Learning-based evaluation of visual analytic systems

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 29-34

  Chang, Remco ^a   Ziemkiewicz, Caroline ^a   Pyzh, Roman ^a   Kielman, Joseph ^b   Ribarsky, William ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

^b Dept of Homeland Security ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Evaluation methodology; Learning; Visualization

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL PROCESS; DATA SETS; EVALUATION METHODOLOGIES; LEARNING; SYSTEM-BASED; VISUAL ANALYTICS;

ERRORS; FLOW VISUALIZATION; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

VISUALIZATION;

EID: 84857592406     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2110192.2110197     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Chen, M., Ebert, D., Hagen, H., Laramee, R. S., van Liere, R., Ma, K., Ribarsky, W., Scheuermann, G., and Silver, D. 2009. Data, Information, and Knowledge in Visualization. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 29, 1 (Jan. 2009), 12-19.
2. Chang, R., Ziemkiewicz, C., Green T. M., and Ribarsky, W. 2009. Defining insight for visual analytics. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 29(2):14-17.
3. Dou, W., Jeong, D.H., Stukes, F., Ribarsky, W., Richter Lipford, H., Chang, R. 2009. Recovering Reasoning Processes from User Interactions. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 52-61.
4. Hilbert, D. M. and Redmiles, D. F. 2000. Extracting usability information from user interface events. ACM Comput. Surv. 32, 4 (Dec. 2000), 384-421.
5. Isenberg, P., Zuk, T., Collins, C., and Carpendale, S. 2008. Grounded evaluation of information visualization. In Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods For Information Visualization (Florence, Italy, April 05, 2008). BELIV '08. ACM, New York, NY.
6. McCormick, B. H., DeFanti, T. A., and Brown, M. D. (eds). 1987. Visualization in Scientific Computing. ACM SIGGRAPH, New York, NY.
7. North, C. 2006. Toward measuring visualization insight. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 26(3):6-9. (Pubitemid 46404978)
8. Perer, P., and Shneiderman, B. Integrating Statistics and Visualization: Case Studies of Gaining Clarity During Exploratory Data Analysis. ACM Conference on HumanFactors in Computing Systems (CHI 2008). Florence, Italy. (2008).
9. Robertson, G. 2008. Beyond time and errors - position statement. In Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods For Information Visualization (Florence, Italy, April 05, 2008). BELIV '08. ACM, New York, NY.
10. Saraiya, P., North, C., and Duca, K. 2005. An insight-based methodology for evaluating bioinformatics visualizations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 11(4):443-456. (Pubitemid 41049906)
11. Scholtz, J. 2008. Progress and Challenges in Evaluating Tools for Sensemaking. ACM Computer Human Information (CHI) conference Workshop on Sensemaking in Florence, Italy, April 6, 2008.
12. Shneiderman, B. and Plaisant, C. 2006. Strategies for evaluating information visualization tools: multi-dimensional in-depth long-term case studies. In Proceedings of the 2006 AVI Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods For Information Visualization (Venice, Italy, May 23, 2006). BELIV '06. ACM, New York, NY.
13. Thomas, J. J. and Cook, K. A. (eds). 2005. Illuminating the Path: Research and Development Agenda for Visual Analytics. IEEE.
14. van Wijk, J. J. 2005. The value of visualization. Visualization. VIS 05. IEEE, 79-86.