A survey on virtualization of wireless sensor networks

Sensors

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 2175-2207

  Islam, Md Motaharul ^a   Hassan, Mohammad Mehedi ^b   Lee, Ga Won ^a   Huh, Eui Nam ^a  

^a Kyung Hee University   (South Korea)

^b KING SAUD UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

6LoWPAN; ALU; IP WSN; Sensor substrate; SInP; SVNSP; VSN

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER NETWORK; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; INSTRUMENTATION; REMOTE SENSING; TELEMETRY; THEORETICAL MODEL; TRANSDUCER;

COMPUTER COMMUNICATION NETWORKS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; REMOTE SENSING TECHNOLOGY; TELEMETRY; TRANSDUCERS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84857551369     PISSN: 14248220     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/s120202175     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Akyildiz, I.F.; Su, W.; Sankarasubramaniam, Y.; Cayirci, E. A survey on sensor networks. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2002, 40, 102-114.
2. Akka, K.; Younis, M. A survey on routing protocols for wireless sensor networks. Ad. Hoc. Netw. 2005, 3, 325-349.
3. Olariu, S.; Xu, Q. A simple and robust virtual infrastructure for massively deployed wireless sensor networks. J. Comput. Commun. 2005, 28, doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2004.12.038.
4. Shelby, Z.; Bormann, C. 6LoWPAN: The Wireless Embedded Internet; John Wiley & Sons Ltd: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2009.
5. Rodrigues, J.J.P.C.; Neves, P.A.C.S. A survey on IP-based wireless sensor network solutions. Int. J. Commun. Syst. 2010, 23, 963-998.
6. Islam, M.M.; Huh, E.-N. Sensor proxy mobile IPv6 (SPMIPv6)-A novel scheme for mobility supported IP-WSNs. Sensors 2011, 11, 1865-1887.
7. Islam, M.M.; Huh, E.-N. A novel addressing scheme for PMIPv6 based global IP-WSNs. Sensors 2011, 11, 8430-8455.
8. Faghih, M.M.; Moghaddam, M.E. SOMM: A new service oriented middleware for generic wireless multimedia sensor networks based on code mobility. Sensors 2011, 11, 10343-10371.
9. Alam, S.; Chowdhury, M.M.R.; Noll, J. Virtualizing sensor for the enablement of semantic-aware internet of things ecosystem. Int. J. Des. Anal. Tools Circuits Syst. 2011, 2, 41-51.
10. Harvan, M.; Schonwalder, J. A 6lowpan Implementation for Tiny OS 2.0. Presented at The Finish Graduate School of Neuroscience (FGSN) Symposium, Helsinki, Finland, 12-14 September 2007.
11. Manetti, V.; Canonico, R.; Stavrakakis, I. System-Level Virtualization and Mobile IP to Support Service Mobility. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Parallel Processing Workshops, Vienna, Austria, 22-25 September 2009.
12. Tutschku, K.; Tran-Gia, P.; Andersen, F.U. Trends in network and service operation for the emerging future Internet. Int. J. Electron. Commun. 2007, 62, 705-714.
13. Zhu, Y.; Ammar, M. Algorithm for Assigning Substrate Network Resources to Virtual Network Components. In Proceedings of the 25th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM 2006), Barcelona, Spain, 23-29 April 2006.
14. Oberle, K.; Kessler, M.; Stein, M.; Voith, T.; Lamp, D.; Berger, S. Network Virtualization: The Missing Piece. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligence on Next Generation Networks, Bordeaux, France, 26-29 October 2009.
15. Chowdhury, N.M.M.K.; Boutaba, R. A survey of network virtualization. Comput. Netw. 2010, 54, 862-876.
16. Levis, P.; Culler, D. Mate: A Tiny Virtual Machine for Sensor Networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, San Jose, CA, USA, 5-9 October 2002.
17. Tilak, S.; Chiu, K.; Nael, B.; Ghazaleh, A.; Fountain, T. Dynamic resource discovery for sensor networks. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2005, 3823/2005, 785-796.
18. Mottola, L.; Picco, G.P. Programming Wireless Sensor Networks with Logical Neighborhoods. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Integrated Internet Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks (InterSense'06), Nice, France, 29-31 May 2006; pp. 393-394.
