The rocky road to educational change: Adopting the entry-level PharmD at Maryland, 1989-93

Journal of the American Pharmacists Association

Volumn 51, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 692-694

  Knapp, David A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF PHARMACY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FIPRONIL;

ATTENTION; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; HUMAN; PHARMACIST; REVIEW; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITY; ARTICLE; EDUCATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PHARMACY STUDENT; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; SCHOOL;

EDUCATION, PHARMACY; HUMANS; MARYLAND; PHARMACISTS; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; SCHOOLS, PHARMACY; STUDENTS, PHARMACY;

EID: 84857492512     PISSN: 15443191     EISSN: 15443450     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1331/JAPhA.2011.10156     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Knapp DA. Comments on curriculum length and content. Am J Pharm Educ. 1973;37:287-9.
2. Knapp DA. The case for multiple degree programs in pharmacy. Contemp Pharm Pract. 1980;3(2):64-7.
3. American Council on Pharmaceutical Education. Declaration of intent: revision of accreditation standards in 1990's in keeping with changes in pharmacy practice and pharmaceutical education. Chicago: American Council on Pharmaceutical Education; 1989.
4. School moves to all doctor of pharmacy program. Maryland Pharmacist. 1990;66(2):11-2, 28.
5. Maryland Pharmacists Association. Resolutions no. 5 and no. 5-B, adopted as amended by the House of Delegates. Proceedings of the Maryland Pharmacists Association Annual Meeting, Ocean City, MD, June 20, 1990.
6. SRI International. Final report: an assessment of future educational needs for community pharmacists. Alexandria, VA: National Association of Chain Drug Stores; 1990.
7. Gallup Organization. Executive summary: a Gallup survey of pharmacy school faculty. Alexandria, VA: National Association of Chain Drug Stores; 1990.
8. Maryland Pharmacists Association. Resolution no. 9, for consideration by the MPhA House of Delegates. Proceedings of the Maryland Pharmacists Association Annual Meeting, Ocean City, MD, June 19, 1991.
9. Kuntz LA. The great divide. Pharmacy Update. 1991;2(30):1, 4-5, 10-1, 13.
10. Joint statement on the entry-level doctor of pharmacy degree. Am Pharm. 1992;NS32:54.
11. AACP Commission to Implement Change in Pharmaceutical Education. Entry-level education in pharmacy: commitment to change. Am J Pharm Educ. 1993;57:366-74.
12. National Association of Boards of Pharmacy. NABP 88th annual meeting delegates support a doctor of pharmacy as sole entry-level degree [news release]. Park Ridge, IL: National Association of Boards of Pharmacy; 1992.
13. American College of Clinical Pharmacy. Pharmaceutical education: a commentary from the American College of Clinical Pharmacy. ACCP Report. 1992;June:S1-8.
14. Fuel added to PharmD fire. Accessed at http://findarticles.com/p/ articles/mi-hb3007/is-n15-v14/ai-n28615657, July 21, 2011.
15. Buttaro M. AACP house of delegates vote: colleges to move to sole entry-level Pharm.D. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1992;49:2346-50.
16. Dresser M. UM regents OK 6-year-degree for pharmacists. Accessed at http://articles.baltimoresun.com/1992-10-31/business/1992305052-1-pharmacists- pharmacy-school-university-of-maryland, July 21, 2011.
17. Maryland General Assembly. House Bill 827: introduced February 4, 1993. Annapolis: Maryland General Assembly; 1993.
18. Maryland General Assembly. Senate Bill 692: introduced February 5, 1993. Annapolis: Maryland General Assembly; 1993.
19. Folkenflik D. Engineering, pharmacy schools at UM rise on U.S. News list. Accessed at http://articles.baltimoresun.com/1997-02-28/news/1997059067-1- hopkins-school-university-of-maryland-school-of-engineering, July 21, 2011.
20. Kirschenbaum HL. Preprofessional curriculum: is it time for another look? Am J Pharm Educ. 2010;74(8):156.
21. Traynor K. Residencies matter, stakeholders say. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2010;67:1796, 1798.