Instructor feedback versus no instructor feedback on performance in a laparoscopic virtual reality simulator: A randomized educational trial

BMC Medical Education

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Oestergaard, Jeanett ^a   Bjerrum, Flemming ^b   Maagaard, Mathilde ^a   Winkel, Per ^c   Larsen, Christian Rifbjerg ^b   Ringsted, Charlotte ^a   Gluud, Christian ^c   Grantcharov, Teodor ^d   Ottesen, Bent ^a   Soerensen, Jette Led ^a  

^a Rigshospitalet   (Denmark)

^b HILLERØD HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^d TORONTO WESTERN HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Feedback; Laparoscopy; Salpingectomy; Training; Virtual reality simulation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENMARK; EDUCATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL SCHOOL; MEDICAL STUDENT; METHODOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REFERENCE VALUE; SALPINGECTOMY; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENMARK; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FACULTY, MEDICAL; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; REFERENCE VALUES; SALPINGECTOMY; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84857403056     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726920     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-7     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Proving the effectiveness of virtual reality simulation for training in laparoscopic surgery. Aggarwal R, Ward J, Balasundaram I, Sains P, Athanasiou T, Darzi A, Ann Surg 2007 246 771 779 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3180f61b09 17968168 (Pubitemid 350035653)
2. Proficiency-based virtual reality training significantly reduces the error rate for residents during their first 10 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Ahlberg G, Enochsson L, Gallagher AG, Hedman L, Hogman C, McClusky DA III, et al. Am J Surg 2007 193 797 804 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.06.050 17512301 (Pubitemid 46733889)
3. Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Grantcharov TP, Kristiansen VB, Bendix J, Bardram L, Rosenberg J, Funch-Jensen P, Br J Surg 2004 91 146 150 14760660 (Pubitemid 38233958)
4. Effect of virtual reality training on laparoscopic surgery: randomised controlled trial. Larsen CR, Soerensen JL, Grantcharov TP, Dalsgaard T, Schouenborg L, Ottosen C, et al. BMJ 2009 338 1802 10.1136/bmj.b1802 19443914
5. Integration of laparoscopic virtual-reality simulation into gynaecology training. Burden C, Oestergaard J, Larsen CR, BJOG 2011 118 Suppl 3 5 10 22039886
6. Validation and implementation of surgical simulators: a critical review of present, past, and future. Schout BM, Hendrikx AJ, Scheele F, Bemelmans BL, Scherpbier AJ, Surg Endosc 2010 24 536 546 10.1007/s00464-009-0634-9 19633886
7. The formula for a successful laparoscopic skills curriculum. Stefanidis D, Heniford BT, Arch Surg 2009 144 77 82 10.1001/archsurg.2008.528 19153329
8. A competency-based virtual reality training curriculum for the acquisition of laparoscopic psychomotor skill. Aggarwal R, Grantcharov T, Moorthy K, Hance J, Darzi A, Am J Surg 2006 191 128 133 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005. 10.014 16399123 (Pubitemid 43042537)
9. Laparoscopic virtual reality training: are 30 repetitions enough? Brunner WC, Korndorffer JR Jr, Sierra R, Massarweh NN, Dunne JB, Yau CL, et al. J Surg Res 2004 122 150 156 10.1016/j.jss.2004.08.006 15555611 (Pubitemid 39535936)
10. Virtual reality simulation for the operating room: proficiency-based training as a paradigm shift in surgical skills training. Gallagher AG, Ritter EM, Champion H, Higgins G, Fried MP, Moses G, et al. Ann Surg 2005 241 364 372 10.1097/01.sla.0000151982.85062.80 15650649
11. Proficiency-based laparoscopic and endoscopic training with virtual reality simulators: a comparison of proctored and independent approaches. Snyder CW, Vandromme MJ, Tyra SL, Hawn MT, J Surg Educ 2009 66 201 207 10.1016/j.jsurg.2009.07.007 19896624
12. Self-controlled observational practice enhances learning. Wulf G, Raupach M, Pfeiffer F, Res Q Exerc Sport 2005 76 107 111 15810775 (Pubitemid 40353923)
13. Motor skill learning and performance: a review of influential factors. Wulf G, Shea C, Lewthwaite R, Med Educ 2010 44 75 84 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009. 03421.x 20078758
14. How effective is self-guided learning of clinical technical skills? It's all about process. Brydges R, Carnahan H, Safir O, Dubrowski A, Med Educ 2009 43 507 515 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03329.x 19493173
15. Objective assessment of gynecologic laparoscopic skills using the LapSimGyn virtual reality simulator. Larsen CR, Grantcharov T, Aggarwal R, Tully A, Sorensen JL, Dalsgaard T, et al. Surg Endosc 2006 20 1460 1466 10.1007/s00464-005-0745-x 16823649 (Pubitemid 44451264)
16. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Holm S, Scand J Statist 1979 6 65 70
17. Unsupervised virtual reality training may not increase laparoscopic suturing skills. Halvorsen FH, Fosse E, Mjaland O, Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2011 21 458 461 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31823bdf0c 22146172
18. The use of simulation to teach clinical skills in obstetrics. Cass GK, Crofts JF, Draycott TJ, Semin Perinatol 2011 35 68 73 10.1053/j.semperi.2011.01. 005 21440813
19. Theoretical foundations of learning through simulation. Zigmont JJ, Kappus LJ, Sudikoff SN, Semin Perinatol 2011 35 47 51 10.1053/j.semperi.2011.01. 002 21440810
20. Effects of simulation versus traditional tutorial-based training on physiologic stress levels among clinicians: a pilot study. Bong CL, Lightdale JR, Fredette ME, Weinstock P, Simul Healthc 2010 5 272 278 10.1097/SIH. 0b013e3181e98b29 21330809
21. Threat and challenge: cognitive appraisal and stress responses in simulated trauma resuscitations. Harvey A, Nathens AB, Bandiera G, Leblanc VR, Med Educ 2010 44 587 594 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03634.x 20604855
22. A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003-2009. McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Petrusa ER, Scalese RJ, Med Educ 2010 44 50 63 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03547.x 20078756
23. Self-controlled feedback is effective if it is based on the learner's performance. Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G, Res Q Exerc Sport 2005 76 42 48 15810769 (Pubitemid 40353917)
24. Extent of innate dexterity and ambidexterity across handedness and gender: implications for training in laparoscopic surgery. Elneel FH, Carter F, Tang B, Cuschieri A, Surg Endosc 2008 22 31 37 10.1007/s00464-007-9533-0 17965919
25. Impact of hand dominance, gender, and experience with computer games on performance in virtual reality laparoscopy. Grantcharov TP, Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Rosenberg J, Surg Endosc 2003 17 1082 1085 10.1007/s00464-002- 9176-0 12728373 (Pubitemid 36808103)
26. Can we continue to ignore gender differences in performance on simulation trainers? Thorson CM, Kelly JP, Forse RA, Turaga KK, J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2011 21 329 333 10.1089/lap.2010.0368 21563940