Analysis of the governance architecture to regulate GHG emissions from international shipping

International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 85-103

  Hackmann, Bernd ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OLDENBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Fragmentation; GHG emission reduction; Governance architecture; Institutional interplay; International environmental regimes; International shipping

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK; CLIMATE CHANGE; CLIMATE EFFECT; EMISSION CONTROL; FRAGMENTATION; GLOBAL CLIMATE; GLOBALIZATION; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; GREENHOUSE GAS; INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; KYOTO PROTOCOL; REGULATORY APPROACH; SHIPPING;

EID: 84857458186     PISSN: 15679764     EISSN: 15731553     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10784-011-9155-9     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Andresen, S. (2007). The effectiveness of UN environmental institutions. International Environmental Agreements, 7(4), 317-336.
2. Biermann, F., Betsill, M. M., Gupta, J., Kanie, N., Lebel, L., Liverman, D., et al. (2009a). Earth system governance: People, places and the planet. Science and implementation plan of the earth system governance project, ESG report 1. Bonn: IHDP.
3. Biermann, F., Pattberg, P., von Asselt, H., & Zelli, F. (2009b). The fragmentation of global governance architectures: A framework for analysis. Global Environmental Politics, 9(4), 14-40.
4. Biermann, F., & Siebenhüner, B. (2009). Managers of global change-the influence of international environmental bureaucracies. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
5. Boyle, A. (2007). Relationship between International Environmental Law and other Branches of International Law. In D. Bodansky, J. Brunnée, & E. Hey (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international environmental law. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
6. Christ, P. (2009). Greenhouse gas emission reduction potential from international shipping. OECD/ITF joint transport research centre discussion papers, 2009/11. Paris: OECD Publishing.
7. de La Fayette, L. (2001). The Marine Environment Protection Committee: The conjunction of the law of the sea and international environmental law. International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 16(2), 155-238.
8. Depledge, J. (2005). The organization of global negotiations: Constructing the climate change regime. London: Earthscan.
9. Earth Negotiations Bulletin. (2009). ENB summary report of the COP 15 in Copenhagen. http://www.iisd.ca/download/pdf/enb12459e.pdf. Accessed 25 January 2011.
10. Earth Negotiations Bulletin. (2010a). ENB compilation report of the Bonn Climate Change Talks. http://www.iisd.ca/climate/sb32/compilatione.pdf. Accessed 25 January 2011.
11. Earth Negotiations Bulletin. (2010b). ENB compilation report of the Tianjin Climate Change Talks, 2010. http://www. iisd. ca/climate/ccwg12/compilatione. pdf. Accessed 25 January 2011.
12. Eyring, V., Corbett, J.J., Lee, D.S., & Winebrake, J.J. (2007). Brief summary of the impact of ship emissions on atmospheric composition, climate, and human health. Document submitted to the Health and Environment sub-group of the International Maritime Organization on 6 November 2007. http://www.pa.op.dlr.de/~VeronikaEyring/Eyringetal_IMOBriefSummary_FINAL.pdf. Accessed 29 March 2010.
13. Eyring, V., Köhler, H.W., van Aardenne, J., & Lauer, A. (2005). Emissions from International shipping: 1. The last 50 years. Journal of Geophysical Research, 110, D17305.
14. Faber, J., Markowska, A., Eyring, V., Cionni, I., & Selstad, S. (2010). A global maritime emissions trading system-design and impacts on the shipping sector, countries and regions. Delft: CE Delft.
15. Gehring, T., & Oberthür, S. (2004). Exploring regime interaction: A framework of analysis. In A. Underdahl & O. R. Young (Eds.), Regime consequences. Methodological challenges and research strategies. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
16. Gehring, T., & Oberthür, S. (2008). Interplay: Exploring institutional interaction. In O.R. Young, L.A. King, & H. Schröder (Eds.), Institutions and environmental change: Principal findings, applications, and research frontiers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Haas, P.M., Keohane, R.O., & Levy, M.A. (1993). Institutions for the earth: Sources of effective international environmental protection. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
18. International Maritime Organization. (1958). Convention on the International Maritime Organization. London, UK: International Maritime Organization.
19. International Maritime Organization. (2004). IMO policies and practices related to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from ships. Assembly Resolution A. 963(23), IMO Assembly, 23rd session, 05 December.
20. International Maritime Organization. (2009). Second IMO GHG Study 2009. London, UK: International Maritime Organization.
21. Keohane, R.O., Levy, M.A., & Haas, P.M. (1993). The effectiveness of International Environmental Institutions. In P.M. Haas, R.O. Keohane, & M. A. Levy (Eds.), Institutions for the earth: Sources of effective international environmental protection. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
22. Keohane, R.O., & Victor, D.G. (2010). The regime complex for climate change. Discussion Paper 2010-33. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Project on International Climate Agreements.
23. Krasner, S.D. (1983). Structural causes and regime consequences. Regimes as intervening variables. In S. D. Krasner (Ed.), International regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
24. Marine Environment Protection Committee. (2008a). Report of the Marine Environment Protection Committee of its fifty-eighth Session. MEPC, 58th session, 16 October 2008. MEPC 58/23.
25. Marine Environment Protection Committee. (2008b). Legal aspects of IMO work on GHG. MEPC, 58th session, 16 October 2008. MEPC 58/4/20.
