|
Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 255-260
|
A retrospective wound review of standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Is there need for single-port laparoscopic surgery?
|
Author keywords
Cholecystectomy; Cosmesis; Laparoscopic; Satisfaction; Single incision
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
CHOLECYSTECTOMY;
ESTHETICS;
FEMALE;
FOUR PORT CHOLECYSTECTOMY;
HEALTH CARE SURVEY;
HOSPITAL HYGIENE;
HUMAN;
LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SINGLE SITE SURGERY;
LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MALE;
MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW;
PATIENT SATISFACTION;
POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION;
POSTOPERATIVE PAIN;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
QUESTIONNAIRE;
REVIEW;
SURGICAL APPROACH;
SURGICAL WOUND;
UMBILICUS;
WOUND ASSESSMENT;
AGED;
ARTICLE;
METHODOLOGY;
MIDDLE AGED;
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;
WOUND CLOSURE;
ADULT;
AGED;
CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC;
HUMANS;
MIDDLE AGED;
PATIENT SATISFACTION;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
WOUND CLOSURE TECHNIQUES;
YOUNG ADULT;
|
EID: 84857382343
PISSN: 09302794
EISSN: 14322218
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1863-2 Document Type: Review |
Times cited : (18)
|
References (11)
|