Reply to: Doi:10.1007/s00464-009-0765-z: Laparoscopic correction of perforated peptic ulcer: First choice? A review of literature

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 288-

  Bertleff, Marietta ^a   Lange, Johan ^a  

^a Xpert Hand and Wrist Clinic   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOEY SCORE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LETTER; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NETHERLANDS; PNEUMOPERITONEUM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SCORING SYSTEM; TREATMENT CONTRAINDICATION; ULCER PERFORATION; DUODENUM ULCER; LAPAROSCOPY; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; STOMACH ULCER;

DUODENAL ULCER; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; PEPTIC ULCER PERFORATION; STOMACH ULCER;

EID: 84857380020     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1868-x     Document Type: Letter

References (3)

1. Loshiriwat V, Prapasrivorakul S, Loshiriwat D (2009) Perforated peptic ulcer: clinical presentation, surgical outcomes, and the accuracy of the obey scoring system in predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality. World J Surg 33:80-85
2. Lunevicius R, Morkevicius M (2005) Comparison of laparoscopic vs open repair for perforated duodenal ulcers. Surg Endosc 19: 1565-1571 (Pubitemid 41719521)
3. Lau H (2004) Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 18:1013-1021 (Pubitemid 38918008)