Process orientation through enterprise resource planning (ERP): A review of critical issues

Knowledge and Process Management

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 175-185

  Al Mashari, Majed ^a  

^a KING SAUD UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857463692     PISSN: 10924604     EISSN: 10991441     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/kpm.114     Document Type: Review

References (74)

1. Andreu R, Ricart J, Valor J. 1997. Process innovation: changing boxes or revolutionizing organizations? Knowledge and Process Management 4: No. 2, 114–125.
2. Bancroft N, Seip H, Sprengel A. 1998. Implementing SAP R/3: How to introduce a large system into a large organization. Manning Publications Co: Greenwich, CT.
3. Barnes M. 1999. Customization of ERP requires development skills. Information Week 22 Feb.
4. Barrett J. 1994. Process visualization: getting the vision right is key. Information Systems Management, Spring, 14–23.
5. Beijerse R. 1999. Questions in knowledge management: defining and conceptualising a phenomena. Journal of Knowledge Management 3: No. 2.
6. Bingi P, Sharma M, Godla J. 1999. Critical issues Affecting an ERP implementation. Information Systems Management Summer, 7–14.
7. Carr D. 1993. Managing for effective business process redesign. Cost Management Fall, 16–21.
8. Champy J. 1999. Reengineering dead? Don't believe it…︁ In Harvard Management Update. Harvard Business School: Boston, MA, March.
9. Chan R. 1999. Knowledge management for implementing ERP in SMEs. In Proceedings of the 3rd Annual SAP Asia Pacific Conference, 21–39.
10. Childe S, Maull R, Mills B. 1996. UK experience in business process re-engineering. BPRC at University of Warwick, http://bprc.warwick.ac.uk/rc-rep-9.html
11. Chung S, Snyder C. 1999. ERP initiation — a historical perspective. In Proceedings of AMCIS'99, 213–215.
12. CIO. 1996. Key roles in SAP projects. http://www.cio.com.
13. Clemons E. 1995. Using scenario analysis to manage the strategic risks of reengineering. Sloan Management Review Summer, 61–71.
14. Computer World. 1999. Challenges in ERP implementation.
15. Cooke D, Peterson W. 1998. SAP implementation: strategies and results. Research Report 1217-98-RR, The Conference Board, New York.
16. Davenport T. 1993. Process Innovation: Re-engineering Work through Information Technology. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.
17. Davenport T. 1994. The business change and re-engineering interview. Business change & Re-engineering 2: No. 1, 2–6.
18. Davenport T. 1995. Business process reengineeering: where it's been, where it's going. In Business Process Change: Re-engineering Concepts, Methods and Technologies, Grover V, Kettinger W (eds). Idea Group Publishing: London; 1–13.
19. Davenport T. 1998. Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. Harvard Business Review July-August, 121–131.
20. Davenport T, DeLong D, Beers M. 1999. Successful knowledge management projects. In The Knowledge Management Yearbook 1999–2000, Cortada J, Woods J (eds). Butterworth-Heineman: Woburn, MA.
21. Dickinson B. 1997. Knowing that the project clothes have no emperor. Knowledge and Process Management 4: No. 4, 261–267.
22. Dong L. 2000. A model for enterprise systems implementation: top management influences on implementation effectiveness. In Proceedings of AMCIS'2000, 1045–1049.
23. Donovan M. 1999. Successful ERP implementation the first time. Midrange ERP August.
24. Earl M. 1996. The risks of outsourcing IT. Sloan Management Review Spring, 26–32.
25. Earl M. 1997. Best of times, agreed. Worst, too? Information Week No. 660, 64–66.
26. Edwards H. 1999. ERP: it's not rocket science. http://www.PlanetIT.com/docs/PIT19991104S0036
27. Eriksen L, Axline S, Markus L. 1999. What happens after ‘going live’ with ERP systems? Competence centers can support effective institutionalization. In Proceedings of AMCIS'99, 776–778.
28. Ezingeard J, Chandler-Wilde R. 1999. Evaluating how ERP can provide a competitive advantage — basis for a research framework. In Proceeding of Sixth European Conference on Information Technology Evaluation, 307–313.
29. Gable G, Heever R, Erlank S, Scott J. 1997. Large packaged software: the need for research. In Proceedings of the 3rd Annual SAP Asia Pacific Conference, 381–388.
30. Gable G, Scott J, Davenport T. 1998. Cooperative ERP life-cycle knowledge management. In Proceedings of the Ninth Australasian Conference on Information Systems, 227–240.
31. Gartner Group. 1995. ERP resource planning strategic matrix. 22 February.
32. Gibbs J. 1998. Going live with SAP. The Internal Auditor 55(3): 70–75.
33. Gonzalez-Benito J, Martinez-Lorente A, Dale B. 1999. Business process re-engineering to total quality management: an examination of the issues. Business Process Management Journal 5: No. 4, 345–358.
