An evaluation of the multi-engine MT architecture

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1529, Issue , 1998, Pages 113-123

  Hogan, Christopher ^a   Frederking, Robert E ^a  

^a Carnegie Mellon University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; COMPUTER AIDED LANGUAGE TRANSLATION; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

BLIND EVALUATIONS; CROATIANS; PERCEIVED BENEFITS; RESEARCH SYSTEM; SPEECH TRANSLATION; STATISTICAL LANGUAGE MODELING; TARGET LANGUAGE;

ENGINES;

EID: 84857598349     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-49478-2_11     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. J. J. Bartko and W. T. Carpenter. 1976. On the Methods and Theory of Reliability. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 163(5):307-317.
2. I. N. Bronstein and K. A. Semendyayev. 1985. Handbook of Mathematics. Verlag Harri Deutsch, Thun and Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt/Main, third edition.
3. Ralf Brown and Robert Frederking. 1995. Applying Statistical English Language Modeling to Symbolic Machine Translation. In Proceedings ofthe Sixth International Conference on Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Machine Translation (TMI-95), pages 221-239.
4. Ralf Brown. 1996. Example-based Machine Translation in the Pangloss System. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-96).
5. David Carter et al. 1997. Translation Methodology in the Spoken Language Translator: An Evaluation. In Steven Krauwer et al., editors, Spoken Language Translation: Proceedings of a Workshop, pages 73-81, Madrid, Spain, July. Association of Computational Linguistics and European Network in Language and Speech.
6. G. Dunn. 1989. Design and Analysis of Reliability Studies: The Statistical Evaluation of Measurement Errors. Oxford University Press, New York.
7. David Farwell and Yorick Wilks. 1991. Ultra: A Multi-Lingual Machine Translator. In Proceedings of Machine Translation Summit III, Washington D. C., July.
8. Robert Frederking and Ralf Brown. 1996. The Pangloss-Lite Machine Translation System. In Proceedings of the Second Conference of the Association for Machine Translation in the Americas (AMTA), pages 268-272, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, October.
9. Robert Frederking and Sergei Nirenburg. 1994. Three Heads are Better than One. In Proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing (ANLP-94), Stuttgart, Germany.
10. Robert Frederking et al. 1993. An MAT Tool and its Effectiveness. In Proceedings of the DARPA Human Language Technology Workshop, Princeton, New Jersey.
11. Robert Frederking et al. 1994. Integrating Translations from Multiple Sources with the Pangloss Mark III Machine Translation System. In Proceedings ofthe First Conference for Machine Translation in the Americas (AMTA), Columbia, Maryland, October.
12. Robert Frederking, Alexander Rudnicky, and Christopher Hogan. 1997. Interactive Speech Translation in the DIPLOMAT Project. In Steven Krauwer et al., editors, Spoken Language Translation: Proceedings ofa Workshop, pages 61-66, Madrid, Spain, July. Association of Computational Linguistics and European Network in Language and Speech.
13. Robert Frederking. 1994. Statistical Language Models for Symbolic MT. In Language Engineering on the Information Highway Workshop, Santorini, Greece, September.
14. Donna Gates et al. 1996. End-to-End Evaluation in Janus: A Speech-to-Speech Translation System. In Elisabeth Maier et al., editors, Dialogue Processing in Spoken Language Systems, volume 1236 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 195206. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
15. Juliane House. 1981. A Model for Translation Quality Assessment. Gunter Narr Verlag.
16. Martin Kay. 1967. Experiments with a Powerful Parser. In Proceedings of the 2nd International COLING, August.
17. K. Krippendorf. 1970. Bivariate Agreement Coefficients for Reliability of Data. In E. F. Borgatta and G. W. Bohrnstedt, editors, Sociological Methodology. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
18. R. J. Light. 1971. Measures of Response Agreement for Qualitative Data: Some Generalizations and Alternatives. Psychological Bulletin, 76:365-377.
19. R. R. MacDonald. 1963. General Report 1952-1963. Number 30 in Georgetown University Occasional Papers in Machine Translation. Washington, D. C.
20. A. K. Melby. 1983. Computer-Assisted Translation Systems: The Standard Design and a Multi-Level Design. In Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, Santa Monica, California, February.
21. Teruko Mitamura, Eric Nyberg, and Jaime Carbonell. 1991. Interlingua Translation System for Multi-Lingual Document Processing. In Proceedings of Machine Translation Summit III, Washington, D. C., July.
22. M. Nagao. 1984. A Framework of a Mechanical Translation between Japanese and English by Analogy Principle. In A. Elithorn and R. Banerji, editors, Artificial and Human Intelligence. NATO Publications.
23. Sergei Nirenburg et al. 1995. The Pangloss Mark III Machine Translation System. Technical Report Issued as CMU Technical Report CMU-CMT-95-145, Joint Technical Report, Computing Research Laboratory (New Mexico State University), Center for Machine Translation (Carnegie Mellon University), Information Sciences Institute (University of Southern California).
24. Sergei Nirenburg et al. 1996. Two Principles and Six Techniques for Rapid MT Development. In Proceedings ofthe Second Conference ofthe Association for Machine Translation in the Americas, pages 96-105, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, October.
25. William H. Press, Brian P. Flannery, Saul A. Teukolsky, and William T. Vetterling. 1986. Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
26. Manny Rayner and David Carter. 1997. Hybrid Processing in the Spoken Language Translator. In Proceedings of ICASSP-97, Munich, Germany.
27. S. Sato and M. Nagao. 1990. Towards Memory Based Translation. In Proceedings of COLING-90, Helsinki, Finland.
28. J. S. White and T. A. O'Connell. 1994. The ARPA MT Evaluation Methodologies: Evolution, Lessons, and Future Approaches. In Proceedings of the First Conference of the Association for Machine Translation in the Americas (AMTA).
29. Terry Winograd. 1983. Language as a Cognitive Process. Volume 1: Syntax. Addison-Wesley.