Diversity and ecology of diatoms from Felent creek (Sakarya river basin), Turkey;Felent çayı (sakarya nehir havzası) diyatomelerinin çeşitliliǧi ve ekolojisi

Turkish Journal of Botany

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 191-203

  Solak, Cüneyd Nadir ^a   Barinova, Sophia ^b   Ács, Éva ^c   Dayioǧlu, Hayri ^a  

^a DUMLUPINAR UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

^c Danube ResearchInstitute of Hungarian Academy of Sciience   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Biomonitoring; Diatom; Ecological indices; Felent creek; Saprobity

Indexed keywords

AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM; BIOINDICATOR; BIOMONITORING; DIATOM; ORGANIC POLLUTANT; RIVER WATER; SALINITY; SPECIES RICHNESS; SUMMER; WATER QUALITY;

SAKARYA BASIN; TURKEY;

BACILLARIOPHYTA;

EID: 84857497791     PISSN: 1300008X     EISSN: 13036106     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3906/bot-1102-16     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Akbulut A & Dügel M (2008). Planktonic diatom assemblages and their relationship to environmental variables in lakes of Salt Lake Basin (Central Anatolia-Turkey). Fresenius Environ Bull 17: 154-164.
2. Almeida SFP (2001). Use of diatoms for freshwater quality evaluation in Portugal. Limnetica 20: 205-213.
3. AtazadehI, Sharifi M & Kelly MG (2007). Evaluation of the Trophic Diatom Index for assessing water quality in River Gharasou, Western Iran. Hydrobiologia 589: 165-173.
4. Atici T (1997). Pollution of Sakarya river and algae. Ekoloji 24: 28-32.
5. Atici T, Obali O, Akköz C & Elmaci A (2001). Isolation and identification of halophytic algae from salty soil around Salt Lake of Turkey. Pakistan J Biol Sci 4: 298-300.
6. Atici T & Ahiska S (2005). Pollution and algae of Ankara Stream. Gazi Üniv Fen Bil Derg 18: 51-59.
7. Atici T & Obali O (2010). The diatoms of Asartepe Dam Lake (Ankara), withenvironmental and some physicochemical properties. Turk J Bot 34: 541-548.
8. Atici T & Yildiz K (1996). Sakarya Nehri diyatomeleri. Turk J Bot 20: 119-134.
9. Ács É, Szabó K, Tóth B & Kiss KT (2004). Investi{dotless}gati{dotless}on of benthic algal communities, especially diatoms of some Hungarian streams in connection withreference conditions of the Water Framework Directives. Acta Botanica Hungarica 46: 255-277.
10. Barinova SS, Tavassi M & Nevo E (2006a). Algal indicator system of environmental variables in the Hadera River basin, central Israel. Plant Biosystems 140: 65-79.
11. Barinova SS, Medvedeva LA & Anissimova OV (2006b). Diversity of algal indicators in environmental assessment. Pilies Studio, Tel Aviv (in Russian).
12. Barinova SS, Tavassi M & Nevo E (2010). Algal communities of the Hadera River (Israel) under dramatic niche changes. Cent Eur J Biol 5: 507-521.
13. Barinova SS, Kukhaleishvili L, Nevo E & Janelidze Z (2011). Diversity and ecology of algae in the Algeti National Park as a part of the Georgian system of protected areas. Turk J Bot 33: doi:10.3906/bot-1009-83.
14. Baykal T, Akbulut A, Açikgöz I, Udoh AU, Yildiz K & Şen B (2009). New records for the freshwater algae of Turkey. Turk J Bot 33: 141-152.
15. Bingöl N, Özyurt S, Dayioǧlu H, Yamik A & Solak CN (2007). Yukari{dotless} Porsuk Çayi{dotless} (Kütahya) epilitik diyatomeleri. Ekoloji 62: 23-29.
16. Blanco S, Bécares A, Cauchie H-M, Hoffmann L & Ector L (2007). Comparison of biotic indices for water quality diagnosis in the Duero Basin (Spain). ArchHydrobiol (suppl. Large Rivers) 17: 267-286.
17. Blanco S, Ector L, Huck V, Monnier O, Cauchie H-M, Hoffmann L & Becares A (2008). Diatom assemblages and water quality assessment in the Duero Basin (NW Spain). Belg J Bot 141: 39-50.
18. Bona F, Falasco E, Fassina S, Griselli B & Badino G (2007). Characterization of diatom assemblages in mid-altitude streams of NW Italy. Hydrobiologia 583: 265-274.
19. Çevre ve Orman Bakanli{dotless}ǧi{dotless} (2004). Türkiye Çevre Atlasi{dotless}. - T. C. Çevre ve Orman Bakanli{dotless}ǧi{dotless}, Çevre Envanteri Daire Başkanli{dotless}ǧi{dotless}, Ankara.
20. Dell'Uomo A & Torrisi M (2009). Freshwater algae and their usefulness in safeguarding the Mediterranean basin. Bocconea 23: 5-17.
21. Ector L & Rimet F (2005). Using bioindicators to assess rivers in Europe: An overview. In: Lek S, Scardi M, Verdonschot P, Descy J-P & Park YS (eds), Modelling Community Structure in Freshwater Ecosystems, pp. 7-19, Berlin: Springer Press.
22. Fieo MJ, Almeida SFP, Craveiro SC & Calado AJ (2009). A comparison between biotic indices and predictive models in stream water quality assessment based on benthic Diatom communities. Ecol Indic 9: 497-507.
23. Gezerler-Sipal U, Aysel V & Güner H (1994). Bandi{dotless}rma Kusgölü'ne dökülen Si{dotless}gi{dotless}rci{dotless} Dere'nin alg florasi{dotless} ve çevresinin kirlenmesindeki etkileri. Ege Üniv Fen Fak Derg 16: 351-356.
