Postpartum depression screening: A Comment on Leung et al.

Journal of Public Health

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 162-163

  Thombs, Brett D ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FEMALE; HUMAN; LETTER; MOTHER; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PUERPERAL DEPRESSION;

DEPRESSION, POSTPARTUM; FEMALE; HUMANS; MOTHERS;

EID: 84857548279     PISSN: 17413842     EISSN: 17413850     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdr110     Document Type: Letter

References (8)

1. Leung SSL, Leung C, Lam TH et al. Outcome of a postnatal depression screening programme using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: a randomized controlled trial. J Public Health 2011;33(2):292-301.
2. UK National Screening Committee. Second report of the UK National Screening Committee. Northern Ireland and Wales: Departments of Health for England, Scotland, 2000.
3. Raffle A, Gray M. Screening: Evidence and Practice. UK: Oxford University Press, 2007.
4. Hewitt CE, Gilbody SM, Brealey S et al. Methods to identify postnatal depression in primary care: an integrated evidence synthesis and value of information analysis. Health Technol Assess 2009;13(36).
5. Gilbody S, Bower P, Fletcher J et al. Collaborative care for depression: a cumulative meta-analysis and review of longer-term outcomes. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:2314-21. (Pubitemid 44833355)
6. Ioannidis JPA. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med 2005;2:e124.
7. DeAngelis CD, Drazen JM, Frizelle FA et al. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. JAMA 2004;292(11):1363-4. (Pubitemid 39223230)
8. Dickersin K, Rennie D. Registering clinical trials. JAMA 2003;290(4):516-23.