Cuspal deflection and depth of cure in resin-based composite restorations filled by using bulk, incremental and transtooth-illumination techniques

Journal of the American Dental Association

Volumn 142, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 1176-1182

  Campodonico, Carlos E ^a   Tantbirojn, Daranee ^b   Olin, Paul S ^a   Versluis, Antheunis ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Bulk; Composite; Cure; Cuspal flexure; Hardness; Increment; Transtooth illumination

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; FILTEK SUPREME PLUS; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; RESIN; X TRA FIL COMPOSITE RESIN; X-TRA FIL COMPOSITE RESIN;

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HARDNESS; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; PHOTOCHEMISTRY; PLIABILITY; POLYMERIZATION; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH CROWN; YOUNG MODULUS;

BIOMECHANICS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; ELASTIC MODULUS; HARDNESS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; PHOTOCHEMICAL PROCESSES; PLIABILITY; POLYMERIZATION; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH CROWN; TRANSILLUMINATION;

EID: 84857382422     PISSN: 00028177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0087     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ, Feilzer A. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 1984;63(12):1396-1399.
2. Letzel H. Survival rates and reasons for failure of posterior composite restorations in multicentre clinical trial. J Dent 1989; 17(suppl 1):S10-S17.
3. Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. J Dent 1997; 25(6):435-440.
4. Loguercio AD, Reis A, Schroeder M, Balducci I, Versluis A, Ballester RY. Polymerization shrinkage: effects of boundary conditions and filling technique of resin composite restorations. J Dent 2004; 32(6):459-470.
5. Tantbirojn D, Versluis A, Pintado M, DeLong R, Douglas W. Tooth deformation patterns in molars after composite restoration. Dent Mater 2004;20(6):535-542.
6. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 1987; 66(11):1636-1639.
7. Giachetti L, Scaminaci Russo D, Bambi C, Grandini R. A review of polymerization shrinkage stress: current techniques for posterior direct resin restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006;7(4):79-88.
8. Versluis A, Douglas WH, Cross M, Sakaguchi RL. Does an incremental filling technique reduce polymerization shrinkage stresses? J Dent Res 1996;75(3):871-878.
9. Abbas G, Fleming GJ, Harrington E, Shortall AC, Burke FJ. Cuspal movement and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with a packable composite cured in bulk or in increments. J Dent 2003; 31(6):437-444.
10. Idriss S, Habib C, Abduljabbar T, Omar R. Marginal adaptation of class II resin composite restorations using incremental and bilk placement techniques: an ESEM study. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30(10): 1000-1007.
11. Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Douglas W. Do dental composite always shrink toward the light? J Dent Res 1998;77(6):1435-1445.
12. Belvedere PC. Contemporary posterior direct composites using state-of-the-art techniques. Dent Clin North Am 2001;45(1):49-70.
13. Lazarchik DA, Hammond BD, Sikes CL, Looney SW, Rueggeberg FA. Hardness comparison of bulk-filled/transtooth and incrementalfilled/occlusally irradiated composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 98(2):129-140.
14. Amaral CM, de Castro AKBB, Pimenta LAF, Ambrosano GMB. Influence of resin composite polymerization techniques on micro - leakage and microhardness. Quintessence Int 2002;33(9):685-689.
15. Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Lee MS, Tu LS, DeLong R. Can hygroscopic expansion compensate polymerization shrinkage? Part I: deformation of restored teeth (published online ahead of print Oct. 20, 2010). Dent Mater 2011;27(2):126-133. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2010.09.007.
16. Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, DeLong R. Coronal deformation in premolars restored with low-shrink composites (abstract 3064). J Dent Res 2010;89(special issue B).
17. DeLong R, Pintado MR, Douglas WH. Measurement of change in surface contour by computer graphics. Dent Mater 1985;1(1):27-30.
18. Ferracane JL. Correlation between hardness and degree of conversion during the setting reaction of unfilled dental restorative resins. Dent Mater 1985;1(1):11-14.
19. Rueggeberg FA, Craig RG. Correlation of parameters used to estimate monomer conversion in a light-cured composite. J Dent Res 1988;67(6):932-937.
20. Santos GB, Medeiros IS, Fellows CE, Muench A, Braga RR. Composite depth of cure obtained with QTH and LED units assessed by microhardness and micro-Raman spectroscopy. Oper Dent 2007; 32(1):79-83.
21. Bouschlicher MR, Rueggeberg FA, Wilson BM. Correlation of bottom-to-top surface microhardness and conversion ratios for a variety of resin composite compositions. Oper Dent 2004;29(6):698-704.
22. Cheng Y-S, Douglas WH. Standardized conditions for hardnesselastic modulus conversions (abstract 2342). J Dent Res 1999; 78(special issue):398.