The involvement of bottom-up saliency processing in endogenous inhibition of return

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 74, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 285-299

  Henderickx, David ^a   Maetens, Kathleen ^a   Soetens, Eric ^a  

^a VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Attention: Selective; Inhibition of return

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; REACTION TIME;

ADOLESCENT; ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; CUES; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84857616985     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: 1943393X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-011-0234-3     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Balan, P. F., & Gottlieb, J. (2006). Integration of exogenous input into a dynamic salience map revealed by perturbing attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 9239-9249.
2. Bisley, J. W., & Goldberg, M. E. (2003). Neuronal activity in the lateral intraparietal area and spatial attention. Science, 299, 81-86.
3. Briand, K. A. (1998). Feature integration and spatial attention: More evidence of a dissociation between endogenous and exogenous orienting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1243-1256.
4. Briand, K. A., & Klein, R. M. (1987). Is Posner's "beam" the same as Treisman's "glue"? On the relation between visual orienting and feature integration theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 228-241.
5. Castel, A. D., Pratt, J., Chasteen, A. L., & Scialfa, C. T. (2005). Examining task difficulty and the time course of inhibition of return: Detecting perceptually degraded targets. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 90-98.
6. Cave, K. R., & Wolfe, J. M. (1990). Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 225-271.
7. Chica, A. B., Klein, R. M., Rafal, R. D., & Hopfinger, J. B. (2010). Endogenous saccade preparation does not produce inhibition of return: Failure to replicate Rafal, Calabresi, Brennan, & Sciolto (1989). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1193-1206.
8. Clark, J. J. (1999). Spatial attention and latencies of saccadic eye movements. Vision Research, 39, 585-602.
9. Danziger, S., Ward, R., Owen, V., & Rafal, R. (2002). The effects of unilateral pulvinar damage in humans on reflexive orienting and filtering of irrelevant information. Behavioral Neurology, 13, 95-104.
10. Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193-222.
11. Dorris, M. C., Klein, R. M., Everling, S., & Munoz, D. P. (2002). Contribution of the primate superior colliculus to inhibition of return. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 1256-1263.
12. Findlay, J. M. (2009). Saccadic eye movement programming: Sensory and attentional factors. Psychological Research, 73, 127-135.
13. Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. W. (1998). Selectivity in attentional capture by featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 847-858.
14. Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. W. (1999). Can new objects override attentional control settings? Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 727-739.
15. Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. W. (2006). Top-down modulation of preattentive processing: Testing the recovery account of contingent capture. Visual Cognition, 14, 445-465.
16. Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030-1044.
17. Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Wright, J. H. (1994). The structure of attentional control: Contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and colour. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 317-329.
18. Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
19. Godijn, R., & Theeuwes, J. (2004). The relationship between inhibition of return and saccade trajectory deviations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 538-554.
20. Gottlieb, J., & Goldberg, M. E. (1999). Activity of neurons in the lateral intraparietal area of the monkey during an antisaccade task. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 906-912.
21. Gottlieb, J., Kusunoki, M., & Goldberg, M. E. (1998). The representation of visual salience in monkey parietal cortex. Nature, 391, 481-484.
22. Henderickx, D., Maetens, K., Geerinck, T., & Soetens, E. (2009). Modeling the interactions of bottom-up and top-down guidance in visual attention. In L. Paletta & J. K. Tsotsos (Eds.), Attention in cognitive systems (pp. 197-211). Berlin: Springer.
23. Henderickx, D., Maetens, K., & Soetens, E. (2010). Feature integration and spatial attention: Common processes for endogenous and exogenous orienting. Psychological Research, 74, 239-254.
24. Henderickx, D., Maetens, K., & Soetens, E. (2011). Strategic modulation of inhibition of return: The effect of temporal target onset predictability in detection and discrimination tasks. Manuscript submitted for publication.
25. Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2000). Saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Visual Research, 40, 1489-1506.
26. Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2001). Computational modeling of visual attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 194-203.
27. Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary vs. automatic control over the mind's eye's movement. In J. B. Long & A. D. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 187-203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Jonides, J., & Irwin, D. E. (1981). Capturing attention. Cognition, 10, 145-150.
29. Jonides, J., & Yantis, S. (1988). Uniqueness of abrupt stimulus onset in capturing attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 43, 346-354.
30. Kingstone, A., & Pratt, J. (1999). Inhibition of return is composed of attentional and oculomotor processes. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1046-1054.
