Learning a log-linear model with bilingual phrase-pair features for statistical machine translation

SIGHAN@IJCNLP 2005 - 4th SIGHAN Workshop on Chinese Language Processing, Proceedings of the Workshop

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 79-86

  Zhao, Bing ^a   Waibel, Alex ^a  

^a Carnegie Mellon University   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; COMPUTER AIDED LANGUAGE TRANSLATION; FUNCTIONS; LEARNING SYSTEMS;

BILINGUALS; FEATURE FUNCTION; GENERATIVE MODEL; LOGLINEAR MODEL; MODELLING FRAMEWORK; MODELS OF LEARNING; PARALLEL DATA; PHRASE-BASED STATISTICAL MACHINE TRANSLATION; SMALL DATA; STATISTICAL MACHINE TRANSLATION;

REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 84857515308     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. RR Brown, Stephen A. Deila Pietra, Vincent. J. Deila Pietra, and Robert L. Mercer. 1993. The mathematics of Statistical machine translation: Parameter estimation. In Computational Linguistics, volume 19(2), pages 263-331.
2. Heidi J. Pox. 2002. Phrasal cohesion and statistical machine translation. In Proc. ofthe Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 304-311, Philadelphia, PA, July 6-7.
3. Philipp Koehn, Pranz Josef Och, and Daniel Marcu. 2003. Statistical phrase-based machine translation. In Proc. of HLT-NAACL 2003, pages 48-54, Edmonton, Canada, May-June.
4. Philip Koehn. 2004. Pharaoh: a beam search decoder for phrase-based smt. In Proceedings of the Conference of the Association for Machine Translation in the Americans (AMTA).
5. Pranz J. Och and Hermann Ney. 2002. Discriminative training and maximum entropy models for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings ofthe 40th Annual Meeting ofACL, pages 440-447.
6. Pranz J. Och and Hermann Ney. 2003. A systematic comparison of various statistical alignment models. In Computational Linguistics, volume 29, pages 19-51.
7. Franz J. Och and Hermann Ney. 2004. The alignment template approach to statistical machine translation. In Computational Linguistics, volume 30, pages 417^49.
8. Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, and Todd Ward. 1998. Maximum likelihood and discriminative training of direct translation models. In Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech & Signal Processing, volume 1, pages 189-192, Seattle, May.
9. Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Todd Ward, and Wei-Jing Zhu. 2002. Bleu: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In Proc. of the 40th Annual Conf. of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 02), pages 311-318, Philadelphia, PA, July.
10. Christoph Tillmann. 2003. A projection extension algorithm for statistical machine translation. In Proc. ofthe Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.
11. Stephan Vogel, Ying Zhang, Fei Huang, Alicia Tribble, Ashish Venogupal, Bing Zhao, and Alex Waibel. 2003. The emu statistical machine translation system. In Proc. ofMT SUMMIT IX, pages 257-264, New Orleans, LA, September.
12. Dekai Wu. 1997. Stochastic inversion transduction grammars and bilingual parsing of parallel corpora. In Computational Linguistics, volume 23(3), pages 377-403.
13. R. Zens and H. Ney. 2004. Improvements in phrase-based statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference (HLT-NAACL)s, pages 257-264, Boston, MA, May.
14. Bing Zhao and Stephan Vogel. 2005. A generahzed alignment-free phrase extraction. In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Building and Using Parallel Texts, pages 141-144, Ann Arbor, Michigan, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.