Development of the Brief Assessment of Prospective Memory (BAPM) for use with traumatic brain injury populations

Neuropsychological Rehabilitation

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 884-898

  Man, David W K ^a   Fleming, Jennifer ^b,c,d   Hohaus, Lydia ^e   Shum, David ^e  

^a HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY   (Hong Kong)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^c PRINCESS ALEXANDRA HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^d QUEENSLAND HEALTH   (Australia)

^e GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Prospective memory; Questionnaire; Rehabilitation; Reliability; Self report; Validity

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; EPISODIC MEMORY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MEMORY DISORDER; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BRAIN INJURIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY DISORDERS; MEMORY, EPISODIC; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84857532170     PISSN: 09602011     EISSN: 14640694     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2011.627270     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Chau, L. T., Lee, J. B., Fleming, J., Roche, N., & Shum, D. (2007). Reliability and normative data for the Comprehensive Assessment of Prospective Memory (CAPM). Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 17(6), 707-722. (Pubitemid 350145758)
2. Crawford, J., Smith, G. M., Maylor, E., Della Sala, S., & Logie, R. (2003). The Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (PRMQ): Normative data and latent structure in a large non-clinical sample. Memory, 11(3), 261-275. (Pubitemid 36621509)
3. Edwards, P., Roberts, I., Sandercock, P., & Frost, C. (2004). Follow-up by mail in clinical trials: Does questionnaire length matter? Controlled Clinical Trials, 25, 31-52. (Pubitemid 38230102)
4. Fleming, J., Kennedy, S., Fisher, R., Gill, H., Gullo, M., & Shum, D. (2009). Validity of the Comprehensive Assessment of Prospective Memory (CAPM) for use with adults with traumatic brain injury. Brain Impairment, 10(1), 34-44.
5. Fleming, J. M., Strong, J., & Ashton, R. (1998). Cluster analysis of self-awareness levels in adults with traumatic brain injury and relationship to outcome. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 13(5), 39-51. (Pubitemid 28461763)
6. Hannon, R., Adams, P., Harrington, S., Fries-Dias, C., & Gipson, M. T. (1995). Effects of brain injury and age on prospective memory self-rating and performance. Rehabilitation Psychology, 40(4), 289-298. (Pubitemid 26117235)
7. Herrmann, D. J. (1983). Questionnaires about memory. In J. E. Harris & P. E. Morris (Eds.), Everyday memory actions and absent-mindedness (pp. 133-151). London, UK: Academic Press.
8. Hobart, J. C., & Thompson, A. J. (2001). Assessment measures and clinical scales. In R. J. Guiloff (Ed.), Clinical trials in neurology (pp. 17-28). London, UK: Springer.
9. Kvavilashvili, L., & Ellis, J. (1996). Varieties of intention: Some distinctions and classifications. In M. Brandimonte, G. O. Einstein, & M. A. McDaniel (Eds.), Prospective memory: Theory and applications (pp. 23-51). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Levin, H. (1989). Memory deficits after closed head injury. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
11. Mateer, C. A., Sohlberg, M. M., & Crinean, J. (1987). Focus on clinical research: Perceptions of memory function in individuals with closed-head injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 2, 74-84. (Pubitemid 17125213)
12. Ownsworth, T. L, Fleming, J., Strong, J., Radel, M., Chan, W., & Clare, L. (2007). Awareness typologies and long-term emotional adjustment and psychosocial outcomes following acquired brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 17, 129-150. (Pubitemid 46594794)
13. Raskin, S. (2009). Memory for Intentions Screening Test: Psychometric properties and clinical evidence. Brain Impairment, 10, 23-33.
14. Roche, N. L., Fleming, J. M., & Shum, D. K. (2002). Self-awareness of prospective memory failure in adults with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 16, 931-945. (Pubitemid 35339311)
15. Shum, D., Valentine, M., & Cutmore, T. (1999). Performance of individuals with severe longterm traumatic brain injury on time-, event-, and activity-based prospective memory tasks. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 21(1), 49-58. (Pubitemid 29331995)
16. Smith, G., Della Sala, S. D., Logie, R. H., & Maylor, E. A. (2000). Prospective and retrospective memory in normal ageing and dementia: A questionnaire study. Memory, 8, 311-321.
17. Sunderland, A., Harris, J. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1983). Do laboratory tests predict everyday memory? A neuropsychological study. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22(3), 341-357.
18. Tate, R., Hodgkinson, A., Veerbangsa, A., & Maggiotto, S. (1999). Measuring psychosocial recovery after traumatic brain injury: Psychometric properties of a new scale. Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 14(6), 543-557. (Pubitemid 30027262)
19. Uttl, B., & Kibreab, M. (2011). Self-report measures of prospective memory are reliable but not valid. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 57-68.
20. Vakil, E. (2005). The effect of moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) on different aspects of memory: A selective review. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 27(8), 977-1021. (Pubitemid 41527533)
21. Waugh, N. (1999). Self-report of the young, middle-aged, young-old and old-old individuals on prospective memory functioning (Unpublished honours thesis). Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
22. Wilson, B., Emslie, H., Foley, J., Shiel, A., Watson, P., Hawkins, K., et al. (2005). Cambridge Prospective Memory Test (CAMPROMPT) Manual. Oxford, UK: Harcourt Assessment.
23. World Health Organisation (2001). International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organisation.