31. Klein, R. M. (1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search. Nature, 334, 430-431.
32. Klein, R. M., & MacInnes, W. J. (1999). Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science, 10, 346-352.
33. Koch, C., & Ullman, S. (1985). Shifts in selective visual attention: Towards the underlying neural circuitry. Human Neurobiology, 4, 219-227.
34. Los, S. A. (2004). Inhibition of return and nonspecific preparation: Separable inhibitory control mechanisms in space and time. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 119-130.
35. Lupiáñez, J., Decaix, C., Siéroff, E., Chokron, S., Milliken, B., & Bartolomeo, P. (2004). Independent effects of endogenous and exogenous spatial cueing: Inhibition of return at endogenous attended target locations. Experimental Brain Research, 159, 447-457.
36. Mayer, A. R., Seidenberg, M., Dorflinger, J. M., & Rao, S. M. (2004). An event-related fMRI study of exogenous orienting: Supporting evidence for the cortical basis of inhibition of return? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1262-1271.
37. Müller, H. J., & Findlay, J. M. (1988). The effect of visual attention on peripheral discrimination thresholds in single and multiple element displays. Acta Psychologica, 69, 129-155.
38. Müller, H. J., & Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 315-330.
39. Müller, H. J., & von Mühlenen, A. (2000). Probing distractor inhibition in visual search: Inhibition of return. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1591-1605.
40. Navalpakkam, V., & Itti, L. (2005). Modeling the influence of task on attention. Vision Research, 45, 205-231.
41. Olivers, C. N. L., Meijer, F., & Theeuwes, J. (2006). Feature-based memory-driven capture: Visual working memory content affects visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1243-1265.
42. Palmer, S. (1999). Vision science: Photons to phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
44. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 55-66). Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.
45. Posner, M. I., Rafal, R. D., Choate, L., & Vaughan, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 211-228.
46. Rafal, R. D., Calabresi, P. A., Brennan, C. W., & Sciolto, T. K. (1989). Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 673-685.
47. Rafal, R. D., & Henik, A. (1994). The neurology of inhibition: integrating controlled and automatic processes. In D. E. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 1-51). San Diego, CA: Academic.
48. Remington, R. W., Johnston, J. C., & Yantis, S. (1992). Involuntary attentional capture by abrupt onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 279-290.
49. Sala, J. B., & Courtney, S. M. (2009). Flexible working memory representation of the relationship between an object and its location as revealed by interactions with attention. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 1525-1533.
50. Sapir, A., Hayes, A., Henik, A., Danziger, S., & Rafal, R. (2004). Parietal lobe lesions disrupt saccadic remapping of inhibitory location tagging. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1-7.
51. Sapir, A., Soroker, N., Berger, A., & Henik, A. (1999). Inhibition of return in spatial attention: Direct evidence for collicular generation. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 1053-1054.
52. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). Prime user's guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
53. Shipp, S. (2004). The brain circuitry of attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 223-230.
54. Soto, D., Heinke, D., Humphreys, G. W., & Blanco, M. J. (2005). Early, involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 248-261.
55. Sparks, D. L., & Hartwitch-Young, R. (1989). The deep layers of the superior colliculus. In R. H. Wurtz & M. E. Goldberd (Eds.), The neurobiology of saccadic eye movements (pp. 213-255). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
56. Taylor, T. L. (2007). Inhibition of return for expected and unexpected targets. Acta Psychologica, 124, 257-273.
57. Taylor, T. L., & Klein, R. M. (1998). On the cause and effects of inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 625-643.
58. Theeuwes, J., & Godijn, R. (2004). Inhibition of return and oculomotor interference. Vision Research, 44, 1485-1492.
59. Theeuwes, J., van der Sigchel, S., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2006). Spatial working memory and inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 608-613.
60. Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
61. Vivas, A. B., Humphreys, G. W., & Fuentes, L. J. (2003). Inhibitory processing following damage to the parietal lobe. Neuropsychologia, 41, 1531-1540.
62. Vivas, A. B., Humphreys, G. W., & Fuentes, L. J. (2006). Abnormal inhibition of return: A review and new data on patients with parietal lobe damage. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23, 1049-1064.
63. Vivas, A. B., Humphreys, G. W., & Fuentes, L. J. (2008). Object-based inhibition of return in patients with parietal lobe damage. Neuropsychology, 22, 169-176.
64. Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2. 0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202-238.
65. Wolfe, J. M. (2007). Guided Search 4. 0: Current progress with a model of visual search. In W. Gray (Ed.), Integrated models of cognitive systems (pp. 99-119). New York: Oxford University Press.
66. Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2007). Do the contents of visual working memory automatically influence attentional selection during visual search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 363-377.
67. Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from selective search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 601-621.