26. Marine Environment Protection Committee. (2009). Prevention of air pollution from ships: Comments on MEPC 59/4/8 and 59/4/9 relating to the Energy Efficiency Design Index, the Ship Energy Management Plan and possible market-based instruments. Submitted by Intertanko. MEPC, 59th session, 9 April 2009. MEPC 59/4/43.
27. Marine Environment Protection Committee. (2010a). Prevention of air pollution from ships: Control of greenhouse gas emissions from international maritime transport. Submitted by International Chamber of Shipping. MEPC, 60th session, 15 January 2010. MEPC 60/4/13.
28. Marine Environment Protection Committee. (2010b). Prevention of air pollution from ships: Emission caps and reduction targets. Submitted by World Shipping Council. MEPC, 60th session, 15 January 2010. MEPC 60/4/28.
29. Marine Environment Protection Committee. (2010c). Report of the Marine Environment Protection Committee of its sixty-first Session. MEPC, 61th session, 06 October 2010. MEPC 61/24.
30. Marine Environment Protection Committee. (2010d). Full report of the work undertaken by the expert group on feasibility study and impact assessment of possible market-based measures. MEPC, 61th session, 13 August 2010. MEPC 61/INF. 2.
31. Miles, E. L., Underdal, A., Andresen, S., Wettestad, J., Skjærseth, J. B., & Carlin, E. M. (2002). Environmental regime effectiveness: Confronting theory with evidence. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
32. Miola, A., Ciuffo, B., Marra, M., & Giovine, E. (2010). Analytical framework to regulate air emissions from maritime transport. JRC Technical Report. European Commission, Joint Research Center, Institute for Environment and Sustainability. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
33. Oberthür, S. (2003). Institutional interaction to address greenhouse gas emissions from international transport: ICAO, IMO and the Kyoto Protocol. Climate Policy, 3(3), 191-205.
34. Roe, M. (2007). Shipping, policy and multi-level governance. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 9(1), 84-103.
35. Siebenhuener, B., & Suplie, J. (2005). Implementing the access and benefit-sharing provisions of the CBD: A case for institutional learning. Ecological Economics, 53, 507-522.
36. Siebenhüner, B. (2008). Learning in international organizations in global environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics, 8(4), 92-116.
37. Stokke, O. (2001). The interplay of international regimes: Putting effectiveness theory to work? FNI Report 10/2001. Lysaker: The Fridtjof Nansen Institute.
38. Study Group on the Fragmentation of International Law. (2006). Conclusions of the work of the study group on the fragmentation of international law: Difficulties arising from the diversification and expansion of international law. Geneva: United Nations.
39. UNCLOS. (1982). United Nations convention on the law of the sea. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations.
40. UNCTAD. (2009). Review of maritime transport 2009. New York/Geneva: United Nations Publication.
41. Underdal, A. (2002a). One question, two answers. In E. L. Miles, A. Underdal, S. Andresen, J. Wettestad, J. B. Skjærseth, & E. M. Carlin (Eds.), Environmental regime effectiveness: Confronting theory with evidence. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
42. Underdal, A. (2002b). Patterns of regime effectiveness. In E. L. Miles, A. Underdal, S. Andresen, J. Wettestad, J. B. Skjærseth, & E. M. Carlin (Eds.), Environmental regime effectiveness: Confronting theory with evidence. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
43. Underdal, A. (2008). Determining the causal significance of institutions: Accomplishments and challenges. In O. R. Young, L. A. King, & H. Schröder (Eds.), Institutions and environmental change: Principal findings, applications, and research frontiers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
44. UNFCCC. (1992). United Nations framework convention on climate change. Geneva: United Nations.
45. UNFCCC. (1998). The Kyoto protocol to the United Nations framework convention on climate change. Bonn: United Nations.
46. UNFCCC. (2009a). Ad hoc working group on long-term cooperative action under the convention-negotiating text. FCCC/AWGLCA/2009/8. Bonn: United Nations.
47. UNFCCC. (2009b). Ad hoc working group on long-term cooperative action under the convention-revised negotiating text. FCCC/AWGLCA/2009/INF. 1. Bonn: United Nations.
48. UNFCCC. (2009c). Report of the ad hoc working group on long-term cooperative action under the convention on its eighth session, held in Copenhagen from 7 to 15 December 2009. FCCC/AWGLCA/2009/17. Bonn: United Nations.
49. UNFCCC. (2010). Ad hoc working group on long-term cooperative action under the convention-negotiating text. FCCC/AWGLCA/2010/14. Bonn: United Nations.
50. Yamin, F., & Depledge, J. (2004). The international climate change regime: A guide to rules, institutions and procedures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51. Young, O. R. (1996). Institutional linkages in international societies: Polar perspectives. Global Governance, 2(1), 1-23.
52. Young, O. R. (1999). Regime effectiveness: Taking stock. In O. R. Young (Ed.), The effectiveness of international environmental regimes: Causal connections and behavioral mechanisms. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
53. Young, O.R. (2002). The institutional dimension of environmental change: Fit, interplay, and scale. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
54. Young, O.R. (2008). Institutions and environmental change: The scientific legacy of a decade of IDGEC research. In O.R. Young, L.A. King, & H. Schröder (Eds.), Institutions and environmental change: Principal findings, applications, and research frontiers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
55. Young, O. R., Aggarwal, A., King, L. A., Sand, P. H., Underdal, A., & Wasson, M. (1999/2005). Institutional dimensions of global environmental change-(IDGEC): Science plan. IHDP Report (9). Bonn: The International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change.