Hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation via direct laryngoscopy and intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG)

Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 100-104

  Akhlagh, Seyd Hedayatallah ^a   Vaziri, Mohammad Taghy Moeen ^a   Masoumi, Tooran ^a   Anbardan, Sanam Javid ^b  

^a SHIRAZ UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^b TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Coronary artery by pass grafting (CABG); Hemodynamic stress response; Intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA); Intubation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857409795     PISSN: 05440440     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Kihara S, Brimacombe J, Yaguchi Y, Watanabe S, Taguchi N, Komatsuzaki T: Hemodynamic responses among three tracheal intubation devices in normotensive and hypertensive patients. Anesth Analg; 2003, 96:890-5.
2. Burney RG, Winn R: Increased cerebrospinal fluid pressure during laryngoscopy and intubation for induction of anesthesia. Anesth Analg; 1975, 54:687-90.
3. Kahl M, Eberhart LH, Behnke H, Sänger S, Schwarz U, Vogt S, Moosdorf R, Wulf H, Geldner G: Stress response to tracheal intubation in patients undergoing cronary artery surgery: direct laryngoscopy versus an intubating laryngeal mask airway. J Cardiothorac Vasc Aneth; 2004, 18:275-80.
4. Noor Zairul M, Khairul Faizi A: Comparison of the VBM laryngeal tube and laryngeal mask airway for ventilation during manual inline neck stabilisation. Singapore Med J; 2006, 47:892-6.
5. Fox EJ, Sklar CS, Hill CH, Villanueva R, King BD: Complication related to the pressor response to endotracheal intubation. Anesthesiology; 1977,47:524-5.
6. Forbes AM, Dally FG: Acute hypertension during induction of anaesthesia and endotracheal intubation in normotensive man. Br J Anaesth; 1970, 42:618-24.
7. Shribman AJ, Smith G, Achola KJ: Cardiovascular and catecholamine responses to laryngoscopy with and without tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth; 1987, 59:295-9.
8. Bucx MJ, Scheck PA, Van Geel RT, Den Ouden AH, Niesing R: Measurement of forces during laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia; 1992, 47:348-51.
9. Joo HS, Rose DK: The intubating laryngeal mask airway with and without fiberoptic guidance. Anesth Analg; 1999, 88:662-6.
10. Brain AI, Verghese C, Addy EV, Kapila A: The intubating laryngeal mask. I. Development of a new device for intubation of the trachea. Br J Anaesth; 1997, 79:699-703.
11. Brimacombe J: The advantages of the LMA over the tracheal tube or facemask; a meta- analysis. Can J Anaesth; 1995, 42:1017-23.
12. Wood MLB, Forrest ETS: The haemodynamic response to the insertion of the laryngeal mask airway; a comparison with laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 1994, 38:510-3.
13. Choyce A, Avidan MS, Harvey A, Patel C, Timberlake C, Sarang K, Tilbrook L: The cardiovascular response to insertion of the intubating laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia; 2002, 57:330-3.
14. Siddiqui NT, Khan FH: Hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation via intubating laryngeal mask airway versus direct laryngoscopic tracheal intubation. J Pak Med Assoc; 2007, 57:11-4.