Reframing Regional Governance for Research and Practice

Urban Affairs Review

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 272-283

  Foster, Kathryn A ^a   Barnes, William R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b National League of Cities   (United States)

Author keywords

capacity; governance; regional governance; regions

Indexed keywords

GOVERNANCE APPROACH; REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84857472412     PISSN: 10780874     EISSN: 15528332     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1078087411428121     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Abbott CarlPortland: Planning, politics, and growth in a twentieth century city. Univ. of Nebraska Press; 1983:.
2. Abbott Carl. The capital of good planning: Metropolitan Portland, Oregon since 1970. The American planning tradition: Culture and policy. Fishman Robert, ed. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center and Johns Hopkins Univ. Press; 2000 1970:.
3. Barnes WilliamNation's Cities Weekly. Washington, DC: National League of Cities; 2009:.
4. Cooke Philip,Morgan KevinThe associational economy: Firms, regions and innovation. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press; 1998:.
5. Dahl Robert A.Who governs? Democracy and power in an American city. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press; 1961:.
6. Deutsch Karl W.The nerves of government: Models of political communication and control. New York: Free Press; 1963:.
7. Downs AnthonyNew visions for metropolitan America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution and Lincoln Institute of Land Policy; 1994:.
8. Reshaping the local landscape: Perspective on city county consolidation and its alternatives. Feiock RickCarr Jered, ed. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe; 2004:.
9. Foster Kathryn A. Regional capital. Urban-suburban interdependencies. Greenstein RosalindWieviel Wim, ed. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy; 2000:.
10. Foster Kathryn A.Regionalism on purpose. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy; 2001:.
11. Urban-suburban interdependencies. Greenstein RosalindWim Wiewel, ed. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy; 2000:.
12. Greer ScottMetropolitics: A study of political culture. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons; 1963:.
13. Grissom Jason A.The determinants of conflict on governing boards in public organizations: The case of California school boards.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2010;20 (3): 601-27.
14. Henry Adam DouglasLubellMarkMcCoyMichael. 2010. Belief systems and social capital as drivers of policy network structure: The case of California regional planning. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. http://jpart.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2010/08/20/jopart.muq042.abstract (accessed January 6, 2011).
15. Hooghe Marc.Why there is basically only one form of political trust.The British Journal of Politics & International Relations. 2011;13 (2): 269-75.
16. Jehn Karen A.,Mannix Elizabeth A.The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance.Academy of Management Journal. 2001;44 (2): 238-51.
17. Reflections on regionalism. Katz Bruce J., ed. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press; 2000:.
18. Kemp Roger L., ed. Regional government innovations.Jefferson, NC: MacFarland & Company; 2003:.
19. Kooiman Jan. Governing as governance.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2003:.
20. Long Norton E.The local community as an ecology of games.American Journal of Sociology. 1958;64 (3): 251-61.
21. Mason Robert J.Collaborative land use management: The quieter revolution in place-based planning. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield; 2008:.
22. McKinney Matthew J.,Johnson ShawnWorking across boundaries: People, nature, and regions. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy; 2009:.
23. Oakerson Ronald J.Governing local public economies: Creating the civic metropolis. Oakland, CA: ICS Press; 1999:.
24. O'Leary-Kelly Anne M.,Martocchio Joseph J.,Frink Dwight D.A review of the influence of group goals on group performance.Academy of Management Journal. 1994;37 (5): 1285-1301.
25. Orfield Myron. Metropolitics: A regional agenda for community and stability. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy and Brookings Institution; 1997:.
26. Pastor Manuel,Benner Chris,Matsuoka MarthaIthaca, This could be the start of something big: How social movements for metropolitan equity are reshaping metropolitan America. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press; 2009:.
27. Peirce Neal R.Johnson Curtis W.,Hall John StuartCitistates: How urban America can prosper in a competitive world. Washington, DC: Seven Locks Press; 1993:.
28. PeirceNeal. 2010. An era of federal opportunity for cities and regions?www.Citiwire.net, February13.
29. Pierre Jon,Peters B. GuyGoverning complex societies: Trajectories and scenarios. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan; 2005:.
30. Provan Keith G.,Kenis Patrick.Modes of network governance: Structure, management and effectiveness.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2008;18 (2): 229-52.
31. Metropolitan governance revisited: American/Canadian intergovernmental perspectives. Rothblatt Donald N.Sancton Andrew, ed. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press; 1998:.
32. Savitch H.V.,Vogel Ronald K.Suburbs without a city: Power and city-county consolidation.Urban Affairs Review. 2004;39 (6): 758-90.
33. StaleyWilly. 2010. Urban nation. Next American City29 (Winter). http://americancity.org/magazine/article/urban-nation/ (accessed April 15, 2011).
34. Stone Clarence.Urban regimes and the capacity to govern: A political economy approach.Journal of Urban Affairs. 1993;15 (1): 1-28.
35. Stone Clarence.Looking back to look forward: Reflections on urban regime analysis.Urban Affairs Review. 2005;40 (3): 309-41.
36. Visser James A.Understanding local government cooperation in urban regions.American Review of Public Administration. 2002;32 (1): 40-65.
37. Walker David B.Snow White and the 17 Dwarfs: From metro cooperation to governance.National Civic Review. 1987;76 (1): 14-28.
38. Warriner Charles K.The problem of organizational purpose.Sociological Quarterly. 1965;6 (3): 139-143.
39. Watson Warren E.,Kumar Kamalesh,Michaelsen Larry K. Cultural diversity's impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogenous and diverse task groups.Academy of Management Journal. 1993;36 (3): 590-602.