On the volume conservation of the immersed boundary method

Communications in Computational Physics

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 401-432

  Griffith, Boyce E ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Approximate projection method; Collocated discretization; Exact projection method; Fluid structure interaction; Immersed boundary method; Staggered grid discretization; Volume conservation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857571345     PISSN: 18152406     EISSN: 19917120     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4208/cicp.120111.300911s     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. C. S. Peskin. The immersed boundary method. Acta Numer., 11:479-517, 2002.
2. C. S. Peskin and B. F. Printz. Improved volume conservation in the computation of flows with immersed elastic boundaries. J. Comput. Phys., 105(1):33-46, 1993.
3. R. Cortez and M. L. Minion. The blob projection method for immersed boundary problems. J. Comput. Phys., 161(2):428-453, 2000.
4. Y. Kim and M.-C. Lai. Simulating the dynamics of inextensible vesicles by the penalty immersed boundary method. J. Comput. Phys., 229(12):4840-4853, 2010.
5. Y. Kim, M.-C. Lai, and C. S. Peskin. Numerical simulations of two-dimensional foam by the immersed boundary method. J. Comput. Phys., 229(13):5194-5207, 2010.
6. K. Shoele and Q. Zhu. Flow-induced vibrations of a deformable ring. J. Fluid Mech., 650:343-362, 2010.
7. E. P. Newren. Enhancing the immersed boundary method: stability, volume conservation, and implicit solvers. PhD thesis, University of Utah, 2007.
8. J. A. Stockie. Modelling and simulation of porous immersed boundaries. Comput. Struct., 87(11-12):701-709, 2009.
9. F. H. Harlow and J. E. Welch. Numerical calculation of time-dependent viscous incompresible flow of fluid with free surface. Phys. Fluid, 8(12):2182-2189, 1965.
10. W. J. Rider, J. A. Greenough, and J. R. Kamm. Accurate monotonicity-and extremapreserving methods through adaptive nonlinear hybridizations. J. Comput. Phys., 225(2):1827-1848, 2007.
11. P. Colella and P. R. Woodward. The piecewise parabolic method (PPM) for gas-dynamical simulations. J. Comput. Phys., 54(1):174-201, 1984.
12. A. J. Chorin. Numerical solution of the Navier-Stokes equations. Math. Comput., 22(104):745-762, 1968.
13. A. J. Chorin. On the convergence of discrete approximations to the Navier-Stokes equations. Math. Comput., 23(106):341-353, 1969.
14. J. Kim and P. Moin. Application of a fractional-step method to incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. J. Comput. Phys., 59(2):308-323, 1985.
15. J. B. Bell, P. Colella, and H. M. Glaz. A second-order projection method for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. J. Comput. Phys., 85(2):257-283, 1989.
16. A. S. Almgren, J. B. Bell, and W. G. Szymczak. A numerical method for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations based on an approximate projection. SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 17(2):358-369, 1996. (Pubitemid 126610882)
17. A. S. Almgren, J. B. Bell, P. Colella, L. H. Howell, and M. L. Welcome. A conservative adaptive projection method for the variable density incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. J. Comput. Phys., 142(1):1-46, 1998. (Pubitemid 128344797)
18. A. S. Almgren, J. B. Bell, and W. Y. Crutchfield. Approximate projection methods: Part I. Inviscid analysis. SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 22(4):1139-1159, 2000. (Pubitemid 32748646)
19. D. F. Martin and P. Colella. A cell-centered adaptive projection method for the incompressible Euler equations. J. Comput. Phys., 163(2):271-312, 2000.
20. D. L. Brown, R. Cortez, and M. L. Minion. Accurate projection methods for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. J. Comput. Phys., 168(2):464-499, 2001. (Pubitemid 33663736)
21. D. F. Martin, P. Colella, and D. Graves. A cell-centered adaptive projection method for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations in three dimensions. J. Comput. Phys., 227(3):1863-1886, 2008.
