Telemedicine security: A systematic review

Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 768-777

  Garg, Vaibhav ^a   Brewer, Jeffrey ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Diabetes; Privacy; Safety; Security; Telecare; Telemedicine

Indexed keywords

ALZHEIMER DISEASE; COMPUTER SECURITY; DIABETIC PATIENT; EUROPE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; POPULATION SIZE; PRIVACY; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TELEMEDICINE; UNITED STATES; ACCESS TO INFORMATION; COMPUTER; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONFIDENTIALITY; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; INTERNET; LEGAL ASPECT; METHODOLOGY; TIME;

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; COMPUTERS; CONFIDENTIALITY; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HUMANS; INTERNET; RESEARCH DESIGN; SOFTWARE; TELEMEDICINE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84857630101     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19322968     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/193229681100500331     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Huang ES, Basu A, O'Grady M, Capretta JC. Projecting the future diabetes population size and related costs for the US. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(12):2225-9.
2. Hogan P, Dall T, Nikolov P; American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the US in 2002. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(3):917-32.
3. Berg M. Patient care information systems and health care work: a sociotechnical approach. Int J Med Inform. 1999;55(2):87-101. (Pubitemid 29413153)
4. Tanriverdi H, Iacono CS. Diffusion of telemedicine: a knowledge barrier perspective. Telemed J. 1999;5(3):223-44. (Pubitemid 30012298)
5. Whitten P, Johannessen LK, Soerensen T, Gammon D, Mackert M. A systematic review of research methodology in telemedicine studies. J Telemed Telecare. 2007;13(5):230-5.
6. Whetton S. Success and failures: what are we measuring? J Telemed Telecare. 2005;11 Suppl 2:S98-100.
7. Broens TH, Huis in't Veld RM, Vollenbroek-Hutten MM, Hermens HJ, van Halteren AT, Nieuwenhuis LJ. Determinants of successful telemedicine implementations: a literature study. J Telemed Telecare. 2007;13(6):303-9.
8. Stell A, Sinnott R, Ajayi O. Secure federated data retrieval in clinical trials. In: Proceedings of the 2nd IASTED International Conference on Telehealth. Anaheim: ACTA; 2006.
9. Fischhoff B, Slovic P, Lichtenstein S, Read S, Combs B. How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sci. 1978;9(2):127-52.
10. Savastano M, Hovsto A, Pharow P, Blobel B. Identity-management factors in e-health and telemedicine applications. J Telemed Telecare. 2008;14(7):386-8.
11. Huston JL. Telemedical record documentation: a preliminary survey. J Telemed Telecare. 1999;5 Suppl 1:S6-8.
12. Huston JL. Information governance standards for managing e-health information. J Telemed Telecare. 2005;11 Suppl 2:S56-8.
13. Traynor P. Privacy and security concerns for personal and mobile health devices. In: Proceedings of the Workshop to Set A Research Agenda for Privacy and Security of Healthcare Technologies. 2009, 34-48.
14. Lee T, Mihailidis A. An intelligent emergency response system: preliminary development and testing of automated fall detection. J Telemed Telecare. 2005;11(4):194-8. (Pubitemid 40848126)
15. Whitehouse P, Marling C, Harvey R. Can a computer be a caregiver? In: Proceedings of the AAAI-02 Workshop: Automation as Caregiver. Menlo Park: AAAI Press; 2002, 103-7.
16. Czaja SJ, Charness N, Fisk AD, Hertzog C, Nair SN, Rogers WA, Sharit J. Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). Psychol Aging. 2006;21(2):333-52. (Pubitemid 44212031)
17. Mitnick K, Simon W. The art of deception: controlling the human element of security. New York: Jon Wiley & Sons; 2003.
18. Stanberry B. The legal and ethical aspects of telemedicine. 2: Data protection, security and European law. J Telemed Telecare. 1998;4(1):18-24.
19. Wallace S, Sibson L, Stanberry B, Waters D, Goodall P, Jones R, Evans J, Dunn R. The legal and risk management conundrum of telemedicine. J Telemed Telecare. 1999;5 Suppl 1:S8-9.
20. Yellowlees PW, Harry D. Standards for data collection and monitoring in a telemedicine research network. J Telemed Telecare. 2006;12 Suppl 2:S72-6.
21. Alexander M. Telemedicine in Australia. 2: The Health Communication Network. J Telemed Telecare. 1996;2(1):1-6. (Pubitemid 126700947)
22. Makris L, Argiriou N, Strintzis MG. Network access and data security design for telemedicine applications. Presented at: 2nd IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications, 1997.
23. Needham RM, Schroeder MD. Using encryption for authentication in large networks of computers. Comm ACM. 1978;21(12):993-9.
24. Lowe G. An attack on the Needham-Schroeder Public Key Authentication Protocol. Inform Process Lett. 1995;56(3):131-6.
25. Collmann J, Coleman J, Sostrom K, Wright W. Organizing safety: conditions for successful information assurance programs. Telemed J E Health. 2004;10(3):311-20. (Pubitemid 39315102)
26. Koch S. Meeting the challenges - the role of medical informatics in an ageing society. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006;124:25-31.
27. Ferrante FE. Evolving telemedicine/ehealth technology. Telemed J E Health. 2005;11(3):370-83. (Pubitemid 41078821)
28. Whitten P, Adams I. Success and failure: a case study of two rural telemedicine projects. J Telemed Telecare. 2003;9(3):125-9. (Pubitemid 40021943)