TEN KEY PRINCIPLES FROM RESEARCH FOR THE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF MATHEMATICS TEACHERS

Stepping Stones for the 21st Century: Australasian Mathematics Education Research

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 27-39

  Clarke, Doug ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857512543     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1163/9789087901509_004     Document Type: Chapter

References (36)

1. Clarke, D. M. (1991). The role of staff development programs in facilitating professional growth. University of Wisconsin-Madison: Unpublished manuscript.
2. Day, C. (1985). Professional learning and researcher intervention: An action research perspective. British Educational Research Journal, 77, 133-151.
3. Doyle, W. & Ponder, G. A. (1977). The practicality ethic in teacher decision making. Interchange 8, 112.
4. Fenstermacher, G. D. & Berliner, D. C. (1985).Determining the value of staff development. Elementary School Journal, 85, 281-314.
5. Fullan, M. G. (1991).The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
6. Fullan, M. G. (1990). Staff development, innovation and institutional development. In B. Joyce (Ed.) Changing school culture through staff development. Yearbook of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (pp. 3-25). Alexandria, Va.: The Association.
7. Goldsmith, L. T. & Nelson, B. S. (1991). Transforming teachers: Perception, practice, and reality. Paper presented at the Psychology of Mathematics Education Research Precession, (Research Methodologies for Studying Teacher Change), October. Blacksburg, Va.
8. Griffin, G. A. (1991). Interactive staff development: Using what we know. In A. Lieberman & L. Miller (Eds.) Staff development for education in the nineties: New demands, new realities, new perspectives, (pp. 243-258). New York: Teachers College Press.
9. Guskey, T. R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher 15 (May), 5-12.
10. Hall, G. E. & Loucks, S. (1978). Teachers’ concerns as a basis for facilitating and personalizing staff development. Teachers College Record 80 (September), 36-53.
11. Huberman, A. M. & Miles, M. B. (1984). Innovation up close: How school improvement works. New York: Plenum Publishing Corp.
12. Little, J. W. (1982). Norms of collegiality and experimentation: Workplace conditions of school success. American Educational Research Journal 19 (Fall), 325-340.
13. Lovitt, C. J. & Clarke, D. M. (1988 & 1989). Mathematics curriculum and teaching program activity bank. (Vols. 1 & 2). Carlton, Victoria, Australia: Curriculum Corp.
14. McEvoy, B. (1985). Everyday acts: Staff development as continuous informal routine. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. April, Chicago.
15. McLaughlin, M. W. (1991). Enabling professional development: What have we learned? In A. Lieberman & L. Miller (Eds.) Staff development for education in the nineties: New demands, new realities, new perspectives, (pp. 61-82). New York: Teachers College Press.
16. McLaughlin, M. W. & Marsh, D. D. (1978). Staff development and school change. Teachers College Record, 80, 69-94.
17. McPherson, B. (1980). Are they in roses? Teachers and staff development. Journal of Education 162, 120-134.
18. Moles, O. C. (Ed.), (1988). High school and beyond: Administrator and teacher survey (1984). Data file user’s manual. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
19. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, Va.: The Council.
20. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, Va.: The Council.
21. Romberg, T. A. & Price, G. G. (1983). Curriculum implementation and staff development as cultural change. In G. Griffin (Ed.), Staff development. Eighty-second Yearbook of the National Society for Study in Education. Part 2, (pp. 154-184). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Schlechty, P. (Ed.), (1983). Understanding and managing staff development in an urban school system. Final Report. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Education.
23. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and learning: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 7(February), 1-22.
24. Simon, M. A. & Schifter, D. (1991). Towards a constructivist perspective: An intervention study of mathematics teacher development. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 309-331.
25. Snyder, J., Bolin, F. & Zumwalt, K. (1992). Curriculum implementation. In P. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum. (pp. 402-435). New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.
26. Stephens, W. M., Lovitt, C. J., Clarke, D. M. & Romberg, T. A. (1989). Principles for the professional development of teachers of mathematics. In N. Ellerton & M. A. Clements (Eds.), School mathematics: The challenge to change, (pp. 220-249). Geelong, Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press.
27. Stigler, J. W. & Stevenson, H. W. (1991). How Asian teachers polish each lesson to perfection. American Educator, 15 (Spring), 12-47.
28. Thompson, A. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of research. In D.A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, (pp. 127-146). New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.
29. Wood, F. H. & Thompson, S. R. (1980). Guidelines for better staff development. Educational Leadership, 37 (February), 374-378.
30. Zigarmi, P., Betz, L & Jensen, D. (1977). Teachers’ preferences in and perceptions of in-service education. Educational Leadership, 34 (April), 545-551.
31. Timplerly, H, Wilson, A, Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis iteration [BES]. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
32. Borasi, R., Fonzi, J., Smith, C., & Rose, B. (1999). Beginning the process of rethinking mathematics instruction: A professional development program. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2(1), 49-78.
33. Clarke, D. (2001). Understanding, assessing and developing young children’s mathematical thinking: Research as powerful tool for professional growth. In J. Bobis, R. Perry & M. Mitchelmore (Eds.), Numeracy and Beyond (pp. 1-18). Refereed Proceedings of the Annual Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia Conference, Sydney.
34. Edwards, T., & Hensien, S. (1999). Changing instructional practice through action research. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2(2), 187-206.
35. Sharp, J. (2001). Distance education: A powerful medium for developing teachers’ geometric thinking. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 20(2), 199-219.
36. Sowder, J. T. (in press). The mathematical education and development of teachers. Retrieved on 3/12/06 from http://www.sci.sdsu.edu/CRMSE/HB_Sowder_chapter.pdf.