24. Guiry MD & Guiry GM (2009). AlgaeBase, World-wide electronic publication, National University of Ireland, Galway. Website: http://www.algaebase.org, [accessed December 2009].
25. Korde NV (1956). The methods of biological studies for the bottom deposits of lakes (the field methods of biological analysis). Moscow, Leningrad: Nauka Press (in Russian).
26. Krammer K & Lange-Bertalot H (1986) Bacillariophyceae. 1. Teil: Naviculaceae. Süßwasser von mitteleuropa. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Band 2-1, Stuttgart.
27. Krammer K & Lange-Bertalot H (1988) Bacillariophyceae. 2. Teil: Bacillariophyceae, Epithemiaceae, Surirellaceae. Süßwasser von mitteleuropa. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Band 2-2, Stuttgart.
28. Krammer K & Lange-Bertalot H (1991a) Bacillariophyceae. 3. Teil: Centrales, Fragilariaceae, Eunotiaceae. Süßwasser von mitteleuropa. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Band 2-3, Stuttgart.
29. Krammer K & Lange-Bertalot H (1991b) Bacillariophyceae. 4. Teil: Achnantheceae, Kritische Ergänzungen zu Navicula (Lincolatae) und Gomphonema. Cesamptliteraturverzeichnis Süßwasser von mitteleuropa. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Band 2-4, Stuttgart.
30. Ongun-Sevindik T, Çelik K & Gönülol A (2010). Twenty-four new records for the freshwater algae of Turkey. Turk J Bot 34: 249-259.
31. Pantle E & Buck H (1955). Die biologische Uberwachung der Gewasser und die Darstellung der Ergebnisse. Gas- und Wasserfach 96: 1-604.
32. Resende PC, Resende P, Pardal M, Almeida S & Azeiteiro U (2009). Use of biological indicators to assess water quality of the Ul River (Portugal). Environ Monit Assess 170: 535-544.
33. Romanenko VD, Oksijuk OP, Zhukinsky VN, Stolberg FV & Lavrik VI (1990). Ecological impact assessment of hydrotechnical constructions on water bodies. Kijev: Naukova Dumka (in Russian).
34. Sladeček V (1973). System of water quality from the biological point of view. Ergebnisse der Limnologie 7: 1-128.
35. Sladeček V (1986). Diatoms as indicators of organic pollution, Acta HydrochHydrob 14: 555-566.
36. Solak CN (2011). The application of diatom indices in the Upper Porsuk River, Kutahya-Turkey. Turk J FishAquat Sci 11: 31-36.
37. Solak CN, Ector L, Wojtal A, Ács É & Morales E (2012). A review of investigations on diatoms (Bacillariophyta) in Turkishinland waters. Nova Hedwigia Beiheft e 141: 431-462.
38. Squires LE & Saoud NS (1986). Effects of water quality and season on diatom community structure in the Damour River, Lebanon. Hydrobiologia 133: 127-141.
39. Sumita M (1986). A numerical water quality assessment of rivers in Hokuriku District using epilithic diatom assemblage in riverbed as a biological indicator. (II) The values of RPId in surveyed rivers. Japan Journal of Diatomology 2: 9-18.
40. Swift E (1967). Cleaning diatom frustules withultraviolet radiation and peroxide. Phycologia 6: 161-163.
41. Tavassi M, Barinova SS, Anissimova OV, Nevo E & Wasser SP (2004). Algal indicators of environment in the Nahal (River) Yarqon basin, central Israel. International Journal of Algae 6: 355-382.
42. Tavassi M, Barinova SS & Nevo E (2008). Examination of water quality from the Yarqon River (Central Israel) using the glass slide method to define algal vegetative activity (in vitro). Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 6: 113-125.
43. ter Braak CJF (1987). The analysis of vegetation-environment relationships by canonical correspondence analysis. Vegetatio 69: 69-77.
44. ter Braak CJF (1990). Interpreting canonical correlation analysis throughbiplots of structural correlations and weights. Psychometrica 55: 519-531.
45. Urrea G & Sabater S (2009). Epilithic diatom assemblages and their relationship to environmental characteristics in an agricultural watershed (Guadiana River, SW Spain). Ecol Indic 9: 693-703.
46. Van Dam H, Mertens A & Sinkeldam S (1994). A coded checklist and ecological indicator values of freshwater diatoms from The Netherlands. Netherland Journal of Aquatic Ecology 28: 117-133.
47. Watanabe T, Asai K & Houki A (1986). Numerical estimation to organic pollution of flowing water by using the epilithic diatom assemblage-Diatom Assemblage Index (DAIpo). Science Total Environment 55: 209-218.
48. Whitton BA, Rott E & Friedrich G (1991). Use of algae for monitoring rivers. Innsbruck: Institut für Botanik University Press.
49. Yildiz K (1987). Diatoms of the Porsuk River, Turkey. Turk J Biol 11: 162-182.
50. Yildiz K & Atici T (1996). Ankara Çayi{dotless} diyatomeleri. Gazi Üniv Fen Edebiyat Fak Derg 6: 59-87.
51. Yildiz K & Özkiran Ö (1994). Çubuk Çayi{dotless} diyatomlari{dotless}. Turk J Biol 18: 313-329.
52. Ziller S & Montesanto B (2004). Phytobenthos (diatoms) and water framework directive implementation: The case of two Mediterranean rivers in Greece. Fresenius Environ Bull 13: 128-138.