22. B. E. Griffith and C. S. Peskin. On the order of accuracy of the immersed boundary method: Higher order convergence rates for sufficiently smooth problems. J. Comput. Phys., 208(1):75-105, 2005. (Pubitemid 40714214)
23. B. E. Griffith, R. D. Hornung, D. M. McQueen, and C. S. Peskin. An adaptive, formally second order accurate version of the immersed boundary method. J. Comput. Phys., 223(1):10-49, 2007.
24. E. P. Newren, A. L. Fogelson, R. D. Guy, and R. M. Kirby. Unconditionally stable discretizations of the immersed boundary equations. J. Comput. Phys., 222(2):702-719, 2007.
25. B. E. Griffith, X. Luo, D. M. McQueen, and C. S. Peskin. Simulating the fluid dynamics of natural and prosthetic heart valves using the immersed boundary method. Int. J. Appl. Mech., 1(1):137-177, 2009.
26. B. E. Griffith, R. D. Hornung, D. M. McQueen, and C. S. Peskin. Parallel and adaptive simulation of cardiac fluid dynamics. In M. Parashar and X. Li, editors, Advanced Computational Infrastructures for Parallel and Distributed Adaptive Applications. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2009.
27. B. E. Griffith. An accurate and efficient method for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations using the projection method as a preconditioner. J. Comput. Phys., 228(20):7565-7595, 2009.
28. A. M. Roma, C. S. Peskin, and M. J. Berger. An adaptive version of the immersed boundary method. J. Comput. Phys., 153(2):509-534, 1999.
29. B. E. Griffith. Immersed boundary model of aortic heart valve dynamics with physiological driving and loading conditions. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Biomed. Eng., To appear.
30. IBAMR: An adaptive and distributed-memory parallel implementation of the immersed boundary method. http://ibamr.googlecode.com.
31. SAMRAI: Structured Adaptive Mesh Refinement Application Infrastructure. http://www.llnl.gov/CASC/SAMRAI.
32. R. D. Hornung and S. R. Kohn. Managing application complexity in the SAMRAI objectoriented framework. Concurrency Comput. Pract. Ex., 14(5):347-368, 2002. (Pubitemid 34491380)
33. R. D. Hornung, A. M. Wissink, and S. R. Kohn. Managing complex data and geometry in parallel structured AMR applications. Eng. Comput., 22(3-4):181-195, 2006.
34. S. Balay, K. Buschelman, W. D. Gropp, D. Kaushik, M. G. Knepley, L. C. McInnes, B. F. Smith, and H. Zhang. PETSc Web page, 2009. http://www.mcs.anl. gov/petsc.
35. S. Balay, K. Buschelman, V. Eijkhout, W. D. Gropp, D. Kaushik, M. G. Knepley, L. C. McInnes, B. F. Smith, and H. Zhang. PETSc users manual. Technical Report ANL-95/11 - Revision 3.0.0, Argonne National Laboratory, 2008.
36. S. Balay, V. Eijkhout, W. D. Gropp, L. C. McInnes, and B. F. Smith. Efficient management of parallelism in object oriented numerical software libraries. In E. Arge, A. M. Bruaset, and H. P. Langtangen, editors, Modern Software Tools in Scientific Computing, pages 163-202. Birkhäuser Press, 1997.
37. hypre: High performance preconditioners. http://www.llnl.gov/CASC/hypre.
38. R. D. Falgout and U. M. Yang. hypre: a library of high performance preconditioners. In P. M. A. Sloot, C. J. K. Tan, J. J. Dongarra, and A. G. Hoekstra, editors, Computational Science - ICCS 2002 Part III, volume 2331 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 632-641. Springer-Verlag, 2002. Also available as LLNL Technical Report UCRL-JC-146175.
39. D. Boffi, L. Gastaldi, L. Heltai, and C. S. Peskin. On the hyper-elastic formulation of the immersed boundary method. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engrg., 197(25-28):2210-2231, 2008. (Pubitemid 351494480)
40. B. E. Griffith and X. Luo. Hybrid finite difference/finite element version of the immersed boundary method. Submitted, preprint available from http://www.cims.nyu.edu/~griffith.
41. G. Tóth and P. L. Roe. Divergence-and curl-preserving prolongation and restriction formulas. J. Comput. Phys., 180(2):736-750, 2002.