34. Grover V, Jeong S, Kettinger W, Teng J. 1995. The implementation of business process reengineering. Journal of Management Information Systems 12: No. 1, 109–144.
35. Holland C, Light B. 1999. A critical success factors model for ERP implementation. IEEE Software May/June 30–35.
36. Industry Week. 1999. Just in case. 247(15): 28.
37. Junnarkar B, Brown C. 1999. Re-Assessing the enabling role of information technology in KM. Journal of Knowledge Management 1: No. 2, 142–148.
38. Kalakota R, Whinston A. 1997. Electronic Commerce. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
39. Keller G, Teufel T. 1998. SAP R/3 Process-Oriented Implementation. Addison-Wesley: Wokingham.
40. Koch C, Slater D, Baatz E. 1999. The ABCs of ERP. CIO; London.
41. Langenwalter G. 2000. Enterprise Resource Planning and Beyond. The St. Lucie Press: New York, NY.
42. Lieber R. 1995. Here comes SAP. Fortune 2 October, 1.
43. Lyons G. 1997. The role of information technology in enterprise re-engineering. Knowledge and Process Management 4: No. 4, 268–277.
44. Martin M, Ching R. 1999. Information technology (IT) change management. In Proceedings of AMCIS'99, 103–105.
45. McAdam R, McGreedy S. 1999. A critical review of knowledge management models. The Learning Organization 6: No. 3, 91–100.
46. Mitchell V, Zmud R. 1995. Strategy congruence and BPR rollout. In Business Process Change: Reengineering Concepts, Methods and Technologies, Grover V, Kettinger W (eds). Idea Group Publishing: London; 428–452.
47. Österle H, Fleisch E, Alt R. 2000. Business Networking. Springer: Berlin.
48. Pawlowski S, Boudreau M, Baskerville R. 1999. Constraints and flexibility in enterprise systems: a dialectic of systems and job. In Proceedings of AMCIS'99, 791–793.
49. QWL. 1994/5. Business process re-engineering: help or hindrance. No. 121, Winter 9.
50. Restivo K. 1998. Guru lauds hi-tech visions. Computer Dealer News 14: No. 27, 12.
51. Rick M. 1997. IT integration programmed for global operation. Chemical Week 159: No. 6, 21–27.
52. Rosemann M, Wiese J. 1999. Measuring the performance of ERP software — a balanced scorecard approach. In Proceedings of the Australian Conference on Information Systems, Wellington, 1–3 December.
53. Scapens R. 1998. SAP: Integrated information systems and the implications for management accountants. Management Accounting 76: No. 8, 46–48.
54. Schaaf D. 1999. Where ERP leads, training follows. Training 36: No. 5, 14–18.
55. Schneider P. 1999. Wanted: ERPeople Skills. CIO, March.
56. Scott J. 1999. The FoxMeyer drugs' bankruptcy: was it a failure of ERP? In Proceedings of AMCIS'99, 223–225.
57. Shankarnarayanan S. 1999. ERP systems — using IT to gain a competitive advantage. http://www.expressindia.com/newads/bsl/advant.htm
58. Shtub A. 1999. Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP): The Dynamic of Operations Management. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Norwell, MA.
59. Sieber M, Nah F. A recurring improvisational methodology for change management in ERP implementation. In Proceedings of AMCIS'99, 797–799.
60. Slooten K, Yap L. 1999. Implementing ERP information systems using SAP. In Proceedings of AMCIS'99, 226–228.
61. Sor R. 1999. Management reflections in relation to enterprise wide systems. In Proceedings of AMCIS'99 229–231.
62. Stevens T. 1997. Kodak focuses on ERP. Industry Week 246: No. 15, 130–135.
63. Stevens T. 1998. Proof positive. Industry Week 247(15): 22–28.
64. Sumner M. 1999. Critical success factors in enterprise wide information management systems projects. In Proceedings of AMCIS'99, 232–234.
65. Sweat J. 1998. ERP: the corporate ecosystem. Information Week 12 October.
66. Talwar R. 1993. Business re-engineering — a strategy-driven approach. Long Range Planning 26: No. 6, 22–40.
67. Tapscott D, Caston A. 1993. Paradigm Shift: The New Promise of Information Technology. McGraw-Hill: New York.
68. Taylor J. 1998. Participative design: linking BPR and SAP with an STS approach. Journal of Organizational Change Management 11: No. 3, 233–245.
69. The Center for Enterprise Systems. 2000. Enterprise resource planning systems research. http://www.git.edu
70. The Internal Auditor. 1998. SAP R/3 risks. 55: No. 3, 74.
71. Watts J. 1995. The future for BPR. Business Change & Re-engineering 2: No. 3, 2–3.
72. Welti N. 1999. Successful SAP R/3 implementation. Addison-Wesley: Wokingham.
73. Youngblood M. 1994. What you still need to know. In Corporate Reengineering Strategies for Growth, Brachel J (ed.). Research Report 1097-94-CH, The Conference Board: New York.
74. Zairi M. 1995. The integration of benchmarking and BPR: a matter of choice or necessity? Business Process Re-engineering & Management Journal 1(3): 3–9.