19. Kabadayi, S.; Pridgen, A.; Julien, C. Virtual Sensors: Abstracting Data from Physical Sensors. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks, Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY, USA, 26-29 June 2006.
20. Polastre, J.; Hui, J.; Levis, P.; Zhao, J.; Culler, D.; Shenker, S.; Stoica, I. A Unifying Link Abstraction for Wireless Sensor Networks. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor, San Diego, CA, USA, 2-4 November 2005.
21. Shin, J.H.; Park, D. A virtual infrastructure for large-scale wireless sensor networks. J. Comput. Commun. 2007, 30, 2853-2866.
22. Virtual Sensor Network. Available online: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_sensor_network (accessed on 20 October 2011).
23. Overlay Network. Available online: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overlay_network (accessed on 10 January 2012).
24. Waharte, S.; Xiao, J.; Boutaba, R. Overlay Wireless Sensor Networks for Application-Adaptive Scheduling in WLAN. In Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on High Speed Networks and Multimedia Communications (HSNMC), Toulouse, France, 30 June-2 July 2004; LNCS 3079, pp. 676-684.
25. Yu, Y.; Rittle, L.J.; Bhandari, V.; LeBrun, J.B. Supporting Concurrent Applications in Wireless Sensor Networks. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, Boulder, CO, USA, 1-3 November 2006.
26. Houben, H. Virtual Sensor Technology for Mars Exploration. In Proceedings of 2006 Second Workshop on Mars Atmosphere Modelling and Observations, Granada, Spain, 27 February-3 March 2006.
27. Efstratiou, C.; Leontiadis, I.; Mascolo, C.; Crowcroft, J. Demo Abstract: A Shared Sensor Network Infrastructure. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (Sensys'10), Zurich, Switzerland, 3-5 November 2010.
28. Lei, S.; Xu, H.; Xiaoling, W.; Lin, Z.; Cho, J.; Lee, S.Y. VIP Bridge: Integrating Several Sensor Networks into One Virtual Sensor Network. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Internet Surveillance and Protection, Côte d'Azur, France, 26-28 August 2006.
29. Islam, M.M.; Hasan, M.M.; Huh, E.N. Virtualization in Wireless Sensor Network: Challenges and Opportunities. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT), Dhaka, Bangladesh, 23-25 December 2010.
30. Shu, L.; Cho, J.; Lee, S.Y.; Hauswirth, M.; Zhang, L. VIP Bridge: Leading ubiquitous sensor networks to the next generation. J. Internet Technol. 2007, 1, 299-311.
31. Hasan, M.M.; Song, B.; Huh, E.N. A dynamic and fast event matching algorithm for a content-based publish/subscribe information dissemination system in Sensor-Grid. J. Supercomput. 2010, 54, 330-365.
32. Bhattacharya, A.; Fernando, M.S.; Dasgupta, P. Community Sensor Grids: Virtualization for Sharing across Domains. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Virtualization in Mobile Computing, Breckenridge, CO, USA, 17-20 June 2008.
33. Tiny OS Information. Available online: http://www.tinyos.net/ (accessed on 10 October 2011).
34. Levis, P.; Gay, D.; Culler, D. Bridging the Gap: Programming Sensor Networks with Application Specific Virtual Machines; Technical Report No. UCB/CSD-04-1343; University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA, 2004.
35. Fok, C.-L.; Roman, G.-C.; Lu, C. Agilla: A mobile agent middleware for self-adaptive wireless sensor networks. ACM Trans. Auton. Adapt. Syst. 2009, 4, doi:10.1145/1552297.1552299.
36. Liu, T.; Martonosi, M. Impala: A Middleware System for Managing Autonomic, Parallel Sensor Systems. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles and Practice of Parallel Programming (PPoPP 03), San Diego, CA, USA, 11-13 June 2003; pp. 107-118.
37. Juang, P.; Oki, H.; Wang, Y.; Martonosi, M.; Peh, L.-S.; Rubenstein, D. Energy-Efficient Computing for Wildlife Tracking: Design Tradeoffs and Early Experiences with ZebraNet. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS-X), San Jose, CA, USA, 5-9 October 2002.
38. Lim, H.B.; Iqbal, M.; Ng, T.J. Demo Abstract: A Virtualization Framework for Heterogeneous Sensor Network Platforms. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, Berkeley, CA, USA, 4-6 November 2009.
39. Hassan, M.M.; Song, B.; Huh, E.N. A Framework of Sensor-Cloud Integration Opportunities and Challenges. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication, Suwon, Korea, 15-16 January 2009.
