A comparative study of using non-hip bone density inputs with FRAX®

Osteoporosis International

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 853-860

  Leslie, W D ^a,f   Lix, L M ^b   Johansson, H ^c   Oden, A ^c   McCloskey, E ^d   Kanis, J A ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

^c Northern General Hospital ^*

^d NORTHERN GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^f ST BONIFACE GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Bone mineral density; Clinical risk factors; Fracture prediction; FRAX ; Osteoporosis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK; FRAGILITY FRACTURE; HUMAN; LUMBAR SPINE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; AGED; ALGORITHMS; BONE DENSITY; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MANITOBA; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOPOROSIS; OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES; PATIENT SELECTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84857444387     PISSN: 0937941X     EISSN: 14332965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-011-1814-8     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. JA Kanis LJ Melton III C Christiansen, et al. 1994 The diagnosis of osteoporosis J Bone Miner Res 9 1137 1141 7976495 10.1002/jbmr.5650090802 1:STN:280:DyaK2M%2FmslSisA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 24985932)
2. AC Looker HW Wahner WL Dunn, et al. 1998 Updated data on proximal femur bone mineral levels of US adults Osteoporos Int 8 468 489 9850356 10.1007/s001980050093 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FmslensA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 28486716)
3. JA Kanis EV McCloskey H Johansson, et al. 2008 A reference standard for the description of osteoporosis Bone 42 467 475 18180210 10.1016/j.bone.2007.11. 001 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXitVOmtbk%3D
4. ES Siris YT Chen TA Abbott, et al. 2004 Bone mineral density thresholds for pharmacological intervention to prevent fractures Arch Intern Med 164 1108 1112 15159268 10.1001/archinte.164.10.1108 (Pubitemid 38668990)
5. A Cranney SA Jamal JF Tsang, et al. 2007 Low bone mineral density and fracture burden in postmenopausal women CMAJ. 177 575 580 17846439 10.1503/cmaj.070234 (Pubitemid 47437054)
6. JA Kanis A Oden O Johnell, et al. 2007 The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women Osteoporos Int 18 1033 1046 17323110 10.1007/s00198-007-0343-y 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2sznvV2hug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 47020000)
7. JA Kanis A Oden H Johansson, et al. 2009 FRAX and its applications to clinical practice Bone 44 734 743 19195497 10.1016/j.bone.2009.01.373
8. WD Leslie L MacWilliam L Lix, et al. 2005 A population-based study of osteoporosis testing and treatment following introduction of a new bone densitometry service Osteoporos Int 16 773 782 15580480 10.1007/s00198-004-1756- 5 (Pubitemid 40941013)
9. WD Leslie PA Caetano LR MacWilliam, et al. 2005 Construction and validation of a population-based bone densitometry database J Clin Densitom 8 25 30 15722584 10.1385/JCD:8:1:025 (Pubitemid 40392924)
10. N Binkley GM Kiebzak EM Lewiecki, et al. 2005 Recalculation of the NHANES database SD improves T-score agreement and reduces osteoporosis prevalence J Bone Miner Res 20 195 201 15647812 10.1359/JBMR.041115
11. KE Hansen N Binkley R Christian, et al. 2005 Interobserver reproducibility of criteria for vertebral body exclusion J Bone Miner Res 20 501 508 15746996 10.1359/JBMR.041134 (Pubitemid 40293499)
12. WD Leslie 2006 The importance of spectrum bias on bone density monitoring in clinical practice Bone 39 361 368 16537116 10.1016/j.bone.2006.02.002 (Pubitemid 43851370)
13. NP Roos E Shapiro 1999 Revisiting the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy and Evaluation and its population-based health information system Med Care 37 JS10 JS14 10409002 10.1097/00005650-199906001-00005 1:STN:280: DyaK1MzhsVOjtQ%3D%3D
14. WD Leslie JF Tsang PA Caetano, et al. 2007 Effectiveness of bone density measurement for predicting osteoporotic fractures in clinical practice J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92 77 81 17032716 10.1210/jc.2006-1415 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD2sXpsVGqsQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 46067512)
15. WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology (eds) (2005) Guidelines for ATC classification and DDD assignment. Oslo
16. WD Leslie LM Lix H Johansson, et al. 2010 Independent clinical validation of a Canadian FRAX tool: fracture prediction and model calibration J Bone Miner Res 25 2350 2358 20499367 10.1002/jbmr.123
17. WD Leslie C Berger L Langsetmo, et al. 2011 Construction and validation of a simplified fracture risk assessment tool for Canadian women and men: results from the CaMos and Manitoba cohorts Osteoporos Int 22 1873 1883 20967422 10.1007/s00198-010-1445-5 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXlvFWitLs%3D
18. LA Fraser L Langsetmo C Berger, et al. 2011 Fracture prediction and calibration of a Canadian FRAX(R) tool: a population-based report from CaMos Osteoporos Int 22 829 837 21161508 10.1007/s00198-010-1465-1
19. JA Kanis O Johnell A Oden, et al. 2000 Long-term risk of osteoporotic fracture in Malmo Osteoporos Int 11 669 674 11095169 10.1007/s001980070064 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FlsFarsw%3D%3D
20. WD Leslie LM Lix H Johansson, et al. 2011 Spine-hip discordance and fracture risk assessment: a physician-friendly FRAX enhancement Osteoporos Int 22 839 847 20959961 10.1007/s00198-010-1461-5 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3M7ntlShtQ%3D%3D
21. B Dawson-Hughes 2008 A revised clinician's guide to the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93 2463 2465 18544615 10.1210/jc.2008-0926 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXoslyktLs%3D (Pubitemid 352008504)
22. B Dawson-Hughes AN Tosteson LJ Melton III, et al. 2008 Implications of absolute fracture risk assessment for osteoporosis practice guidelines in the USA Osteoporos Int 19 449 458 18292975 10.1007/s00198-008-0559-5 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1c7nvF2nsQ%3D%3D
23. K Siminoski WD Leslie H Frame, et al. 2005 Recommendations for bone mineral density reporting in Canada Can Assoc Radiol J 56 178 188 16144280 (Pubitemid 41133860)
24. A Papaioannou S Morin AM Cheung, et al. 2010 2010 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: summary CMAJ. 182 1864 1873 20940232 10.1503/cmaj.100771
25. NR Cook 2007 Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction Circulation 115 928 935 17309939 10.1161/ CIRCULATIONAHA.106.672402 (Pubitemid 46294733)
26. MJ Pencina RB D'Agostino Sr RB D'Agostino Jr, et al. 2008 Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond Stat Med 27 157 172 17569110 10.1002/sim.2929 (Pubitemid 351193639)
27. JA Kanis D Hans C Cooper, et al. 2011 Interpretation and use of FRAX in clinical practice Osteoporos Int 22 2395 2411 21779818 10.1007/s00198-011-1713-z 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3MjjvVajsA%3D%3D
28. DB Hans JA Kanis S Baim, et al. 2011 Joint Official Positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and International Osteoporosis Foundation on FRAX((R)) Executive Summary of the 2010 Position Development Conference on Interpretation and Use of FRAX((R)) in Clinical Practice J Clin Densitom 14 171 180 21810521 10.1016/j.jocd.2011.05.007
29. WD Leslie LM Lix Manitoba Bone DensityProgram 2011 Effects of FRAX® model calibration on intervention rates: a simulation study J Clin Densitom 14 272 278 21723769 10.1016/j.jocd.2011.03.007