Comparison between transvaginal and laparoscopic cholecystectomy - A retrospective case-control study;Vergleich zwischen transvaginaler und laparoskopischer Cholezystektomie - Eine retrospektive Fall-Kontroll-Studie

Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie - Zeitschrift fur Allgemeine, Viszeral- und Gefasschirurgie

Volumn 137, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 48-54

  Hensel, M ^a   Schernikau, U ^a   Schmidt, A ^a   Arlt, G ^a  

^a Park Klinik Weissensee   (Germany)

Author keywords

cholecystectomy; laparoscopic; NOTES; pain; PONV; transvaginal

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NATURAL ORIFICE TRANSLUMINAL ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; VAGINA;

ADULT; AGED; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MIDDLE AGED; NATURAL ORIFICE ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; VAGINA;

EID: 84857359708     PISSN: 0044409X     EISSN: 14389592     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1247332     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ludwig K, Pätel K, Wilhelm L et al. Prospective study on patients outcome following laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy. Zentralbl Chir 2002 127 41-46
2. Golub R, Siddiqui F, Pohl D. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a metaanalysis. J Am Coll Surg 1998 186 545-553 (Pubitemid 28222078)
3. Forgione A. Natural Orifice Surgery: the next step in minimal invasiveness towards no scar surgery. Minerva Chir 2009 64 355-364
4. Asakuma M, Perretta S, Allemann P et al. Challenges and lessons learned from NOTES cholecystectomy initial experience: a stepwise approach from the laboratory to clinical application. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2009 16 249-254
5. Benhidjeb T, Burghardt J, Stark M. Novel technologies for natural orifice surgery: an overview. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2008 17 346-354
6. Kobiela J, Stefaniak T, Mackowiak M et al. NOTES third generation surgery. Vain hopes or the reality of tomorrow? Langenbecks Arch Surg 2008 393 405-411
7. Voermans R P., Van Berge Henegouwen M I., Fockens P. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Endoscopy 2007 39 1013-1017 (Pubitemid 350226950)
8. Navarra G, Rando L, LaMalfa G et al. Hybrid transvaginal cholecystectomy: a novel approach. Am J Surg 2009 197 69-72
9. Noguera J, Dolz C, Cuadrado A et al. Hybrid transvaginal cholecystectomy, NOTES, and minilaparoscopy: analysis of a prospective clinical series. Surg Endosc 2009 23 876-881
10. Marescaux J, Dallemagne B, Perretta S et al. Surgery without scars: report of transluminal cholecystectomy in a human being. Arch Surg 2007 142 823-826 (Pubitemid 47437294)
11. Fuchs K H., Breithaupt W. Endoskopische Chirurgie über natürliche Körperöffnungen NOTES Status quo und Perspektiven. Zentralbl Chir 2009 134 95-99
12. Soleimanian A. Chirurgie: Zum Stellenwert des Operierens über natürliche Körperöffnungen. Dtsch Arztebl 2009 106 A2456-A2458
13. Schweins M. NOTES sollte als experimentelle Technik zunächst nur im Rahmen prospektiver Studien angewendet werden. Chirurgen Magazin 2009 40 4-4
14. Hilbe J M. A review of SYSTAT11. The American Statistician 2005 59 104-110
15. Burghardt J. Chirurgie: Kleine Häuser nicht ausschließen. Dtsch Arztebl 2010 107 B211-B211
16. Zornig C, Mofid H, Siemssen L et al. Transvaginal NOTES hybrid cholecystectomy: feasibility results in 68cases with mid-term follow-up. Endoscopy 2009 41 391-394
17. Thele F, Zygmunt M, Glitsch A et al. How do gynecologists feel about transvaginal NOTES surgery? Endoscopy 2008 40 576-580 (Pubitemid 351982599)
18. Burghardt J, Federlein M, Müller V et al. Minimalinvasive transvaginale Hemikolektomie rechts: Bericht über die erste komplexe NOS (Natural Orifice Surgery) Darmoperation in Hybridtechnik. Zentralbl Chir 2008 133 574-576
19. Joris J, Thiry E, Paris P et al. Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: characteristics and effect of intraperitoneal bupivacaine. Anesth Analg 1995 81 379-384
20. Ure B M., Troidl H, Spangenberger W et al. Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Eur J Surg 1993 159 361-364
21. Fredman B, Jedeikin R, Olsfanger D et al. Residual Pneumoperitoneum. Anesth Analg 1994 79 52-154
22. Fukami Y, Terasaki M, Okamoto Y et al. Efficacy of preoperative dexamethasone in patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2009 16 367-371
23. Wang J J., Ho S T., Liu Y H. et al. Dexamethasone reduces nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Anaesth 1999 83 772-775 (Pubitemid 29502058)
24. Peterson C Y., Ramamoorthy S, Andrews B et al. Womens positive perception of transvaginal NOTES surgery. Surg Endosc 2009 23 1770-1774
25. Perrakis E, Vezakis A, Velimezis G et al. Randomized comparison between different insufflation pressures for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2003 13 245-249 (Pubitemid 37082040)
26. Strang C M., Hachenberg T. Ist das Pneumoperitoneum bei Kolonresektion wirklich minimalinvasiv? Standpunkt aus anästhesiologischer Sicht. Zentralbl Chir 2004 129 196-199 (Pubitemid 38917580)
27. Standl T. Spezielle Aspekte der Abdominalchirurgie: Laparoskopische Chirurgie. In: Kochs E Adams H A. Spies C (Hrsg) Anästhesiologie. 2. Aufl. Stuttgart Thieme 2009 883-884
28. Pugliese R, Forgione A, Sansonna F et al. Hybrid NOTES transvaginal cholecystectomy: operative and long-term results after 18cases. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2010 395 241-245 [Epub 2009 Jul9]
29. Blech J, Hackenbroch V. Medizin: Schläuche in die Leiber. Der Spiegel 2007 29 119-119
30. Kube R, Lippert H, Gastinger I. Wie sicher ist die laparoskopische Cholezystektomie? Zentralbl Chir 2009 134 155-158