40. Federated Secure Sensor Network Laboratory. Available online: http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/research/srg/netos/fresnel/index.html (accessed on 20 October 2011).
41. VSNs Project. Available online: http://www.cnrl.colostate.edu/Project/VSNs/vsns.html (accessed on 20 October 2011).
42. Jayasumana, A.P.; Han, Q.; Illangasekare, T.I. Virtual Sensor Networks-A Resource Efficient Approach for Concurrent Applications. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Information Technology, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 2-4 April 2007.
43. H.M.N.D. Top-Down Clustering Based Self-Organization of Collaborative Wireless Sensor Networks, Master Thesis, Virtualizing Sensor for the Enablement of Semantic-aware Internet of Things Ecosystem, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA, 2008.
44. SensorPlanet. Available online: http://www.sensorplanet.org/ (accessed on 21 October 2011).
45. Sensor Virtualization and Slivering in an Outdoor Wide-Area Wireless GENI Sensor/Actuator Network Testbed. a.k.a. ViSE, VISE (short name for tickets), Sensor/Actuator Network (obsolete). Available online: http://groups.geni.net/geni/wiki/ViSE (accessed on 21 October 2011).
46. Multi-level Software Reconfiguration for Sensor Networks through Dynamically Extensible Virtual Machine. Available online: http://nesl.ee.ucla.edu/project/show/51 (accessed on 22 October 2011).
47. Han, C.-C.; Kumar, R.; Shea, R.; Kohler, E.; Srivastava, M. SOS-A Dynamic Operating System for Sensor Networks. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, And Services (Mobisys), Seattle, WA, USA, 6-8 June 2005.
48. Li, M.; Ganesan, D.; Shenoy, P. PRESTO: Feedback-driven data management in sensor networks. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2009, 17, 1256-1269.
49. PRESTO-A Predictive Storage Architecture for Sensor Networks. Available online: http://presto.cs.umass.edu/ (accessed on 22 October 2011).
50. Sharma, N.K.; Irwin, D.E.; Shenoy, P.J. VSense: Virtualizing Stateful Sensors with Actuators; Technical Report UM-CS-2009-033; University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA, 2009.
51. SensEye-Multi-Tier, Multi-Modal Camera Sensor Network. Available online: http://sensors.cs.umass.edu/projects/senseye/ (accessed on 22 October 2011).
52. Kulkarni, P.; Ganesan, D.; Shenoy, P.; Lu, Q. SensEye: A Multitier Camera Sensor Network. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual ACM International Conference on Multimedia, Singapore, 6-11 November 2005.
53. ESSense-Energy-Efficient Storage for SENSors. Available online: http://sensors.cs.umass.edu/projects/essense/ (accessed on 22 October 2011).
54. SenQ project. Available online: http://www.cs.virginia.edu/wsn/medical/projects/senq (accessed on 22 October 2011).
55. Wood, A.D.; Selavo, L.; Stankovic, J.A. SenQ: An Embedded Query System for Streaming Data in Heterogeneous Interactive Wireless Sensor Networks. In Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems, Santorini Island, Greece, 11-14 June 2008.
56. CTI Reserch, Unit 1. Available online: http://ru1.cti.gr/projects/webdust/wiki/JWebDust_application_enviroment (accessed on 25 October 2011).
57. An, C.; Timm-Giel, A.; Goerg, C. Virtual Sensor Network Lifeline for Communications in Fire Fighting Rescue Scenarios. In Proceedings of the IEEE 70th Vehicular Technology Conference, Anchorage, AK, USA, 20-23 September 2009.
58. Bokareva, T.; Hu, W.; Kanhere, S.; Ristic, B.; Gordon, N.; Bessell, T.; Rutten, M.; Jha, S. Wireless Sensor Networks for Battlefield Surveillance. In Proceedings of the Land Warfare Conference, Brisbane, QLD, Australia, 24-27 October 2006.
59. Onur, E.; Ersoy, C.; Delic, H.; Akarun, L. Surveillance with wireless sensor networks in obstruction: Breach paths as watershed contours. Int. J. Comput. Telecommun. Network. 2010, 54, doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2009.09.006.
60. The Gator Tech Smart House. Available online: http://www.icta.ufl.edu/gt.htm (accessed on 20 October 2011).
61. Kim, E.; Kaspar, D.; Chevrollier, N.; Vasseur, J.P. Design and Application Spaces for 6LoWPANs. Internet-Draft, 6LoWPAN Working Group, 2009.