What can closed sets of students and their marks say?

EDM 2011 - Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Educational Data Mining

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 223-228

  Ignatov, Dmitry ^a   Mamedova, Serama ^b   Romashkin, Nikita ^b   Shamshurin, Ivan ^b  

^a University Higher School of Economics   (Russian Federation)

^b NATIONAL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY HIGHER SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGEBRAIC FRAMEWORK; APPLICATION AREA; CLOSED SET; CONCEPT LATTICES; LIFE-SCIENCES; STUDENT ASSESSMENT; STUDENT GROUPS;

DATA MINING; FORMAL CONCEPT ANALYSIS; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84857465996     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. Ganter, B. and Kuznetsov, S. O. 2001. Pattern structures and their projections. In ICCS, H. S. Delugach and G. Stumme, Eds. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Series, vol. 2120. Springer, 129-142.
2. Ganter, B. and Wille, R. 1999. Formal concept analysis: Mathematical foundations. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg.
3. Ignatov, D. I. and Kuznetsov, S. O. 2009. Frequent itemset mining for clustering near duplicate web documents. In ICCS, S. Rudolph, F. Dau, and S. O. Kuznetsov, Eds. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Series, vol. 5662. Springer, 185-200.
4. Kuznetsov, S. O. 2007. On stability of a formal concept. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 49, 1-4, 101-115.
5. Kuznetsov, S. O. and Ignatov, D. I. 2009. Concept stability for constructing taxonomies of web-site users. In Satellite Workshop "Social Network Analysis and Conceptual Structures: Exploring Opportunities" at the 5th International Conference Formal Concept Analysis (ICFCA'07), Clermont-Ferrand, France. 19-24.
6. Kuznetsov, S. O., Obiedkov, S. A., and Roth, C. 2007. Reducing the representation complexity of lattice-based taxonomies. In ICCS, U. Priss, S. Polovina, and R. Hill, Eds. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Series, vol. 4604. Springer, 241-254.
7. Roth, C., Obiedkov, S. A., and Kourie, D. G. 2006. Towards concise representation for taxonomies of epistemic communities. In CLA (2008-04-15), S. B. Yahia, E. M. Nguifo, and R. Belohlavek, Eds. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Series, vol. 4923. Springer, 240-255.
8. Stumme, G., Taouil, R., Bastide, Y., Pasquier, N., and Lakhal, L. 2002. Computing iceberg concept lattices with titanic. Data & Knowledge Engineering 42, 2, 189-222.
9. Wille, R. 1982. Restructuring lattice theory: an approach based on hierarchies of concepts. In Rival, I. (ed.): Ordered Sets. Boston, 445-470.
10. Wille, R. 1996. Conceptual structures of multicontexts. In ICCS, P. W. Eklund, G. Ellis, and G. Mann, Eds. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Series, vol. 1115. Springer, 23-39.