Discriminative value of FRAX for fracture prediction in a cohort of Chinese postmenopausal women

Osteoporosis International

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 871-878

  Cheung, E Y N ^a   Bow, C H ^b   Cheung, C L ^b,c   Soong, C ^b   Yeung, S ^b   Loong, C ^b   Kung, A ^b  

^a UNITED CHRISTIAN HOSPITAL   (Hong Kong)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Chinese postmenopausal women; Discriminative value; Ethnic specific clinic risk factors; Fracture prediction; FRAX; Osteoporotic fracture

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; CHINESE; COHORT ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; ETHNICITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FRACTURE; FRAGILITY FRACTURE; HIP FRACTURE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; POSTMENOPAUSE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; ASIAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; BONE DENSITY; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK; HIP FRACTURES; HONG KONG; HUMANS; LIFE STYLE; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOPOROSIS, POSTMENOPAUSAL; OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84857440529     PISSN: 0937941X     EISSN: 14332965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-011-1647-5     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. G Ioannidis A Papaioannou WM Hopman A-D Noori A Tassos L Pickard CC Kennedy JC Prior WP Olszynski KS Davison D Goltzman L Thabane G Amiran E Papadimitropoulos J Brown R Josse D Hanley JD Adachi 2009 Relation between fractures and mortality: results from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study CMAJ1 81 265 270 10.1503/cmaj.081720
2. O Johnell JA Kanis 2006 An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures Osteoporos Int 17 1726 1733 16983459 10.1007/s00198-006-0172-4 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28nitVSksQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 44607392)
3. SC Schuit M van der Klift AE Weel CE de Laet H Burger E Seeman A Hofman AG Uitterlinden JP van Leeuwen HA Pols 2004 Fracture incidence and association with bone mineral density in elderly men and women: the Rotterdam Study Bone 34 195 202 14751578 10.1016/j.bone.2003.10.001 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c%2FltVCjsg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 38142449)
4. KL Stone DG Seeley LY Lui JA Cauley K Ensrud WS Browner MC Nevitt SR Cummings Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group 2003 BMD at multiple sites and risk of fracture of multiple types: long-term results from the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures J Bone Miner Res 18 1947 1954 14606506 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.11.1947 (Pubitemid 37377443)
5. SA Wainwright LM Marshall KE Ensrud JA Cauley DM Black TA Hillier MC Hochberg MT Vogt ES Orwoll Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group 2005 Hip fracture in women without osteoporosis J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90 2787 2793 15728213 10.1210/jc.2004-1568 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXkt1Wgtrk%3D (Pubitemid 40686325)
6. JA Kanis O Johnell A Oden C De Laet B Jonsson A Dawson 2002 Ten-year risk of osteoporotic fracture and the effect of risk factors on screening strategies Bone 30 251 258 11792594 10.1016/S8756-3282(01)00653-6 1:STN:280: DC%2BD38%2FmvVWmug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 34044325)
7. ND Nguyen SA Frost JR Center JA Eisman TV Nguyen 2007 Development of a nomogram for individualizing hip fracture risk in men and women Osteoporos Int 18 1109 1117 17370100 10.1007/s00198-007-0362-8 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2svmtlaiuw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 47020008)
8. FA Trémollieres JM Pouillès N Drewniak J Laparra CA Ribot P Dargent-Molina 2010 Fracture risk prediction using BMD and clinical risk factors in early postmenopausal women: sensitivity of the WHO FRAX tool J Bone Miner Res May 25 5 1002 1009 10.1002/jbmr.12
9. C Cooper LJ Melton 1992 Hip fractures in the elderly: a world-wide projection Osteoporos Int 2 285 289 1421796 10.1007/BF01623184 1:STN:280:DyaK3s%2Fktlyrtw%3D%3D
10. CS Colón-Emeric KW Lyles 2009 Should there be a fracas over FRAX and other fracture prediction tools?: Comment on "A comparison of prediction models for fractures in older women" Arch Intern Med 169 22 2094 2095 20008692 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.2094
11. ND Nguyen SA Frost JR Center JA Eisman TV Nguyen 2008 Development of prognostic nomograms for individualizing 5-year and 10-year fracture risks Osteoporos Int 19 1431 1444 18324342 10.1007/s00198-008-0588-0 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1crnvVehtw%3D%3D
12. J Hippisley-Cox C Coupland 2009 Predicting risk of osteoporotic fracture in men and women in England and Wales: prospective derivation and validation of QFractureScores BMJ 339 b4229
13. JP van den Bergh TA van Geel WF Lems PP Geusens 2010 Assessment of individual fracture risk: FRAX and beyond Curr Osteoporos Rep 8 3 131 137
14. A Oden O Johnell H Johansson C De Laet J Brown P Burckhardt C Cooper C Christiansen S Cummings JA Eisman S Fujiwara C Glüer D Goltzman D Hans MA Krieg A La Croix E McCloskey D Mellstrom LJ Melton 3rd H Pols J Reeve K Sanders AM Schott A Silman D Torgerson T van Staa NB Watts N Yoshimura 2007 The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women Osteoporos Int 18 8 1033 1046 17323110 10.1007/s00198-007-0343-y (Pubitemid 47020000)
15. KE Ensrud LY Lui BC Taylor JT Schousboe MG Donaldson HA Fink JA Cauley TA Hillier WS Browner SR Cummings Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group 2009 A comparison of prediction models for fractures in older women: is more better? Arch Intern Med 169 22 2087 2094 20008691 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.404
16. AWC Kung KK Lee AYY Ho G Tang KDK Luk 2007 Ten-year risk of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal Chinese women according to clinical risk factors and BMD T-scores: a prospective study J Bone Miner Res 22 7 1080 1087 17371165 10.1359/jbmr.070320 (Pubitemid 351339730)
17. J Mei SSC Yeung AWC Kung 2001 High dietary phytoestrogen intake is associated with higher bone mineral density in postmenopausal but not premenopausal women J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 86 5217 5221 11701680 10.1210/jc.86.11.5217 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXos1Kqs7w%3D (Pubitemid 33070238)
18. AWC Kung KDK Luk LW Chu GWK Tang 1999 Quantitative ultrasound and symptomatic vertebral fracture risk in Chinese women Osteoporos Int 10 456 461 10663345 10.1007/s001980050254 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7ltlaqsQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 30029011)
19. Lachin JM (2000) Biostatistical methods: The assessment of relative risks. Wiley, New York
20. DD Dorfman KS Berbaum CE Metz 1992 Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method Invest Radiol 27 9 723 731 1399456 10.1097/00004424- 199209000-00015 1:STN:280:DyaK3s%2FhsVOksg%3D%3D
21. MG Donaldson L Palermo JT Schousboe KE Ensrud MC Hochberg SR Cummings 2009 FRAX and risk of vertebral fractures: the fracture intervention trial J Bone Miner Res 24 11 1793 1799 19419318 10.1359/jbmr.090511
22. SD Berry L Ngo EJ Samelson DP Kiel 2010 Competing risk of death: an important consideration in studies of older adults J Am Geriatr Soc 58 4 783 787 20345862 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02767.x