavior in a range of environments. Insect Behav 507 (2003), 1–12.
10. Kremen, C, William, MN, Thorp, RW, Crop pollination from native bees at risk from agricultural intensification. PNAS 99 (2002), 16812–16819.
11. nd ed., 1993, Cambridge Univ. Pr., United Kingdom.
12. Michener, CD, The Bees of the World, 2000, John Hopkins Univ. Pr.
13. Mohr, H, Schopfer, P, Lawlor, G, Plant Physiology, 1995, Springer-verlag, Berlin.
14. Momose, K, Yumoto, T, Nagamitsu, T, Kato, M, Nagamasu, H, Sakai, S, Harrison, RD, Itioka, T, Hamid, AA, Inoue, T, Pollination biology on a dipterocarp forest in Sarawak Malaysia: characteristic of the plant pollinator community in the lowland dipterocarp forest. Am J Bot 85 (1998), 1477–1501.
15. Neupane, KR, Dhakal, DD, Thapa, RB, Gautam, DM, Foraging preference of giant honeybee, Apis dorsata F, to selected horticultural crops. J Inst Agric Anim Sci 27 (2006), 87–92.
16. Nuryani, Y, Pemanfaatan jarak pagar sebagai obat. Infotek Jarak Pagar, 2, 2007, 33.
17. Raju, AJS, Ezradanam, V, Pollination ecology and fruiting behavior in a monoecious species, Jathropha curcas L. (Euphorbiaceae). Cur Sci 83 (2002), 1395–1398.
18. Steffan-Dewanter, I, Muzenberg, U, Burger, C, Thies, C, Tscharntke, T, Scale-dependent effects of landscape context on three pollinator guilds. Ecology 83 (2002), 1421–1432.
19. Stout, JC, Parnell, JAN, Arroyo, J, Crowe, TP, Pollination ecology and seed production of Rhododendron ponticum in native and exotic habitats. Biodiver Conserv 15 (2006), 755–777.