STB: Child-Dependent Sociable Trash Box

International Journal of Social Robotics

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 359-370

  Yamaji, Yuto ^a   Miyake, Taisuke ^a   Yoshiike, Yuta ^a   de Silva, P Ravindra S ^a   Okada, Michio ^a  

^a TOYOHASHI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Children dependent robot; Proxemics; Sociable trash box; Social coupling

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL ROBOTS; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS;

INTERACTIVE SPACES; MODEL-BASED OPC; PROXEMICS; SOCIABLE TRASH BOX; SOCIAL CUES; UNSUPERVISED APPROACHES; VOCAL INTERACTION;

SOCIAL ROBOTS;

EID: 84857509466     PISSN: 18754791     EISSN: 18754805     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12369-011-0114-y     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Adams JA (2005) Human-robot interaction design: Understanding user needs and requirements. In: Human factors and ergonomics society 49th annual meeting
2. Breazeal C (2003) Toward sociable robots. Robot Auton Syst 42(3-4):167-175
3. Breazeal C, Takanishi A, Kobayashi T (2008) Social robots that interact with people. In: Springer handbook of robotics. Springer, Berlin, pp 1349-1369
4. Crandall JW, Goodrich MA (2002) Principles of adjustable interactions. In: 2002 AAAI fall symposium human-robot interaction workshop
5. Feil-Seifer DJ, Mataric MJ (2011) Ethical principles for socially assistive robotics. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 18(1):24-31
6. Feil-Seifer D, Skinner K, Matarić MJ (2007) Benchmarks for evaluating socially assistive robotics. Interact Stud 8:423-429
7. Fong T, Nourbakhsh IR (2003) Socially interactive robots. Robot Auton Syst 42(3-4):139-141
8. Gillespie DL, Leffler A (1983) Theories of non-verbal behavior: a critical review of proxemics research. Soc Theory 1:120-154
9. Hall ET (1990) The hidden dimension. Anchor, Peterborough
10. Hall ET (1974) Handbook for proxemics research. Society for the Anthropology of Visual Communication
11. Harrigan JA, Rosenthal R, Scherer KR (2005) Proxemics, ki-nesics, and gaze
12. Hoffman G, Breazeal C (2008) Anticipatory perceptual simulation for human-robot joint practice: theory and application study. In: AAAI, pp 1357-1362
13. Kado Y, Kamoda T, Yoshiike Y, Silva PRD, Okada M (2010) Sociable dining table: the effectiveness of a "konkon" interface for reciprocal adaptation. In: HRI, pp 105-106
14. Kinzer K (2009) Tweenbots. http://www.tweenbots.com/, ITP
15. Lim G, Suh I (2010) Robust robot knowledge instantiation for intelligent service robots. Intell Serv Robot. doi:10.1007/ s11370-010-0063-6
16. Nomura T, Shintani T, Fujii K, Hokabe K (2007) Experimental investigation of relationships between anxiety, negative attitudes, and allowable distance of robots. In: Proceedings of the second IASTED international conference on human computer interaction. ACTA Press, Calgary, pp 13-18
17. Okada M, Sakamoto S, Suzuki N (2000) Muu: artificial creatures as an embodied interface. In: 27th international conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques (SIGGRAPH 2000), the emerging technologies: point of departure
18. Pollack ME (2005) Intelligent technology for an aging population: the use of AI to assist elders with cognitive impairment. AI Mag 26(2):9-24
19. Redner RA, Walker HF (1984) Mixture densities, maximum likelihood and the em algorithm. SIAM Rev 26:195-239
20. Schweitzer G (2003) Robotics-chances and challenges of a key science. In: 17th International congress of mechanical engineering (COM03). University of Cambridge, Cambridge
21. Severinson Eklundh K, Green A, Hüttenrauch H (2003) Social and collaborative aspects of interaction with a service robot. Robot Auton Syst 42(3-4):223-234
22. Silva RSD, Tadano K, Saito A, Lambacher SG, Higashi M (2009) Therapeutic-assisted robot for children with autism. In: IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, pp 3561-3567
23. Skinner BF (1965) Science and human behavior. Free Press, Skinner Foundation, New York
24. Stratton LO, Tekippe DJ, Flick GL (1973) Personal space and self concept. Sociometry 424-429
25. van Oosterhout T, Visser A (2008) A visual method for robot prox-emics measurements. In: Proceedings of metrics for human-robot interaction: a workshop at the third ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI08), pp 61-68
26. Walters M, Koay KL, Woods SN, Syrdal DS, Dautenhahn K (2007) Robot to human approaches: comfortable distances and preferences. In: AAAI spring symposium on multidisciplinary collaboration for socially assistive robotics (AAAI SS07-2007), pp 61-68
27. Walters ML, Dautenhahn K, Koay KL, Kaouri C, Boekhorst RT, Nehaniv C, Werry I, Lee D (2005) Close encounters: spatial distances between people and a robot of mechanistic appearance. In: Proceedings of the IEEE-RAS international conference on hu-manoid robots, pp 450-455
28. Wang A (2006) Physically animated desktop computer for er-gonomic & affective movement. Master Thesis, MIT
29. Weng Y-H, Chen C-H, Sun C-T (2007) The legal crisis of next generation robots: on safety intelligence. In: ICAIL'07: proceedings of the 11th international conference on artificial intelligence and law, New York, NY, USA. ACM Press, New York, pp 205-209
30. Wilkes D, Alford A, Pack R, Rogers T, Peters RA, Kawamura K (1998) Toward socially intelligent service robots. Appl Artif Intell 12(8-9):729-766
31. Yamaoka F, Kanda T, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2009) Developing a model of robot behavior to identify and appropriately respond to implicit attention-shifting. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on human robot interaction, HRI'09. ACM Press, New York, pp 133-140
32. Yoshiike Y, Silva PRD, Okada M (2010) Cues for sociable pc: coordinate and synchronize its cues based on user attention and activities on display. In: HRI, pp 135-136